I accept the logic of "Play the best", in theory. But the facts disprove it. Two decades of playing SANZAR teams regularly and our record against them has not significantly improved. Now, it could be argued that the intensity of those games has stood us in good stead for the 6N; but the other 6N teams have the same "advantage" and most of them can afford the injuries more than we can. Can you honestly say we look more like beating NZ now than we did in 2002? And I know lots of those games against Aus FELT close, but when you lose 13 in a row you should be able to see that that is at least partly illusory. To my mind at least, the constant pressure of inevitable autumn defeats has a corrosive effect on morale. We tell ourselves that we're learning how to beat them, but all that seems to happen is an annual refresher for them on how to beat us. I'd fancy us far more against an Aus or NZ team that hadn't played us for a few years, who weren't 100% confident of what to expect, and whose individuals didn't have half a dozen wins against us already on their CVs.Numbers wrote:Sourdust wrote:All that said, I'm still annoyed at the schedule. I see no need to keep eagerly queuing up for these autumn hammerings. The Gatland adage of "Play the best to beat the best" is surely past its sell-by date now? It just doesn't work. How long do we need?
I can't agree with you on that front, we aren't as good as the best a lot of the time and we have beaten SA at home, run them very close away and lost very narrowly to Australia on several occassions, there is little to no point in playing inferior teams imo. Also players want to play against the best teams and supporters want to watch them play the big teams, the stadium would be half empty if we played Canada.
The money is a different argument altogether, and one I can't really counter except to raise the usual questions about how the WRU spend it anyway.
