Lions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
- Chunks Baws
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 am
Re: Lions

There's some cringey pish on Social Media but this is beyond. Upper cut yourself.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Reminds me of a classic meme. A special prize for special fans & players.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
Reading all this stuff earlier without having seen the game, I was intrigued. Now that I have seen it, all I can conclude is that some of you are delusional. That was a penalty without any doubt. He caught the ball in an offside position from a knock on, and trying to mitigate it with cry's of it being an instinctive reflex are both laughable and irrelevant. For whatever's reason, the ref bottled that. No wonder the kiwis are whinging, that is an inexplicable decision.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Ha! Aye, right there is he issue with it. It's another one of our laws that relies heavily on interpretation, and worse still, it also asks refs to judge intent.Big D wrote:I asked a couple ref pals on Pussbook and 3 others chimed in. 60/40 split, which is telling even of only a 5 person sample. It should be made clearer in law.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:It's a ropey as fuck law, it needs to be in the game to prevent cynical play, but it's extremely harsh to penalise a player for an instinctive grab of the ball made in a split second from a marginally offside position.
I think it was the correct call, although, I would.
It really does make me wonder if our exit from the World Cup may have had an influence on that call.
One ref saying he only uses accidental offside around rucks and mauls for running into your own player.
One saying that it's hard to know what is a legitimate reflex and what is deliberate so errs on a penalty most of the time.
So the 2 above are refereeing as per 11.7 .
3 saying that was impossible for Owens to get out the way and given proximity to the knock on him catching it could only have been reflex. To them it's clearly accidental offside as he could not have avoided the ball so comes under 11.6.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: RE: Re: Lions
Aye, you could very well be right. My bias is extreme when it comes to sides I support, and I've never been a fan of that law. If it had happened to Scotland I would be spitting blood.Stones of granite wrote:Reading all this stuff earlier without having seen the game, I was intrigued. Now that I have seen it, all I can conclude is that some of you are delusional. That was a penalty without any doubt. He caught the ball in an offside position from a knock on, and trying to mitigate it with cry's of it being an instinctive reflex are both laughable and irrelevant. For whatever's reason, the ref bottled that. No wonder the kiwis are whinging, that is an inexplicable decision.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Ha! Aye, right there is he issue with it. It's another one of our laws that relies heavily on interpretation, and worse still, it also asks refs to judge intent.Big D wrote: I asked a couple ref pals on Pussbook and 3 others chimed in. 60/40 split, which is telling even of only a 5 person sample. It should be made clearer in law.
One ref saying he only uses accidental offside around rucks and mauls for running into your own player.
One saying that it's hard to know what is a legitimate reflex and what is deliberate so errs on a penalty most of the time.
So the 2 above are refereeing as per 11.7 .
3 saying that was impossible for Owens to get out the way and given proximity to the knock on him catching it could only have been reflex. To them it's clearly accidental offside as he could not have avoided the ball so comes under 11.6.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Lions
You have to put it into context. We all (or nearly all) expected an AB whitewash and a right royal thumping in all tests. To draw a series against NZ at home with a limited coach and some poor selections is not a bad performance at all.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Lions fans acting as if a 66-54 series loss on points is something to be proud of. Hilarious.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:30 pm
Re: Lions
Mate...give overhugh_woatmeigh wrote:How many smirnoff ices did it take for you to spread your buttocks for the English, Welsh & Irish Lions? Not many apparently...OptimisticJock wrote:It being the back of 8 on a Saturday night back home I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you be had a couple of Smirnoff ices and are steaming otherwise that chaff is some of the worst you've come up with.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40589770
This really boils my piss, what lions tours boil down to and why Gatland will always pick his favorites
Because he has a blind hope that after 30+ attempts Wales may get a win against a SH team
He only has the worst SA and he hasnt even beaten a poor Australia
And yt they call him a class coach
This really boils my piss, what lions tours boil down to and why Gatland will always pick his favorites
Because he has a blind hope that after 30+ attempts Wales may get a win against a SH team
He only has the worst SA and he hasnt even beaten a poor Australia
And yt they call him a class coach
- Chunks Baws
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 am
Re: Lions
His name is being mentioned for the 2021 gig too. He's a fucking arse.whatisthejava wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40589770
This really boils my piss, what lions tours boil down to and why Gatland will always pick his favorites
Because he has a blind hope that after 30+ attempts Wales may get a win against a SH team
He only has the worst SA and he hasnt even beaten a poor Australia
And yt they call him a class coach
-
- Posts: 12175
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
I'd love to see what Eddie Jones would do with a Lions team in 2021.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: Lions
Eeesh, the prospect of that would severely push my resolve.Chunks Baws wrote:His name is being mentioned for the 2021 gig too. He's a fucking arse.whatisthejava wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40589770
This really boils my piss, what lions tours boil down to and why Gatland will always pick his favorites
Because he has a blind hope that after 30+ attempts Wales may get a win against a SH team
He only has the worst SA and he hasnt even beaten a poor Australia
And yt they call him a class coach
Really want Townsend to put his hand up for the next one. If (as it's been correctly pointed out on here) it's no longer the British and Irish Lions, and more the "insert coach here" Lions. Then I'd personally much rather see Toonys Lions than Gatlands Lions.
- Chunks Baws
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 am
Re: Lions
Same here.Mikey Brown wrote:I'd love to see what Eddie Jones would do with a Lions team in 2021.
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Lions
Maybe I won't bother saving for SAChunks Baws wrote:His name is being mentioned for the 2021 gig too. He's a fucking arse.whatisthejava wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40589770
This really boils my piss, what lions tours boil down to and why Gatland will always pick his favorites
Because he has a blind hope that after 30+ attempts Wales may get a win against a SH team
He only has the worst SA and he hasnt even beaten a poor Australia
And yt they call him a class coach
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Lions
So much for any Scots touring in two years time.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... frica-2021
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... frica-2021
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Lions
I am in no way defending Gatland, but we need to stop pretending it is only he who hasn't picked one or two Scots who we may feel deserved to go. It isn't. McGeechan also picked few Scots.switchskier wrote:So much for any Scots touring in two years time.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... frica-2021
All I want is our players to keep playing well and getting to/being involved in the latter stages of the competitions. Any Lions selection is a bonus for the players and/or fans who still support the concept.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Nothing short of a 6N championship before the lions will get anyone more than a token smattering
Pretty gutted about this but the scots know what they need to do
Pretty gutted about this but the scots know what they need to do
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
If we were picking the Lions now I'd admit none deserve to go bar Hogg perhaps. The inconsistency that we play with is not cut out for top test rugby. Or knock out rugby... so the world cup is a huge concern but that's another topic
- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Lions
All he’s going to do is stuff the squad full of England players so he can train with them for 6 weeks, as he’ll be coaching them after the World Cup.Puja wrote:On the bright side, he won't have been Welsh coach for two years by then, so he'll have less of a tendency to just reach for the players he's used to.
Puja
- Puja
- Posts: 17735
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Lions
I'm still trying to live in denial about that, thank you very much.General Zod wrote:All he’s going to do is stuff the squad full of England players so he can train with them for 6 weeks, as he’ll be coaching them after the World Cup.Puja wrote:On the bright side, he won't have been Welsh coach for two years by then, so he'll have less of a tendency to just reach for the players he's used to.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Lions
Yes but in 2009 we were rubbish. That year in the 6N we scored a total of four tries.Big D wrote:I am in no way defending Gatland, but we need to stop pretending it is only he who hasn't picked one or two Scots who we may feel deserved to go. It isn't. McGeechan also picked few Scots.switchskier wrote:So much for any Scots touring in two years time.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... frica-2021
All I want is our players to keep playing well and getting to/being involved in the latter stages of the competitions. Any Lions selection is a bonus for the players and/or fans who still support the concept.
-
- Posts: 1972
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Lions
McInally travels for sure, quality player & leader, not inclined to giving away hari kiri penalties like some of his teammates
Watson travels but competition is tighter here
Watson travels but competition is tighter here
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Lions
No point speculating at this stage. 2 years out with a RWC to come and no doubt a slew of retirements and some younger/less experienced international players to make some gains.paddy no 11 wrote:McInally travels for sure, quality player & leader, not inclined to giving away hari kiri penalties like some of his teammates
Watson travels but competition is tighter here
Plus we all know we want a team full of Darcy Grahams

That tour will be brutal on the players too so no doubt a few drop outs on tour.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
Gatland going to be official soon, I hear.
Where's EinE these days? He'll be jizzing himself over this one.
Where's EinE these days? He'll be jizzing himself over this one.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Gatland going to be official soon, I hear.
Where's EinE these days? He'll be jizzing himself over this one.
Gatland confirmed
Kinda innterested to see if his loyalty to wales players lasts two years after the WC. He is very loyal to his players but after two years away Pivac may well not work out and Wales could be in a myre so its really difficult to tell what he will do