Cricket fred

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

There's no doubt that our victories were achieved with ample assists from Sri Lanka, but any series victory in the subcontinent is not to be sniffed at and it's a great confidence boost for the players ahead of India.

Very impressed by Sibley's gumption. Excellent job as the backbone of the second innings.

Puja
Backist Monk
Big D
Posts: 5599
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

I feel a little for Sibley and Crawley, they are learning on the hoof a little having to open against spinners on turning pitches. Can't be easy.

Would think it is Crawley v Lawrence for the spot as 6th batsman, perhaps even Ali. England really have lots of options for India, especially if Stokes is fit enough to bowl a few overs. Might not help, but they do have options.

Would think:

Burns
Sibley
Order TBC between:
Root
Pope (if fit)
Crawley/Lawrence
Stokes
----
Buttler
Bess
Leach
Wood/Archer
Anderson/Broad
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

We don't have much proven quality against spin there, Root, Stokes and...? Which will be interesting
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Digby wrote:We don't have much proven quality against spin there, Root, Stokes and...? Which will be interesting
Then we'll just have to call up Keaton Jennings ;)

I think the team is starting to take shape.

Sibley
Burns
Crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope/Lawrence
Buttler
Bess
Archer
Wood/Broad/Leach/Ali/Woakes*
Anderson/Broad

*obvs, Ali or Woakes would bat at 8, not 10.

With Bairstow to also call on (he's an excellent fielder, better than his keeping, as shown by his poor slip fielding, too...) that's a strong lineup.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:We don't have much proven quality against spin there, Root, Stokes and...? Which will be interesting
I would say Buttler's also a pretty good player of spin generally. It'sa shame Bairstow's not there for India as he's our other natural spin player.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:We don't have much proven quality against spin there, Root, Stokes and...? Which will be interesting
I would say Buttler's also a pretty good player of spin generally. It'sa shame Bairstow's not there for India as he's our other natural spin player.

Puja
I'm pretty much with Nasser on this one. We wouldn't be looking to rest key players 1st game up against Oz, so why is it the time to do it for India in what's arguably the hardest series going in cricket right now

Buttler is good on offence, but he goes firmly at the ball

Interested to see how Lawrence goes, if he plays, he looks more like an Indian player than almost anyone else fresh out of England I can think of. We tend to be quite rigid and play with the spin, or try to, his technique might allow him to play more against it if he wants/can
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Lizard »

I hope the UK has a better handle on Covid before our June test series. It's a shame it's only 2 tests but better than nothing at short notice. As the No. 1 side in the World, NZ really should be playing more tests and more 3+ test series. We've played 10 series 2018-2021, 6 were 2 tests and 4 were 3 tests, and only 1 of those was against a Big 3 side (Aust). Our last 5 test series was in 1971/72 (v WI). We haven't even played 4 since England in 1999.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

I'd back all the sides playing 5 test series. But then I'd back binning off 20/20 at international level and dropping the number of ODIs, and I've no issue with the players earning less money, so it's an easy cause for me to support, others would understandably take a different view
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Lizard »

I can understand 3 tests if there is likely to be a clear stronger team. 2 just isn't enough.

I can't believe that the WTC is to be decided by a 1-off test though. That's mad. It should be a 5 match series, 1 each at a home ground of the home team's choosing, and three iconic but different grounds around the world.

Imagine, say, NZ v Aust at Seddon Park, the MCG (or 'Gabba), Sabina Park, Eden Gardens, and Lords.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

I can't believe there is a WTC, well I can but it's just the wrong emphasis to place on the test game for me, similar to there being test rankings. Part of the fun is an argument that's ongoing as to who the best side is, which right now would be India.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:I can't believe there is a WTC, well I can but it's just the wrong emphasis to place on the test game for me, similar to there being test rankings. Part of the fun is an argument that's ongoing as to who the best side is, which right now would be India.
Not New Zealand? Admittedly, India did recover to win the series, but it's bold to call a side that got bowled out for 36 the best in the world.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:I can't believe there is a WTC, well I can but it's just the wrong emphasis to place on the test game for me, similar to there being test rankings. Part of the fun is an argument that's ongoing as to who the best side is, which right now would be India.
Not New Zealand? Admittedly, India did recover to win the series, but it's bold to call a side that got bowled out for 36 the best in the world.

Puja
I'm led to believe they barely play any actual test series. Though they've done well on their decades long series of exhibition matches. And to be slightly more serious if went down the pub debate combined selection route, and it doesn't get much more serious, I'd easily be picking more Indian players.

I would concede India, like a few sides, look weakest in the top order of their batting.
Big D
Posts: 5599
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Digby wrote: I'm pretty much with Nasser on this one. We wouldn't be looking to rest key players 1st game up against Oz, so why is it the time to do it for India in what's arguably the hardest series going in cricket right now
These guys have been away from home and families for a long time now. i am sure is in the 200+ days since the start of the SA tour for some of them due to bio secure bubbles etc. Easy for Nas to say that at home where he gets to see his family but for the guys like Buttler the constant covid related restrictions must weigh on them at some point, especially with a nearly 2 year old at home who he will have missed a lot of time with that he would have had if not for covid.

I am sure some would argue the players should sacrifice the IPL for time at home but with the T20 world cup on the horizon it is as good a prep as some will get for it.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Big D wrote:
Digby wrote: I'm pretty much with Nasser on this one. We wouldn't be looking to rest key players 1st game up against Oz, so why is it the time to do it for India in what's arguably the hardest series going in cricket right now
These guys have been away from home and families for a long time now. i am sure is in the 200+ days since the start of the SA tour for some of them due to bio secure bubbles etc. Easy for Nas to say that at home where he gets to see his family but for the guys like Buttler the constant covid related restrictions must weigh on them at some point, especially with a nearly 2 year old at home who he will have missed a lot of time with that he would have had if not for covid.

I am sure some would argue the players should sacrifice the IPL for time at home but with the T20 world cup on the horizon it is as good a prep as some will get for it.
Then rest them in the Sri Lanka tour not the India one is I suspect his point. 'twas amusing banter from Dickwella directed at Bairstow though, so there is that
Big D
Posts: 5599
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Digby wrote:
Big D wrote:
Digby wrote: I'm pretty much with Nasser on this one. We wouldn't be looking to rest key players 1st game up against Oz, so why is it the time to do it for India in what's arguably the hardest series going in cricket right now
These guys have been away from home and families for a long time now. i am sure is in the 200+ days since the start of the SA tour for some of them due to bio secure bubbles etc. Easy for Nas to say that at home where he gets to see his family but for the guys like Buttler the constant covid related restrictions must weigh on them at some point, especially with a nearly 2 year old at home who he will have missed a lot of time with that he would have had if not for covid.

I am sure some would argue the players should sacrifice the IPL for time at home but with the T20 world cup on the horizon it is as good a prep as some will get for it.
Then rest them in the Sri Lanka tour not the India one is I suspect his point. 'twas amusing banter from Dickwella directed at Bairstow though, so there is that
The Sibley one was the best exchange. "you going to be opening in India?" "Don't know I haven't had a very good series."

To be fair it is only really Buttler and Curran of the potential "best 11" missing for part of the India series. Bairstow* is only a bit part fixture of the test side and unlikely to be involved in the summer or ashes. Even then a case can be made for Curran and the seamers being interchangeable.

*I get that Sky and TMS has a thing for Jonny and he is decent against spin but the younger lads have come in and deserve the same chances he received. Since the start of the series in SA in 15/16, when we thought he'd kick on, he is averaging 38. Since the start of the summer 2018 he is averaging 25. A career average of 35 isn't terrible, but it doesn't merit repeated chances and the media trying to shoehorn him in ahead of younger prospects.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Lizard »

NZ confirmed as WTC finalist.

I'll be over here drinking Big 3 Fans' Tears.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Sibley 50. Good job. He's done well. It was slow going for a while, but they've built a platform.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

The slow going is a much better idea than those tests we've tried to up/maintain a scoring rate and lost wickets. Root said before the match it's very much trying to out patience the other side when conditions are like this
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Digby wrote:The slow going is a much better idea than those tests we've tried to up/maintain a scoring rate and lost wickets. Root said before the match it's very much trying to out patience the other side when conditions are like this
Well, they did it, as Ashwin was bowling cheaply until suddenly he wasn't... and Kohli had to turn elsewhere...runs came.

Good batting. Patient batting. I'm liking this lockdown Root. He's even better than before.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Another century for Root and Sibley still hanging in there. In fact scoring quicker and quicker. Going well for England.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9254
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Which Tyler »

Sibley just needs to keep the strike for these last few overs
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Which Tyler wrote:Sibley just needs to keep the strike for these last few overs
Well...
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

A quality day's work from both sides really. Some mistakes as tiredness set in, but that's to be expected. It's not always the case test cricket is a sustained test, this was, and unless we bin it in the first session tomorrow we're in a very strong position
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:A quality day's work from both sides really. Some mistakes as tiredness set in, but that's to be expected. It's not always the case test cricket is a sustained test, this was, and unless we bin it in the first session tomorrow we're in a very strong position
But we are gonna bin it in the first session tomorrow though, aren't we? Let's be realistic. All out with maybe another 40 runs on the board.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:
Digby wrote:A quality day's work from both sides really. Some mistakes as tiredness set in, but that's to be expected. It's not always the case test cricket is a sustained test, this was, and unless we bin it in the first session tomorrow we're in a very strong position
But we are gonna bin it in the first session tomorrow though, aren't we? Let's be realistic. All out with maybe another 40 runs on the board.

Puja
I honestly can't ever see us getting a "par" score... we're not going to score another 120-140, we'll either get another 50-60 or another 230+...

We've got Stokes, Pope and Buttler to come, we should have plenty of runs left in the tank.
Post Reply