Cricket fred
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
I know there are foot marks, but this ball is pitching a long way outside the leg stump and the umpires don't seem bothered, this isn't what I'd expect to be allowed ball after ball
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Cricket fred
Hmmm, no point batting beyond that wicket being lost, already ,400+ up, and surely want as long as reasonably possible to bowl them out
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Cricket fred
Even kes point now with 2 new batsmen, which will inevitably slow the scoring rate.
You've got enough of a lead, if you're not getting an extra 4 per over then why bother? Especially if you've got your bowlers out there anyway, so they're not exactly recuperating
You've got enough of a lead, if you're not getting an extra 4 per over then why bother? Especially if you've got your bowlers out there anyway, so they're not exactly recuperating
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Give how much Leach is coming down the pitch playing shots alongside Archer running down the pitch I'd be willing to guess what they're still doing out there
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Cricket fred
Fair point, but it's not buying us Indian wickets.
We've already set them a new world record run chase.
Nice little freebee confidence booster for Ashwin there, ahead of the 2nd test
We've already set them a new world record run chase.
Nice little freebee confidence booster for Ashwin there, ahead of the 2nd test
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
Insanity.
Well, at least we'll have a few overs of new ball. Who will get it? Anderson surely, but will the other end go to a spinner?
Well, at least we'll have a few overs of new ball. Who will get it? Anderson surely, but will the other end go to a spinner?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
I don't perhaps agree with not wanting more overs, but this way the ball will be harder come the start of play tomorrow when our bowlers are fresher, and we'll still get plenty of overs with a 2nd new ball at it's best if needed.
Uneven bounce from Archer, really quite low. India might need to not drive unless it's well pitched up
Uneven bounce from Archer, really quite low. India might need to not drive unless it's well pitched up
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Leach struggling, perhaps with the hard ball, perhaps just struggling
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
I'm not sure he's actually that good... unfortunately.Digby wrote:Leach struggling, perhaps with the hard ball, perhaps just struggling
Pujara is the worry. He can easily stick around for the whole day. Need an Anderson special, I feel, or Jofra to find another gear, or some golden arm from Root.
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
I didnt see much point in batting on after we reached a lead of 400. We could have had another 7/8 overs at India today and still been perfectly fresh to resume in the morning.
Lovely ball from Leach to get the wicket. More of that required.
Lovely ball from Leach to get the wicket. More of that required.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Captains tend to be cautious, and we don't have Swann anymore. I can't say I blame Root for not trusting Leach and Bess
If the game is about the 20-25 overs of each of the new balls it doesn't make much difference to us. The only other threat we might have is Anderson and his reverse swing. Much more likely this comes down to how much India want to save the game
If the game is about the 20-25 overs of each of the new balls it doesn't make much difference to us. The only other threat we might have is Anderson and his reverse swing. Much more likely this comes down to how much India want to save the game
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Good decision to bat on!
All round top effort from England.
All round top effort from England.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
I don't think we let a session of cricket go past that we didn't compete well in, yes sometimes India edged it but that was impressive from the call at the toss to the last wicket. I don't know if that's the best England win, but it's one of the most consistent strong displays in a game for sure
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
A really good response from India after going 3 down, not sure what England are trying to do other than hope their spinners get control of line and length (which would be an odd thing given how how many years they've bowled without that)
Interesting to see how batsman now sweep so happily to the ball wide of off stump, that's a new challenge to the finger spinner and especially the ones who only go one way
Interesting to see how batsman now sweep so happily to the ball wide of off stump, that's a new challenge to the finger spinner and especially the ones who only go one way
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
6 down now, but by heavens this is a day 3 or 4 pitch already. India will be pleased to have runs in the bank
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Cricket fred
They'll be even more pleased to have the better spin bowlersDigby wrote:6 down now, but by heavens this is a day 3 or 4 pitch already. India will be pleased to have runs in the bank
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
Yet on the first test showing, we oddly have the better players of spin...Which Tyler wrote:They'll be even more pleased to have the better spin bowlersDigby wrote:6 down now, but by heavens this is a day 3 or 4 pitch already. India will be pleased to have runs in the bank
Maybe suggesting our spinners aren’t actually that bad or that India’s aren’t actually that good...
If we can keep them under 350, we have a chance
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
But why the hell is root bowling with the new ball?!
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
That's a big 300 on this track.Kohli's review of his clean-bowl was most unusual...shame..
Pant could disrupt things a bit tomorrow.Can only think Root had some cunning plan, but not clear tbh.
Pant could disrupt things a bit tomorrow.Can only think Root had some cunning plan, but not clear tbh.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Root is getting spin bowling much faster, so why not take the new ball and get the bounce too.
And Kohli, for all that was actually very funny given just how out he was, is likely to be in quite a lot of trouble. Though they might only fine him and then even if it's a big fine that's nothing to Kohli. If they don't act on this they're condoning abuse being directed at the umpires. I hope at least it encourages our top order not to drive expansively and to try and make India bowl well over 100 overs, we'll see
And Kohli, for all that was actually very funny given just how out he was, is likely to be in quite a lot of trouble. Though they might only fine him and then even if it's a big fine that's nothing to Kohli. If they don't act on this they're condoning abuse being directed at the umpires. I hope at least it encourages our top order not to drive expansively and to try and make India bowl well over 100 overs, we'll see
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Cricket fred
This is the England I remember from the 90s and early 00s.
Will India enforce the follow-on?
Will India enforce the follow-on?
- Puja
- Posts: 17693
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
In fairness, this is a horrible bloody pitch. Ashwin is literally unplayable on this surface and India have tightened the screw well.Which Tyler wrote:This is the England I remember from the 90s and early 00s.
Will India enforce the follow-on?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Yep, I think had we batted superbly we might have added 70-80 more. Variable bounce, sometimes significant bounce and sharp spin makes this a lottery, maybe the ball does fly just wide of your bat and off stump often enough you get to 50, but that's going to be down to dumb luck more than the batsman
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
India have bowled and batted on a very poor Test wicket better than Eng, they probably knew they would.
This match is a goner know so they'll have to take it on the chin.
This match is a goner know so they'll have to take it on the chin.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Kohli does love a whinge, to the point of now contesting a DRS. Visually I did think Root was out lbw but what value is there in telling the umpire the DRS ball tracking is wrong? And at what point does the game sit on one of its absolute stars?