Galfon wrote:That is nearly correct, there is 1 other criteria giving eligibility for selection...a few different names would be there if just most-capped.
Galfon wrote:That is nearly correct, there is 1 other criteria giving eligibility for selection...a few different names would be there if just most-capped.
That neither their christian nor surnames begin with a capital letter
Yes. ('Most capped players who have Lions test caps?')
Some notable absentees (playing wise) for sure.
The capital letters would have just given the game away..
Galfon wrote:Yes. ('Most capped players who have Lions test caps?')
Some notable absentees (playing wise) for sure.
The capital letters would have just given the game away..
Galfon wrote:That is nearly correct, there is 1 other criteria giving eligibility for selection...a few different names would be there if just most-capped.
That neither their christian nor surnames begin with a capital letter
I was going to do a XV of players with the most caps v All Blacks in each position with a 100% win rate, but then realized that it would just be the 1949 Springboks. See the Stats thread for more on this.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Lizard wrote:No. A lot of those players are from before replacements were allowed.
Gosh. I mean, fair point, well made, and strikingly obvious when you put it like that, but I'm stumped as to what else Jamie George tops the stats in, let alone has in common with Tawera Kerr-Barlow.
I’m pretty sure no pro era All Blacks coach is undefeated v Aus. Fred Allen was 3 from 3 back in the day, matched by Bob Duff in 1972.
One thought - did Japan or South Africa play Australia while Eddie was in charge of those?
Puja
Good point. Eddie was assistant to SA in 2007 when they went 1 from 2 v AU. But I would generally not count assistant roles in considering coaching successes.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
What is selection criterion here:
(due to limited numbers available, several have been asked to play out of position.)
1. t daly aus
2. j robinson eng
3. t woodcock nz
4. t dusautoir fra
5. o finnegan aus
6. j kirwan nz
7. m jones nz
8. d pocock aus
9. p berbizier fra/d kirk nz
10. b barrett nz
11. l tuquiri aus
12. m nonu nz
13. t kuridranu aus
14. n milner-scudder nz
15 b tune aus
1 notable nation missing representation.
who and why ..?
South Africa is unrepresented, but it can’t be because the criteria involve them as opposition - David Kirk’s whole career was during their exclusion due to Apartheid.
Something to do with World Cups?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Galfon wrote:What is selection criterion here:
(due to limited numbers available, several have been asked to play out of position.)
1. t daly aus
2. j robinson eng
3. t woodcock nz
4. t dusautoir fra
5. o finnegan aus
6. j kirwan nz
7. m jones nz
8. d pocock aus
9. p berbizier fra/d kirk nz
10. b barrett nz
11. l tuquiri aus
12. m nonu nz
13. t kuridranu aus
14. n milner-scudder nz
15 b tune aus
1 notable nation missing representation.
who and why ..?
Try scorers in RWC finals. South Africa are excluded because both their victories came from penalties and drop goals.