Okay, that made me laugh out loud.morepork wrote:Digby wrote:What's the bar for mature?morepork wrote:Digby likes him a bit of mature, the dorty fecker.
Probably to prevent them slipping in the shower and breaking a hip.
Puja
Okay, that made me laugh out loud.morepork wrote:Digby wrote:What's the bar for mature?morepork wrote:Digby likes him a bit of mature, the dorty fecker.
Probably to prevent them slipping in the shower and breaking a hip.
good workmorepork wrote:Digby wrote:What's the bar for mature?morepork wrote:Digby likes him a bit of mature, the dorty fecker.
Probably to prevent them slipping in the shower and breaking a hip.
Early?morepork wrote:Mild cognitive impairment with possible early dementia?
In Sanders case, it is what he says.morepork wrote:They can speak in complete sentences.
Unless having a heart attackmorepork wrote:They can speak in complete sentences.
What are you quoting?gransoporro wrote:In Sanders case, it is what he says.morepork wrote:They can speak in complete sentences.
He moved from “I have nothing to be ashamed of” to “I never do anything wrong, and if it happens it is from infiltrated”. The latter is Trumpian.
BTW, what was he thinking when he wrote that cancer can be psicosomatic, the effect of a bad relationship with the mother or a female teacher? He is definitely less crazy now!!
Warren your gal then, Porky?morepork wrote:Mild cognitive impairment with possible early dementia? Sure, anything but a woman. Women are dirty.
How many old white dudes does it take to change a light bulb?
I'm not sure how to respond to the second bit. I'd like to think people can see through Bloomberg/Biden and that if she fails in her run it won't be down to mansplaining/not being able to get a word in. But I suppose it can't be ruled out. Zingers and snappy social media sound-bites seem to rule all and she's pretty good at those.morepork wrote:She's easily got the best track record fit for today's mild climate-changey wintry climate of inequality. She is the architect of a lot of consumer protection set in place after the financial sector lost it's rhythm and spunked the spawn of Goldman Sachs into the public belly.
But shes a geeky woman that will just get mansplained off the ticket, with the odd crying bilionaire thrown in for good measure.
I wouldn't call it that, it's just a block of text that happens to be on a different website, but I take your point.morepork wrote:I just don't think 'Murrica is ready to handle a woman in the top job. She is being coy about universal healthcare because that is what they will beat her about the head with. Ditto Sanders. Health insurance is a complex issue in the States, and nothing gets done in the health feild without it, including clinical trials for new drugs. Insurers are simply a non-negotiable obstacle that must be tackled whether you are testing a new drug or lobbying to fight for access to that drug, no one will do anything unless the activity is insured. I'm really reluctant to follow a line of investigation via twitter because it is more likley to result endless loop of anecdote and speculation. At the moment I see a capable professional that has a history of fierce advocacy for the consumer (and like it or not, the American public are considered consumers when it comes to health care). If there are skeletons in the closet, then this circus of a confirmation process should (in theory) out it.
An article from The NY Times, it is available only to subscribers so I cannot post it. He wrote that drivel 50 years ago. And also that too many orgasms cause cancer in women.Mikey Brown wrote:What are you quoting?gransoporro wrote:In Sanders case, it is what he says.morepork wrote:They can speak in complete sentences.
He moved from “I have nothing to be ashamed of” to “I never do anything wrong, and if it happens it is from infiltrated”. The latter is Trumpian.
BTW, what was he thinking when he wrote that cancer can be psicosomatic, the effect of a bad relationship with the mother or a female teacher? He is definitely less crazy now!!
Correction, it was too few orgasms (sexual repression) that cause cancer in women.gransoporro wrote:An article from The NY Times, it is available only to subscribers so I cannot post it. He wrote that drivel 50 years ago. And also that too many orgasms cause cancer in women.Mikey Brown wrote:What are you quoting?gransoporro wrote: In Sanders case, it is what he says.
He moved from “I have nothing to be ashamed of” to “I never do anything wrong, and if it happens it is from infiltrated”. The latter is Trumpian.
BTW, what was he thinking when he wrote that cancer can be psicosomatic, the effect of a bad relationship with the mother or a female teacher? He is definitely less crazy now!!
He is still a fan of alternative medicine, though. But as complementary to the “official medicine”, not as a replacement.
As I said, he is far less crazy now.
America is ready for a woman to hold the top job, but there has not been a thick skinned woman with balls ready to take the stage. Warren does not have the gusto.... or much else. As a woman, I get tired of hearing how oppressed our gender is, and how unfair women get treated. I dont buy in to that nonsense and certainly have never felt oppressed a day in my life.morepork wrote:OK, that is a little icky.
I am registered as independent and quite frankly I find it hard to see the primary competition.Coco wrote:America is ready for a woman to hold the top job, but there has not been a thick skinned woman with balls ready to take the stage. Warren does not have the gusto.... or much else. As a woman, I get tired of hearing how oppressed our gender is, and how unfair women get treated. I dont buy in to that nonsense and certainly have never felt oppressed a day in my life.morepork wrote:OK, that is a little icky.
In fact just the opposite. If you dont want to be treated like a doormat then you need to get up off the floor.
Whatcha think about Tulsi?