Cricket fred

Post Reply
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

3 gone in 8 balls - back on track. :cry:
YJ gets his timbers tumbled again..another chance for him goes begging.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Very giving of Bairstow not to give the selectors any issues if they wanted to pick a spinner
fivepointer
Posts: 5933
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Poor shots from Root and Stokes. And a typical non shot from Bairstow who makes the bowlers job far too easy. Any kind of 1st innings lead seems unlikely at this stage.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

SA 158 lead with 7 wickets to play with..
It's another heady mix of Results wicket/ Eng. flakiness.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Plenty of soft dismissals from both sides in this match, that and the current state of the game after just 2 days leads me to conclude there'll be a winner in the opener, you heard it here first!
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
Philander is a fantastic bowler.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Banquo wrote: Philander is a fantastic bowler.
Apart from his wickets to concede just a run/over from 15 on that track was tops (compare Archer)
To call his retirement from the national team at just 34 seems a bit previous.He's off to Zummerzet next year & covering his options :) .
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
Philander is a fantastic bowler.
He's very good, just maybe not as good as we made him look
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
Philander is a fantastic bowler.
He's very good, just maybe not as good as we made him look
Sounds familiar, we’ve also made their batsmen look better than they are. He showed us the line and length, but we seem unable to learn; Archer needs some help I think.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Archer just spent a week in bed being sick and was then asked to bowl first rather than rest another day, and do so in very hot weather when the pitch would only get worse. Though yes Archer needs some help, hopefully in the main with the workload
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

The lurgy is getting a grip on the team - Buttler & not well-looking Root affected today..
The Nortje-watchman grabs forty, and the weather's worsening.Happy days.

On a brighter note, Clive Lloyd gets his knighthood - very fine player but a great captain.
Well deserved - put alot back into the game too.
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:Archer just spent a week in bed being sick and was then asked to bowl first rather than rest another day, and do so in very hot weather when the pitch would only get worse. Though yes Archer needs some help, hopefully in the main with the workload
I was referring also to his 'form' in NZ....

my we bowled badly this morning, suppose some lurgy mitigation..
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote:The lurgy is getting a grip on the team - Buttler & not well-looking Root affected today..
The Nortje-watchman grabs forty, and the weather's worsening.Happy days.

On a brighter note, Clive Lloyd gets his knighthood - very fine player but a great captain.
Well deserved - put alot back into the game too.
....and one of the greatest cover points in the history of the game.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

wtf..??

(50 opening partnership)
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Nobody saw that coming. If we can get some more runs before the next rolling of the roller wears off this might be a game yet
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

A faint sniff - steady start essential.
Hopefully the illness in the camp doesn't spread (not literally) and complicate matters.

* Also i'd to point out this is the two-thousandth reply on this fred and as such could attract considerable value in the lurk export market, in a by-gone era.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Not the best start - Burns & Denley depart.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote:Not the best start - Burns & Denley depart.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.
Burns will be hanging his head a bit...
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Have to worry about YJB. Think he needs some proper time off; he's corrected technical faults before.

Buttler needs to play his normal game imo.
Banquo
Posts: 19359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

amazingly, we collapsed again; illness is a bit of a mitigation, but these collapses are too regular.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Last 5 wkts. in 5 overs.. 129 for 9 wickets today when a win was a possibility... :|
The debilitating extent of the lurgy is an unknown, but this team seems to fold more readily than a napkin at the moment.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

The good news is with just one qualification spot open for the utter abhorrence that is the world test championship bollocks we're exceedingly unlikely to make it.
fivepointer
Posts: 5933
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Think illness was a telling factor. Most of the team had bouts of illness before and during the game. It shouldnt be used as an excuse as England, yet again, came up short in too many areas. Opting to bowl first looked a gamble at the time and hindsight confirmed it was a poor decision.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

I'd accept the illness and attending lack of a spinner more as explanations for the bowling than the batting, and certainly than batting collapses. Especially when collapsing in both innings is what our batters do when in theory not ill, if anything they maintained standards admirably.

Ideally we'd make SA bowl another 70-80 overs at us in the next test, but we've got to manage another 50 odd unless SA have at least one miserable failure with their batting.
Post Reply