Cricket fred

Post Reply
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

The thing is, they just know to dangle wide ones at all the kids and they'll chase them like a lab chases its tail.

Awful batting. Crawley, Pope and Bracey just terrible performances.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:It wasn't even stupid batting this time, the ball started to do a bit and we just couldn't defend it, and tbf it's not the strongest batting lineup seen in test cricket
No, probably the worst I can remember in truth, and that's a loooong time. And its far from NZ's strongest attack.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:The thing is, they just know to dangle wide ones at all the kids and they'll chase them like a lab chases its tail.

Awful batting. Crawley, Pope and Bracey just terrible performances.
Bracey has been a pretty bad pick so far....Buttler played for Lancs yesterday! Golden duck today, duck at Lords, and a pretty average keeping display- I know he's 4th (?) choice, but...
Last edited by Banquo on Thu Jun 10, 2021 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:God we're crap without Stokes, aren't we?

We'll be lucky to get 250 at this rate. And then they'll punish us for 350+, probably...whereby Sibley will ride in on his white horse and block a nice 50 off 300 balls to "save" the series.
we have a distinct lack of quality batsman full stop, and missing Stokes, Bairstow and Buttler doesn't help, esp when Root's form is so shaky.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

I make that 5 of 7 out to badly executed attacking shots. poor
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Whereas I gave up watching and went with the tennis instead
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:Whereas I gave up watching and went with the tennis instead
says much :lol:
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Good effort from Burns, Lawrence, Stone and Wood. Well done to NZ.

But most of all, great to have a crowd....and they loved it too. Gotta love the outfits....coronavirus being chased by Boris with a syringe was a highlight.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17693
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

258-7 is a result given some of the positions we found ourselves in. You'd've said that, if we can get 300+, that's a score that it's possible to win with if we bowl decently.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:258-7 is a result given some of the positions we found ourselves in. You'd've said that, if we can get 300+, that's a score that it's possible to win with if we bowl decently.

Puja
Lots of ifs there, pooj...

I’m sure we’ll take 5 wickets with an old man, Bruce banner (before he turns into the hulk), a man with an invisible horse who “doesn’t drink”, an unproven kid, and captain fantastic and his dodgy back.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Overcast tomorrow, so would expect a similar mixed bag from NZ.
meanwhile..'Ollie Robinson is taking indefinite leave from cricket and will not be representing Sussex until further notice..'
quel surpris: what a sickener for the guy - what a mess; who's next up ?
Needs to be a push-back somehow.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

Either a pushback and admit they got it wrong in banning Robinson, or consistency in banning others like Anderson too
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote:Overcast tomorrow, so would expect a similar mixed bag from NZ.
meanwhile..'Ollie Robinson is taking indefinite leave from cricket and will not be representing Sussex until further notice..'
quel surpris: what a sickener for the guy - what a mess; who's next up ?
Needs to be a push-back somehow.
Yeah posted that earlier- they’ve certainly messed him up. Seems it’s more about appearances than any genuine intervention.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

NZ batsmen showing the sort of fortitude beyond our fellas at the mo. Though Broad and Anderson put great spells in....the back up is nowhere near as good, or good enough tbh.

This could get ugly.
fivepointer
Posts: 5895
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Well that was a handy wicket to get right at the end of play. Lawrence having a decent match. Wood and Stone have looked pretty average and we're missing a front line spin option.

NZ just look a cut above with bat and ball, showing far greater control, discipline and patience.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17693
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

fivepointer wrote:Well that was a handy wicket to get right at the end of play. Lawrence having a decent match. Wood and Stone have looked pretty average and we're missing a front line spin option.

NZ just look a cut above with bat and ball, showing far greater control, discipline and patience.
Stone looked to lose a bit of confidence after the captain showed his wankhands at slip to deny him a wicket.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Well that was a handy wicket to get right at the end of play. Lawrence having a decent match. Wood and Stone have looked pretty average and we're missing a front line spin option.

NZ just look a cut above with bat and ball, showing far greater control, discipline and patience.
yep.
We have been shambolic this morning. Poor Bracey having another mare.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Digby »

So apart from the dodgy batting lineup, dodgy keeper, insufficient seam attack, no spinner and dropping catches we're looking pretty well set
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:So apart from the dodgy batting lineup, dodgy keeper, insufficient seam attack, no spinner and dropping catches we're looking pretty well set
its a poor team, being done by NZ ' s weakened crew.

Still shouldnt be dropping catches
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

better after lunch to be fair
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

annoying last wicket stand, then predictably lose a wicket immediately.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

ffs
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Our batting...is shyte. Problem is.....who else?
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

jeez. Bracey to save the day. Could be all over today.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

There simply isn't a more fragile batting team in test cricket at the moment and it doesn't seem to matter who we select.

I'm struggling to remember a time when I didn't expect England to collapse every time they play a game.
Post Reply