Jackson & Olding

Post Reply
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Bizarre that Jackson should have to pay legal defence costs for a crime he's not committed. That is a whopping sum of money.

No doubt the claimant has kept her job in tesco and is still able to fund her weekend's out on the piss, prowling for her next victim.
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Image
Idle Feck
User avatar
Tobylerone
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:15 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Tobylerone »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:

No doubt the claimant has kept her job in tesco and is still able to fund her weekend's out on the piss, prowling for her next victim.
Wow, that surely has to take the biscuit, in fact, a whole packet.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by WaspInWales »

There's me worrying about a Strictly fix?!?
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1807
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by BBD »

word is that Jackson is bound for London Irish, good signing for them
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12358
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Mikey Brown »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Bizarre that Jackson should have to pay legal defence costs for a crime he's not committed. That is a whopping sum of money.

No doubt the claimant has kept her job in tesco and is still able to fund her weekend's out on the piss, prowling for her next victim.
Do you know this woman or something? Some of your posts on this subject are totally insane.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Mikey Brown wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Bizarre that Jackson should have to pay legal defence costs for a crime he's not committed. That is a whopping sum of money.

No doubt the claimant has kept her job in tesco and is still able to fund her weekend's out on the piss, prowling for her next victim.
Do you know this woman or something? Some of your posts on this subject are totally insane.
No he's just a misogynist prick.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

cashead wrote:It's a pretty fucking disgusting statement, quite frankly, and this "false rape claim" narrative said misogynist prick is trying to push simply isn't supported by statistics.

So is insinuating they did rape someone, dickhead.
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1807
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by BBD »

Thursday 20th
Thursday 27th
Saturday 29th




Its like watching a fight in super slow motion

lets just do what everyone involved in the trial is probably trying to do and draw a line under it shall we?
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Yeah. And ye Ulster feckers can stick Friday 21st of December up yer holes too.
Idle Feck
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1807
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by BBD »

Just read that Munster A v Leinster A is streaming on Youtube this afternoon at 2pm
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Provocative fecker!
Idle Feck
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1807
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by BBD »

it needed saying
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

As a coda to this long-dead episode, the gosling was home from Weegieville over Easter and while at Holy Mass pointed out yer wan at the literal centre of the story.

I have to say that the bake on her offered compelling testimony to the level of drunkenness of PJ and Olding on the night in question. They'd have had more cred if they'd spit-roasted Johnny's carp.
Idle Feck
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:As a coda to this long-dead episode, the gosling was home from Weegieville over Easter and while at Holy Mass pointed out yer wan at the literal centre of the story.

I have to say that the bake on her offered compelling testimony to the level of drunkenness of PJ and Olding on the night in question. They'd have had more cred if they'd spit-roasted Johnny's carp.

So... not much going for herself at all really? Interesting.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2524
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Numbers »

I see some London Irish fans are saying they will boycott matches due to Jackson being signed, they have made a much better signing however in Naholo.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Numbers wrote:I see some London Irish fans are saying they will boycott matches due to Jackson being signed, they have made a much better signing however in Naholo.
There are far worse individuals in the prem than a misogynist.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2524
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Numbers »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:I see some London Irish fans are saying they will boycott matches due to Jackson being signed, they have made a much better signing however in Naholo.
There are far worse individuals in the prem than a misogynist.
Really, who?
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5898
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Stom »

Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:I see some London Irish fans are saying they will boycott matches due to Jackson being signed, they have made a much better signing however in Naholo.
There are far worse individuals in the prem than a misogynist.
Really, who?
He's taking about yer man, The IcemanTM. And his loving retard eyes towards that yon ball he's about to belt the living crap out of.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:I see some London Irish fans are saying they will boycott matches due to Jackson being signed, they have made a much better signing however in Naholo.
There are far worse individuals in the prem than a misogynist.
Really, who?
Calum Clark by a country mile.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2524
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Numbers »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
There are far worse individuals in the prem than a misogynist.
Really, who?
Calum Clark by a country mile.
Tho that would be for his actions on the rugby pitch where misogyny doesn't really come into play.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Really, who?
Calum Clark by a country mile.
Tho that would be for his actions on the rugby pitch where misogyny doesn't really come into play.
The location & context is irrelevant. He intentionally snapped a prone & trapped opponents arm beyond the elbow. Being disrespectful and sexist towards women isn't quite in the same league mate...
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2524
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Numbers »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Calum Clark by a country mile.
Tho that would be for his actions on the rugby pitch where misogyny doesn't really come into play.
The location & context is irrelevant. He intentionally snapped a prone & trapped opponents arm beyond the elbow. Being disrespectful and sexist towards women isn't quite in the same league mate...
Not really, if you think that what they did amounts to "being sexist and disrespectful to women" then you are in the minority. What Callum Clark did was despicable but not really in the same league as ruining someone's life..
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5898
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Stom »

Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Tho that would be for his actions on the rugby pitch where misogyny doesn't really come into play.
The location & context is irrelevant. He intentionally snapped a prone & trapped opponents arm beyond the elbow. Being disrespectful and sexist towards women isn't quite in the same league mate...
Not really, if you think that what they did amounts to "being sexist and disrespectful to women" then you are in the minority. What Callum Clark did was despicable but not really in the same league as ruining someone's life..
You're here, on the Irish board, arguing with our resident [insert favourite insult here] about anything related to acts against a woman?

This is the internet, there are some battles that are not just unwinnable, they're not worth fighting.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2524
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Jackson & Olding

Post by Numbers »

Stom wrote:
Numbers wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
The location & context is irrelevant. He intentionally snapped a prone & trapped opponents arm beyond the elbow. Being disrespectful and sexist towards women isn't quite in the same league mate...
Not really, if you think that what they did amounts to "being sexist and disrespectful to women" then you are in the minority. What Callum Clark did was despicable but not really in the same league as ruining someone's life..
You're here, on the Irish board, arguing with our resident [insert favourite insult here] about anything related to acts against a woman?

This is the internet, there are some battles that are not just unwinnable, they're not worth fighting.
True enough.
Post Reply