COVID19

Post Reply
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by morepork »

Much faster turnaround too, at least for the initial yes/no question. You could send teams to do entire households and really isolate those infected bastards in the neighbourhood and find out who they came into contact with. In fact, if the sampling design was sound, you could very quickly obtain data for entire populations. I wonder if they are doing this? There should be enough preliminary data out there for the King's College geek squad to get an idea of variance and do a power analysis on minimum sample size needed.

Beats the fuck out of symptomatic people driving up to a tent in the middle of a supermarket car park to get a cotton bud stuck up there nose by a nurse in a plastic rubbish bag and a handkerchief over their face.
Banquo
Posts: 20887
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Banquo »

morepork wrote:
Beats the fuck out of people driving up to a tent in the middle of a supermarket car park to get a cotton bud stuck up there nose by a nurse in a plastic rubbish bag and a handkerchief over their face.
Essex dogging in a nutshell
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by morepork »

"their"

FFS.


Dogging in a car park. Class.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16083
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: COVID19

Post by Mellsblue »

morepork wrote:I wonder if they are doing this? There should be enough preliminary data out there for the King's College geek squad to get an idea of variance and do a power analysis on minimum sample size needed.
They’ve modelled it......obviously. Reading the reports on it, we’re at the point now, ie total numbers are too high, where you’d have to stick an app on everyone’s phone that would automatically tell you if you’ve been in range of a carrier.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by morepork »

Mellsblue wrote:
morepork wrote:I wonder if they are doing this? There should be enough preliminary data out there for the King's College geek squad to get an idea of variance and do a power analysis on minimum sample size needed.
They’ve modelled it......obviously. Reading the reports on it, we’re at the point now, ie total numbers are too high, where you’d have to stick an app on everyone’s phone that would automatically tell you if you’ve been in range of a carrier.

You could have the actual data rather than relying on a model is wot I meant.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16083
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: COVID19

Post by Mellsblue »

morepork wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
morepork wrote:I wonder if they are doing this? There should be enough preliminary data out there for the King's College geek squad to get an idea of variance and do a power analysis on minimum sample size needed.
They’ve modelled it......obviously. Reading the reports on it, we’re at the point now, ie total numbers are too high, where you’d have to stick an app on everyone’s phone that would automatically tell you if you’ve been in range of a carrier.

You could have the actual data rather than relying on a model is wot I meant.
Ah, I see. As you were.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2668
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Banquo wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
Banquo wrote:Today's figures make very grim reading.
Shit. Thats a bit of a jump, although you can still argue that those who are dying today caught the illness prior to the lockdown.
also suspect they are recording out of hospital deaths finally. Infections obviously growing in line with acceleration in testing.

In other news, its weird that no regional strategies are that apparent. Currently in the East of England, still lowish infection rates, hospitals eerily quiet, PPE coming out of our ears, staff who have been deployed by me and others into acutes and integrated community teams not hugely busy; whether its the calm before the storm, or whether the NHS should have been deploying into areas of need, time will tell. Its ridiculous that the supply chain of say PPE is so badly managed.
It was announced as hospital deaths. We've got the pain of other deaths still to come.
morepork wrote:Much faster turnaround too, at least for the initial yes/no question. You could send teams to do entire households and really isolate those infected bastards in the neighbourhood and find out who they came into contact with. In fact, if the sampling design was sound, you could very quickly obtain data for entire populations. I wonder if they are doing this? There should be enough preliminary data out there for the King's College geek squad to get an idea of variance and do a power analysis on minimum sample size needed.

Beats the fuck out of symptomatic people driving up to a tent in the middle of a supermarket car park to get a cotton bud stuck up there nose by a nurse in a plastic rubbish bag and a handkerchief over their face.
It's fucking clever isn't it? Wouldn't have occurred to me. I wonder if it came from a biologist or mathematician or some other source (a professional gambler for example).
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2668
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Mellsblue wrote:This builds on the previous article I linked:

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/u ... -abandoned
That's brilliant journalism. Are they making their Covid19 stuff free to air? I keep expecting to hit a paywall.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16083
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: COVID19

Post by Mellsblue »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:This builds on the previous article I linked:

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/u ... -abandoned
That's brilliant journalism. Are they making their Covid19 stuff free to air? I keep expecting to hit a paywall.
No idea. I’ve read a couple of their pieces today with no requests for bank details. As tragic as this all is, it’s going to make for fascinating reading as details become clearer.
I read a piece on Colonel Boreham and his management of the construction and resourcing of Nightingale Hospital this evening. Unbelievable stuff. I’m a big fan of democracy but I’d happily have him in charge of the country for the next year or so.
Donny osmond
Posts: 3161
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Donny osmond »

Seemingly some grades of oil are now into negative pricing... which strikes me as spectacularly weird

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/01/business ... index.html

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by morepork »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:This builds on the previous article I linked:

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/u ... -abandoned
That's brilliant journalism. Are they making their Covid19 stuff free to air? I keep expecting to hit a paywall.

It still assumes that polling for public opinion is an acceptable substitute for hard data that resolves patterns of a biological phenomenon. This is just wrong on every level. A virus is an elegant product of evolution that, by virtue of that inherent simplicity is entirely predictable in behaviour . To even contemplate promoting public opinion as a defining variable is a slap in the face to the laws of nature and unbelievably arrogant and ignorant in equal measure. I just don’t understand how this didn’t register with heads of state earlier than it has. History is replete with examples.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4568
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Galfon »

They're cracking on with things down-under, 2 possible vaccs. (vector, foreign protein coding) - hope the ferreting about gets results..It's a pity the necessary safe-testing takes so long; maybe the explosion of drug testings can deliver something effective. The anti-malarial is in short supply already pending proper testing.The Chinese reckon it's nfg..
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by canta_brian »

Galfon wrote:They're cracking on with things down-under, 2 possible vaccs. (vector, foreign protein coding) - hope the ferreting about gets results..It's a pity the necessary safe-testing takes so long; maybe the explosion of drug testings can deliver something effective. The anti-malarial is in short supply already pending proper testing.The Chinese reckon it's nfg..
I’m only getting no fucking good for nfg?
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: COVID19

Post by Digby »

not for Gaijin if it were the Japanese
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4568
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Galfon »

Apols..
'disappointed in a China clinical trial on mild COVID-19 patients.' (no fc'kin good, correct.)
..meantime, approaching 1 million:
- Confirmed cases worldwide
- New benefit claims in last 2 weeks. :|

Some progress in China animal meat markets
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-52131940 (bear bile ? ffs).
need total ban on the likes of bats & civets, shewerly..
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by canta_brian »

A bit more info on that pooled testing idea from Germany.

https://healthcare-in-europe.com/en/new ... -over.html#
Banquo
Posts: 20887
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Banquo »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
Shit. Thats a bit of a jump, although you can still argue that those who are dying today caught the illness prior to the lockdown.
also suspect they are recording out of hospital deaths finally. Infections obviously growing in line with acceleration in testing.

In other news, its weird that no regional strategies are that apparent. Currently in the East of England, still lowish infection rates, hospitals eerily quiet, PPE coming out of our ears, staff who have been deployed by me and others into acutes and integrated community teams not hugely busy; whether its the calm before the storm, or whether the NHS should have been deploying into areas of need, time will tell. Its ridiculous that the supply chain of say PPE is so badly managed.
It was announced as hospital deaths. We've got the pain of other deaths still to come.
morepork wrote:Much faster turnaround too, at least for the initial yes/no question. You could send teams to do entire households and really isolate those infected bastards in the neighbourhood and find out who they came into contact with. In fact, if the sampling design was sound, you could very quickly obtain data for entire populations. I wonder if they are doing this? There should be enough preliminary data out there for the King's College geek squad to get an idea of variance and do a power analysis on minimum sample size needed.

Beats the fuck out of symptomatic people driving up to a tent in the middle of a supermarket car park to get a cotton bud stuck up there nose by a nurse in a plastic rubbish bag and a handkerchief over their face.
It's fucking clever isn't it? Wouldn't have occurred to me. I wonder if it came from a biologist or mathematician or some other source (a professional gambler for example).
ah ok, ta. Looking for a tiny sliver of hope, damn.
Banquo
Posts: 20887
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Banquo »

morepork wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:This builds on the previous article I linked:

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/u ... -abandoned
That's brilliant journalism. Are they making their Covid19 stuff free to air? I keep expecting to hit a paywall.

It still assumes that polling for public opinion is an acceptable substitute for hard data that resolves patterns of a biological phenomenon. This is just wrong on every level. A virus is an elegant product of evolution that, by virtue of that inherent simplicity is entirely predictable in behaviour . To even contemplate promoting public opinion as a defining variable is a slap in the face to the laws of nature and unbelievably arrogant and ignorant in equal measure. I just don’t understand how this didn’t register with heads of state earlier than it has. History is replete with examples.
I think arrogance and incompetence sums up the mean of the approaches; I'll offer up a couple of honourable national exceptions, possibly.
User avatar
Tobylerone
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:15 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: COVID19

Post by Tobylerone »

Donny osmond wrote:

Tobylerone has a point, albeit one that you would prob only know about if you're inside the Scottish bubble. In the last year it has come to light that the Scot govt are using ministers and spin doctors to redact politically sensitive FOI responses. They have been held to task several times by the ICO for deliberately incomplete or inaccurate responses. From outside the FOI extension looks, as Eug says, a bit meh, but from within Scotland it's part of a pattern that is starting to be troubling.

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk


"Social Distancing" arrangements at Holyrood yesterday reduced MSP`s attendance, giving minority SNP Gov. an easier ride.

Managed to push through "Emergency" (ha) FOI legislation allowing up to 200 days delay for release.
Donny osmond
Posts: 3161
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: COVID19

Post by Donny osmond »

Tobylerone wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:

Tobylerone has a point, albeit one that you would prob only know about if you're inside the Scottish bubble. In the last year it has come to light that the Scot govt are using ministers and spin doctors to redact politically sensitive FOI responses. They have been held to task several times by the ICO for deliberately incomplete or inaccurate responses. From outside the FOI extension looks, as Eug says, a bit meh, but from within Scotland it's part of a pattern that is starting to be troubling.

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk


"Social Distancing" arrangements at Holyrood yesterday reduced MSP`s attendance, giving minority SNP Gov. an easier ride.

Managed to push through "Emergency" (ha) FOI legislation allowing up to 200 days delay for release.
Yeah 200 days per FOI should see them nicely thru next year's elections without any dirty laundry seeing the light of day.

Without wishing to derail a covid thread I'm starting to have the same visceral reaction to the SNP that some have to the Tories

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
Banquo
Posts: 20887
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Banquo »

Roughly the same numbers today. Post Easter is when the acutes are gearing up for 'peak'.

They are just starting to talk about non hospital deaths.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16083
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: COVID19

Post by Mellsblue »

Sandydragon wrote:
Stom wrote:
morepork wrote:FuckBook growing a pair?

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52106321

Bolsonaro seems a right odious little cunt.
Little?

He’s one of the holy septuplets of cuntdom, along with Trump, Modi, Duterte, Putin, Erdogan, and my glorious Viktator.
Duterte Harry has been a bit quiet of late. I’m surprised he hasn’t ordered the shooting of anyone with a sniff.
Any chance of tomorrow’s lottery numbers?

https://www.france24.com/en/20200402-sh ... -violators
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by canta_brian »

So the Nightingale is up an running. Got to hand it to Boris, I never believed he would follow through in that election pledge to build 40 new hospitals but we’re under way.

Anyone know where I can buy a back Boris T-Shirt and a union flag?
Donny osmond
Posts: 3161
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Donny osmond »

From The Economist, via Twitter, showing discrepancies in figures from various places.


Also people seem to be amazed etc by Spanish Services PMI being announced this morning as a figure of 23. Can anyone enlighten me as to what PMI is and why a figure of 23 is so ultra.... something?Image

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
Banquo
Posts: 20887
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: COVID19

Post by Banquo »

Donny osmond wrote:From The Economist, via Twitter, showing discrepancies in figures from various places.


Also people seem to be amazed etc by Spanish Services PMI being announced this morning as a figure of 23. Can anyone enlighten me as to what PMI is and why a figure of 23 is so ultra.... something?Image

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
https://tradingeconomics.com/spain/manufacturing-pmi
Post Reply