Cricket fred
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
A faint sniff - steady start essential.
Hopefully the illness in the camp doesn't spread (not literally) and complicate matters.
* Also i'd to point out this is the two-thousandth reply on this fred and as such could attract considerable value in the lurk export market, in a by-gone era.
Hopefully the illness in the camp doesn't spread (not literally) and complicate matters.
* Also i'd to point out this is the two-thousandth reply on this fred and as such could attract considerable value in the lurk export market, in a by-gone era.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Not the best start - Burns & Denley depart.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Burns will be hanging his head a bit...Galfon wrote:Not the best start - Burns & Denley depart.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Have to worry about YJB. Think he needs some proper time off; he's corrected technical faults before.
Buttler needs to play his normal game imo.
Buttler needs to play his normal game imo.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
amazingly, we collapsed again; illness is a bit of a mitigation, but these collapses are too regular.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Last 5 wkts. in 5 overs.. 129 for 9 wickets today when a win was a possibility...
The debilitating extent of the lurgy is an unknown, but this team seems to fold more readily than a napkin at the moment.

The debilitating extent of the lurgy is an unknown, but this team seems to fold more readily than a napkin at the moment.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
The good news is with just one qualification spot open for the utter abhorrence that is the world test championship bollocks we're exceedingly unlikely to make it.
-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Think illness was a telling factor. Most of the team had bouts of illness before and during the game. It shouldnt be used as an excuse as England, yet again, came up short in too many areas. Opting to bowl first looked a gamble at the time and hindsight confirmed it was a poor decision.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
I'd accept the illness and attending lack of a spinner more as explanations for the bowling than the batting, and certainly than batting collapses. Especially when collapsing in both innings is what our batters do when in theory not ill, if anything they maintained standards admirably.
Ideally we'd make SA bowl another 70-80 overs at us in the next test, but we've got to manage another 50 odd unless SA have at least one miserable failure with their batting.
Ideally we'd make SA bowl another 70-80 overs at us in the next test, but we've got to manage another 50 odd unless SA have at least one miserable failure with their batting.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
More bad luck - Burns out of tour following a football injury (ankle) in training. Not the first one to suffer this fate - could well be the last eh.. 

-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
How come Leach has fallen out of favour? We don't seem to have any patience with spin bowlers, certainly compared to some batsmen.
- Puja
- Posts: 17694
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
He's genuinely not that good of a bowler. His turn is practically non-existent on anything but a helpful pitch and he's neither accurate enough to hold down an end nor has enough tricks in his locker to present a threat.Banquo wrote:How come Leach has fallen out of favour? We don't seem to have any patience with spin bowlers, certainly compared to some batsmen.
Genuinely, Root is a better spin option.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Their test records to date dont agree- Leach is going at less than 3 an over and is taking wickets at less than 30, not bad for starting a test career on flattish pitches.Puja wrote:He's genuinely not that good of a bowler. His turn is practically non-existent on anything but a helpful pitch and he's neither accurate enough to hold down an end nor has enough tricks in his locker to present a threat.Banquo wrote:How come Leach has fallen out of favour? We don't seem to have any patience with spin bowlers, certainly compared to some batsmen.
Genuinely, Root is a better spin option.
Puja
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
yep. Broad should bat at 15.Mellsblue wrote:Ffs
-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Poor to have so many starts but only one batsman getting to 50. Some of the dismissals were incredibly soft.
At least Broad provided a comedy turn.
At least Broad provided a comedy turn.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
its sad that Broad has gone from being a decent bowling all rounder to being a comedy batsman.fivepointer wrote:Poor to have so many starts but only one batsman getting to 50. Some of the dismissals were incredibly soft.
At least Broad provided a comedy turn.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
He was genuinely not well, as in I don't think they even knew if he'd be able to train ahead of this match. And I assume they just weren't confident he would last a 5 day match given low energy levels. I also assume he simply had the virus the was going around, I did know what was wrong with him and simply cannot remember nowBanquo wrote:Their test records to date dont agree- Leach is going at less than 3 an over and is taking wickets at less than 30, not bad for starting a test career on flattish pitches.Puja wrote:He's genuinely not that good of a bowler. His turn is practically non-existent on anything but a helpful pitch and he's neither accurate enough to hold down an end nor has enough tricks in his locker to present a threat.Banquo wrote:How come Leach has fallen out of favour? We don't seem to have any patience with spin bowlers, certainly compared to some batsmen.
Genuinely, Root is a better spin option.
Puja
At least we picked a spinner, though how much use when our batsman are clearly better at football than cricket I don't know
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
I'd heard a pundit- maybe Agnew- say they'd lost confidence in Leach.Digby wrote:He was genuinely not well, as in I don't think they even knew if he'd be able to train ahead of this match. And I assume they just weren't confident he would last a 5 day match given low energy levels. I also assume he simply had the virus the was going around, I did know what was wrong with him and simply cannot remember nowBanquo wrote:Their test records to date dont agree- Leach is going at less than 3 an over and is taking wickets at less than 30, not bad for starting a test career on flattish pitches.Puja wrote:
He's genuinely not that good of a bowler. His turn is practically non-existent on anything but a helpful pitch and he's neither accurate enough to hold down an end nor has enough tricks in his locker to present a threat.
Genuinely, Root is a better spin option.
Puja
At least we picked a spinner, though how much use when our batsman are clearly better at football than cricket I don't know
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
That might also be true, but I do know there were doubts he'd be ready to train on Wednesday or Thursday this week. And with the side likely to have been missing Archer you'd think they'd want Leach not Bess at least for this gameBanquo wrote:I'd heard a pundit- maybe Agnew- say they'd lost confidence in Leach.Digby wrote:He was genuinely not well, as in I don't think they even knew if he'd be able to train ahead of this match. And I assume they just weren't confident he would last a 5 day match given low energy levels. I also assume he simply had the virus the was going around, I did know what was wrong with him and simply cannot remember nowBanquo wrote: Their test records to date dont agree- Leach is going at less than 3 an over and is taking wickets at less than 30, not bad for starting a test career on flattish pitches.
At least we picked a spinner, though how much use when our batsman are clearly better at football than cricket I don't know
I wonder if Anderson has missed walking out to bat with no runs on the board?
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Very ordinary total, no shock there.
Good riposte early doors by the quickies - Elgar playing with a degree of pomp, under the circumstances.
Good riposte early doors by the quickies - Elgar playing with a degree of pomp, under the circumstances.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Galfon wrote:Very ordinary total, no shock there.
Good riposte early doors by the quickies - Elgar playing with a degree of pomp, under the circumstances.


- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cricket fred
Very good. Very good, indeed.Galfon wrote: Elgar playing with a degree of pomp, under the circumstances.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cricket fred
Don’t worry chaps. Root reckons it will only take 8 years to sort out this mess.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
bowled like sh@t since lunch compounded by a no ball `wicket'
Pietersen is an unwelcome addition to commentary
Pietersen is an unwelcome addition to commentary