Australia vs England - First Test

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Raggs »

I'd not have been against 2 reds, Hill deserved a yellow earlier for the slap to the face.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Oakboy »

If we don't win this by a big margin now it will be a disgrace even if it won't be that honourable.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

Which Tyler wrote:And.. it's been spotted.

Yellow for idiocy

Reaction always be harsher punishment, but shouldn't be that harsh IMO
not sure how can let a deliberate head to head go much as i sympatihise
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9322
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Which Tyler »

Banquo wrote:
Raggs wrote:Give them both yellows. Hills lucky not to have one by himself.
both reds if going that route- cant allow head butts
Agreed.
Not sure I'd call it a headbut, but as soon as an official says that, then it can only be a red.

Will also say that I missed most of the replays as wife needed me for work
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Raggs »

Which Tyler wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Raggs wrote:Give them both yellows. Hills lucky not to have one by himself.
both reds if going that route- cant allow head butts
Agreed.
Not sure I'd call it a headbut, but as soon as an official says that, then it can only be a red.
He butted his head into Hills head... what else can you call it?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Oakboy »

Itoje swapped sides. Interesting in terms of debate a few days ago.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:I'd not have been against 2 reds, Hill deserved a yellow earlier for the slap to the face.
aye but you cant have deliberate head to heads not redded when accidental ones are.
poor pass and option from faz
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Mellsblue »

Safe to say Farrell chose the wrong option there.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:Itoje swapped sides. Interesting in terms of debate a few days ago.
only lock we had so obvous swap
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Itoje swapped sides. Interesting in terms of debate a few days ago.
only lock we had so obvous swap
Lawes not a lock?
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Raggs »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Itoje swapped sides. Interesting in terms of debate a few days ago.
only lock we had so obvous swap
He means Itoje moved from loosehead lock to tighthead, like I said, I've never seen Lawes play tighthead lock.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Raggs »

That's harsh on Curry in my mind. The Aussie was in squeezeball position basically lying on the ball, Curry doesn't have to be on the ball in that situation, the fact he got the ball anyway should just be proof he was good at first.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5846
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Stom »

Raggs wrote:That's harsh on Curry in my mind. The Aussie was in squeezeball position basically lying on the ball, Curry doesn't have to be on the ball in that situation, the fact he got the ball anyway should just be proof he was good at first.
He was lying on the floor. It was idiotic.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9322
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Which Tyler »

Raggs wrote:He butted his head into Hills head... what else can you call it?
As said, I call it "something I didn't see"
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

we looked ok for a while.
Hill is a nob.
given the disruptons to oz and the red should win comfortably ya' d think
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Raggs »

Stom wrote:
Raggs wrote:That's harsh on Curry in my mind. The Aussie was in squeezeball position basically lying on the ball, Curry doesn't have to be on the ball in that situation, the fact he got the ball anyway should just be proof he was good at first.
He was lying on the floor. It was idiotic.
He believed he'd already fairly won the ball, not an unreasonable belief in my mind, especially without the ref giving any warning/info etc.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Itoje swapped sides. Interesting in terms of debate a few days ago.
only lock we had so obvous swap
He means Itoje moved from loosehead lock to tighthead, like I said, I've never seen Lawes play tighthead lock.
i understood that part- forgot lawes was on tbf- andItoje has more of a tighthead lock build
Scrumhead
Posts: 6001
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Scrumhead »

@Banquo agreed. The big pause from the injury to Banks took all the energy out of the game. Until that point England were clearly on top and playing pretty well. Second quarter was scrappy and crap from both sides.
Last edited by Scrumhead on Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Itoje swapped sides. Interesting in terms of debate a few days ago.
only lock we had so obvous swap
Lawes not a lock?
id missed lawes tbf, but see above re itoje
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:we looked ok for a while.
Hill is a nob.
given the disruptons to oz and the red should win comfortably ya' d think
Yep. Great first 20mins but error strewn ever since.
As you say, with the red and second choice 3, 10 & 15 you’d hope for a strong second half.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote: only lock we had so obvous swap
Lawes not a lock?
id missed lawes tbf, but see above re itoje
Lawes isn’t a lock anymore. Especially at scrum time given the weight he’s lost.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12209
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Mikey Brown »

Raggs wrote:Someone needs to get Hill off the pitch, he's completely lost his head with that Aussie lock with the hair. He's slapped in the face, now grabbed his hair/ear and yanked his head back in the maul.
Ah. Missed the build up to that. Only saw the headbutt which looked incredibly dumb, but does sound like Hill was asking for it.

I guess job done. Cynical as it is.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

hartley has it right, doing well at the tackle line just need to do summat withit
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Banquo »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Raggs wrote:Someone needs to get Hill off the pitch, he's completely lost his head with that Aussie lock with the hair. He's slapped in the face, now grabbed his hair/ear and yanked his head back in the maul.
Ah. Missed the build up to that. Only saw the headbutt which looked incredibly dumb, but does sound like Hill was asking for it.

I guess job done. Cynical as it is.
fraid so
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Australia vs England - First Test

Post by Raggs »

Still liking the look of our attack to be honest, it's flowing well, even with the errors, they're adjusting to the system/players errors in my mind, the system itself seems very effective.
Post Reply