Snap General Election called

Post Reply
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Which Tyler wrote:
That rich history of British political satire :D
User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Zhivago »

Sandydragon wrote:
Zhivago wrote:The only palatable candidate is Wallace. All others are trash.
He would be my pick out of the obvious candidates.
I also wouldn't mind Tugendhat, but I'm not sure he's in the running.

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Zhivago »

Which Tyler wrote:
Zhivago wrote:The only palatable candidate is Wallace. All others are trash.
I've said it before (twice), and I'll say it again - Larry Mouser for PM
I agree - he'd be purrfect

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7847
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by morepork »

Dear God will the man not take the hint and just fuck off?!
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Which Tyler wrote:
That is fucking hilarious.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

FB_IMG_1657223836576.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Backist Monk
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Zhivago wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
Zhivago wrote:The only palatable candidate is Wallace. All others are trash.
He would be my pick out of the obvious candidates.
I also wouldn't mind Tugendhat, but I'm not sure he's in the running.
I’d like him to have some proper ministerial responsibility first, so one for the future.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

It looks like Boris hasn’t submitted his resignation to the queen. I assumed that he needed to speak to the palace first and once the queen had accepted his resignation, then brief the media etc.

Instead he has promised to resign once a new leader is found. I’m sure May and Cameron both resigned as prime minister and agreed to continue until a replacement was found. Why do I have a feeling that Boris is trying to pull a fast one?
User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Zhivago »

Sandydragon wrote:It looks like Boris hasn’t submitted his resignation to the queen. I assumed that he needed to speak to the palace first and once the queen had accepted his resignation, then brief the media etc.

Instead he has promised to resign once a new leader is found. I’m sure May and Cameron both resigned as prime minister and agreed to continue until a replacement was found. Why do I have a feeling that Boris is trying to pull a fast one?
cos he's a liar

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4542
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Galfon »

If he is forced out of office before 30 July, he well be hoping the new incumbent is of a generous nature ..
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/c ... 18263.html
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Galfon wrote:If he is forced out of office before 30 July, he well be hoping the new incumbent is of a generous nature ..
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/c ... 18263.html
Send him the bill
User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Zhivago »

Sandydragon wrote:
Zhivago wrote:
Sandydragon wrote: He would be my pick out of the obvious candidates.
I also wouldn't mind Tugendhat, but I'm not sure he's in the running.
I’d like him to have some proper ministerial responsibility first, so one for the future.
Ben Wallace as PM
Tom Tugendhat as Home Secretary
Tobias Ellwood as Defence Secretary
Lucy Allan as Chancellor
Richard Graham as Foreign Secretary

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

So Labour will table a no confidence vote- do they need a 2/3 majority to get parliament dissolved and an election?
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4542
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Galfon »

Banquo wrote:So Labour will table a no confidence vote- do they need a 2/3 majority to get parliament dissolved and an election?
Looks like it..
'An early parliamentary general election is to take place if—
the number of members who vote in favour of the motion is a number equal to or greater than two thirds of the number of seats in the House (including vacant seats).'

'The Queen has a duty to appoint as PM the MP best placed to command the confidence of the Commons. That duty only arises once it is clear who is best placed. The Queen has no residual discretion.'
(i.e. sorted somehow in the House..)

As the hard-working MP's are due the Summer recess in 2 weeks,
they'd have to get pedalling.
Can't see the Tories wanting the throw the baby out with the bathwater. :|
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Galfon wrote:
Banquo wrote:So Labour will table a no confidence vote- do they need a 2/3 majority to get parliament dissolved and an election?
Looks like it..
'An early parliamentary general election is to take place if—
the number of members who vote in favour of the motion is a number equal to or greater than two thirds of the number of seats in the House (including vacant seats).'

'The Queen has a duty to appoint as PM the MP best placed to command the confidence of the Commons. That duty only arises once it is clear who is best placed. The Queen has no residual discretion.'
(i.e. sorted somehow in the House..)

As the hard-working MP's are due the Summer recess in 2 weeks,
they'd have to get pedalling.
Can't see the Tories wanting the throw the baby out with the bathwater. :|
I had thought they only needed a majority - the 2/3rd thing was with the fixed term parliaments act, which is no longer law. I thought if a vote showed that the house did not have confidence in the government, then the government had to go down?

I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15725
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mellsblue »

Puja wrote: I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
I had assumed this was in the t&c’s when we signed up? If I need to state it every time I make a post I’m not 100% on I’m going to have to tell the family they won’t be seeing as much of me.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15725
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mellsblue »

Sandydragon wrote:
Zhivago wrote:
Sandydragon wrote: He would be my pick out of the obvious candidates.
I also wouldn't mind Tugendhat, but I'm not sure he's in the running.
I’d like him to have some proper ministerial responsibility first, so one for the future.
Here’s his pitch:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/20 ... -minister/
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:
Galfon wrote:
Banquo wrote:So Labour will table a no confidence vote- do they need a 2/3 majority to get parliament dissolved and an election?
Looks like it..
'An early parliamentary general election is to take place if—
the number of members who vote in favour of the motion is a number equal to or greater than two thirds of the number of seats in the House (including vacant seats).'

'The Queen has a duty to appoint as PM the MP best placed to command the confidence of the Commons. That duty only arises once it is clear who is best placed. The Queen has no residual discretion.'
(i.e. sorted somehow in the House..)

As the hard-working MP's are due the Summer recess in 2 weeks,
they'd have to get pedalling.
Can't see the Tories wanting the throw the baby out with the bathwater. :|
I had thought they only needed a majority - the 2/3rd thing was with the fixed term parliaments act, which is no longer law. I thought if a vote showed that the house did not have confidence in the government, then the government had to go down?

I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
Its no lose for labour tbh- the vote if carried leads to an election the tories can't win (not least cos Boris would probs be leader) and if as more likely doesn't win, they can just point to Tories voting to keep Boris at the helm, even if as caretaker.

Meanwhile, Rome is burning.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15725
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote: Meanwhile, Rome is burning.
You’ve seen the covid rates on the continent then :)
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: Meanwhile, Rome is burning.
You’ve seen the covid rates on the continent then :)
aye, gone a bit bonkers
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Puja wrote:
Galfon wrote:
Banquo wrote:So Labour will table a no confidence vote- do they need a 2/3 majority to get parliament dissolved and an election?
Looks like it..
'An early parliamentary general election is to take place if—
the number of members who vote in favour of the motion is a number equal to or greater than two thirds of the number of seats in the House (including vacant seats).'

'The Queen has a duty to appoint as PM the MP best placed to command the confidence of the Commons. That duty only arises once it is clear who is best placed. The Queen has no residual discretion.'
(i.e. sorted somehow in the House..)

As the hard-working MP's are due the Summer recess in 2 weeks,
they'd have to get pedalling.
Can't see the Tories wanting the throw the baby out with the bathwater. :|
I had thought they only needed a majority - the 2/3rd thing was with the fixed term parliaments act, which is no longer law. I thought if a vote showed that the house did not have confidence in the government, then the government had to go down?

I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
Yes, I think the 2/3s bit was all about the fixed term act. Traditionally, losing a no confidence vote by any margin was enough
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Mellsblue wrote:
Puja wrote: I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
I had assumed this was in the t&c’s when we signed up? If I need to state it every time I make a post I’m not 100% on I’m going to have to tell the family they won’t be seeing as much of me.
FFS, you both need to try harder. This board demands perfection or else the inability to admit to not being entirely correct all of the time! :D
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

Sandydragon wrote:
Puja wrote:
Galfon wrote: Looks like it..
'An early parliamentary general election is to take place if—
the number of members who vote in favour of the motion is a number equal to or greater than two thirds of the number of seats in the House (including vacant seats).'

'The Queen has a duty to appoint as PM the MP best placed to command the confidence of the Commons. That duty only arises once it is clear who is best placed. The Queen has no residual discretion.'
(i.e. sorted somehow in the House..)

As the hard-working MP's are due the Summer recess in 2 weeks,
they'd have to get pedalling.
Can't see the Tories wanting the throw the baby out with the bathwater. :|
I had thought they only needed a majority - the 2/3rd thing was with the fixed term parliaments act, which is no longer law. I thought if a vote showed that the house did not have confidence in the government, then the government had to go down?

I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
Yes, I think the 2/3s bit was all about the fixed term act. Traditionally, losing a no confidence vote by any margin was enough
Is the FTA fully obliterated?
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4542
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Galfon »

Banquo wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
Puja wrote:
I had thought they only needed a majority - the 2/3rd thing was with the fixed term parliaments act, which is no longer law. I thought if a vote showed that the house did not have confidence in the government, then the government had to go down?

I reserve the right to be wrong, at all times.

Puja
Yes, I think the 2/3s bit was all about the fixed term act. Traditionally, losing a no confidence vote by any margin was enough
Is the FTA fully obliterated?
it appears so, this year..
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/trie ... s-restored

standing corrected :)
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

The first line of the Dissolution and Calling of Parliaments Act is that the FTA is repealed, with no exceptions identified. Everything seems to point towards it being a simple majority of the votes cast.
Post Reply