Team for Italy

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
francoisfou
Posts: 2524
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: Team for Italy

Post by francoisfou »

Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:03 pm
fivepointer wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:52 pm Kelly not available so SB is left with Hobsons choice at 12.
Farrell again, an over the hill Tuilagi or out of position Slade or Lawrence.
Its not a choice to relish.
Shame Dingwall's form hasn't been that good tbh.
Mark Atkinson's another who's a bit unlucky not to have been given a chance, and Sam James too.
But if Borthers doesn't drop Smith to the bench and move his outstanding captain to 10, then this is all pointless speculation, innit?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Oakboy »

fivepointer wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:14 pm
Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:03 pm
fivepointer wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:52 pm Kelly not available so SB is left with Hobsons choice at 12.
Farrell again, an over the hill Tuilagi or out of position Slade or Lawrence.
Its not a choice to relish.
Shame Dingwall's form hasn't been that good tbh.
He looked good for a bit but hasnt followed through. What does SB do? His options are so limited in this position that he has to make a compromise selection.
Yes, Farrell is an awful 12 but anyone else (including Kelly) might be a poor option too.
Fast forward a year and we might have Kelly, Atkinson and Ojomoh as options. Right now we are f*****d!
I'd pick Farrell, Slade and Marchant for this game. I'd like to see Smith, Lawrence and Slade but it won't happen.

I'd also risk Mitchell on the bench in place of Youngs.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Oakboy »

francoisfou wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:18 pm
Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:03 pm
fivepointer wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:52 pm Kelly not available so SB is left with Hobsons choice at 12.
Farrell again, an over the hill Tuilagi or out of position Slade or Lawrence.
Its not a choice to relish.
Shame Dingwall's form hasn't been that good tbh.
Mark Atkinson's another who's a bit unlucky not to have been given a chance, and Sam James too.
But if Borthers doesn't drop Smith to the bench and move his outstanding captain to 10, then this is all pointless speculation, innit?
I think picking Smith AND Farrell again would be rather daft. After their performance against Scotland it is vital to have an alternative, any alternative, for when we meet France and Ireland. Now is the time for change.
FKAS
Posts: 8468
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by FKAS »

francoisfou wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:18 pm
Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:03 pm
fivepointer wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:52 pm Kelly not available so SB is left with Hobsons choice at 12.
Farrell again, an over the hill Tuilagi or out of position Slade or Lawrence.
Its not a choice to relish.
Shame Dingwall's form hasn't been that good tbh.
Mark Atkinson's another who's a bit unlucky not to have been given a chance, and Sam James too.
But if Borthers doesn't drop Smith to the bench and move his outstanding captain to 10, then this is all pointless speculation, innit?
Didn't Mark Atkinson have an absolute shocker against the Baabaas or is my memory deserting me?

Sam James is one I'm really surprised doesn't have more caps. His size and skill set makes him a really useful player at Prem Level, surely at least worth a look.
rjjb
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2022 7:19 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by rjjb »

Telegraph & Independent (websites) both hinting at a very different back three on Sunday. Not sure what it's based on - spot the bibs?
oldprussians
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:58 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by oldprussians »

I think Farrell will get a red card
Margin_Walker
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:11 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Margin_Walker »

Yeah, think it's just spot the bibs. In the training shots today Arundell and Slade were wearing white bibs, which seemed to be worn by first team types. Steward noticeably was in the 'others' blue bib.

Could be indicative of a change, or could be absolutely nothing. Just what they were wearing for a run of plays.
ckeyn
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:51 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by ckeyn »

Willis in the frame to start ahead of B Curry. Times suggesting Watson too.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Mellsblue »

Sinfield has made a big thing of letting the players know who will be in the team and training as that team at the front end of the week. Bibs may be a better indicator than under other regimes.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Puja »

ckeyn wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 8:55 pm Willis in the frame to start ahead of B Curry. Times suggesting Watson too.
I haven't rewatched the whole game yet, but I think Curry's unlucky if he's the one making way. Out of the back row against Scotland, the order from worst to best was Dombrandt, Isiekwe, Curry, Earl, gap, Ludlam.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17739
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Puja »

Mellsblue wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 8:55 pm Sinfield has made a big thing of letting the players know who will be in the team and training as that team at the front end of the week. Bibs may be a better indicator than under other regimes.
I do like that. There's surely not a huge amount to be gained by subterfuge and the benefits to team cohesion must be immense.

Puja
Backist Monk
Danno
Posts: 2630
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Danno »

Puja wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 9:32 pm
ckeyn wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 8:55 pm Willis in the frame to start ahead of B Curry. Times suggesting Watson too.
I haven't rewatched the whole game yet, but I think Curry's unlucky if he's the one making way. Out of the back row against Scotland, the order from worst to best was Dombrandt, Isiekwe, Curry, Earl, gap, Ludlam.

Puja
Would switch Dombrandt and Isiekwe (doing something better than literally nothing)
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by p/d »

9. Given up caring
10. Either or
12. Lawrence
13. Slade

Back 3 of Watson, Arundell and Steward

Bosh. Job done
SixAndAHalf
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:13 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by SixAndAHalf »

1. Genge
2. George
3. Cole (Sinckler)
4. Itoje
5. Chessum
6. Willis (Ludlam)
7. Earl (Willis)
8. Ludlam (Dombrandt)

9. JvP
10. Farrell
11. Freeman (Arundell)
12. Manu
13. Slade
14. Watson
15. Steward

16. Walker
17. Rodd
18. Sinckler (Cole)
19. Ribbans
20. Dombrandt (Earl)
21. Mitchell
22. Smith
23. Arundell (OHC)

Brackets = Borthers picks

We miss Ford. And also need Mercer back asap - unconvinced by Dombrandt as an international.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Banquo »

SixAndAHalf wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:32 pm 1. Genge
2. George
3. Cole (Sinckler)
4. Itoje
5. Chessum
6. Willis (Ludlam)
7. Earl (Willis)
8. Ludlam (Dombrandt)

9. JvP
10. Farrell
11. Freeman (Arundell)
12. Manu
13. Slade
14. Watson
15. Steward

16. Walker
17. Rodd
18. Sinckler (Cole)
19. Ribbans
20. Dombrandt (Earl)
21. Mitchell
22. Smith
23. Arundell (OHC)

Brackets = Borthers picks

We miss Ford. And also need Mercer back asap - unconvinced by Dombrandt as an international.
pretty much. Good to see you back!
Danno
Posts: 2630
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Danno »

We're in a right fucking mess aren't we.

No depth in the front row.
One lock guaranteed to start. And he's taking a lot of grief (I happen to agree in general - not the player he was, or currently should be)
Can't make a decision in the back row if Curry (T) goes down
Half backs. Lol.
Midfield. Just not funny any more.
Wings....?
FB. Stew's taking flak for his last line of def now.

Bench. Well, see above.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Banquo »

Danno wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:43 pm We're in a right fucking mess aren't we.
yes and no. Yes because we are short of excellent players and wedded still to the notion that the likes of Farrell are key; no because we do have some very good established players, and some emerging talent, and as per morecambe and wise we just have to get them in the right order!

Should be able to build a side round Genge, Sinckler, Itoje, Chessum, Ribbans, Hills, Currys, Willis's, JVP, Smiths, Freeman Watson, Arundell, Lawrence, Slade, Marchant, Steward.....and hopefully others improve and emerge.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Spiffy »

Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:57 pm
Danno wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:43 pm We're in a right fucking mess aren't we.
yes and no. Yes because we are short of excellent players and wedded still to the notion that the likes of Farrell are key; no because we do have some very good established players, and some emerging talent, and as per morecambe and wise we just have to get them in the right order!

Should be able to build a side round Genge, Sinckler, Itoje, Chessum, Ribbans, Hills, Currys, Willis's, JVP, Smiths, Freeman Watson, Arundell, Lawrence, Slade, Marchant, Steward.....and hopefully others improve and emerge.
You have listed some very talented players there and it certainly should be possible to build a good team around that kind of core. Still - a lot of them are no better than their established or emerging counterparts in other 6N teams, so any kind of physical or skill advantage to England is not evident at present. More important, the real key is to get them playing cohesively and developing a team approach where they are comfortable with each other and with the game plan, and understand their specific roles. Most great teams in the past have been more than the sum of the parts. This seems to be England's major problem at the moment. They don't appear to know how they want to play the game; and they are bogged down with a few poor but key selections that they seem unwilling to change.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:57 pm
Danno wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:43 pm We're in a right fucking mess aren't we.
yes and no. Yes because we are short of excellent players and wedded still to the notion that the likes of Farrell are key; no because we do have some very good established players, and some emerging talent, and as per morecambe and wise we just have to get them in the right order!

Should be able to build a side round Genge, Sinckler, Itoje, Chessum, Ribbans, Hills, Currys, Willis's, JVP, Smiths, Freeman Watson, Arundell, Lawrence, Slade, Marchant, Steward.....and hopefully others improve and emerge.
Do you see any international future for Ford and Lawes? Injuries have excluded them but might one argue that should injuries to others put them back in the 10/6 shirts the overall standard of the team would improve?

SB does have the dilemma of short-term results v building a team. Assuming everyone was fit, for a one-off, must-win game tomorrow, I'd start Marler, Lawes and Ford at 1, 6, 10 (and I've never been a Ford fan). Scrum, line-out and game management would improve immediately with those three on the pitch.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by p/d »

no room for 12t?
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Banquo »

Spiffy wrote: Wed Feb 08, 2023 1:30 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:57 pm
Danno wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:43 pm We're in a right fucking mess aren't we.
yes and no. Yes because we are short of excellent players and wedded still to the notion that the likes of Farrell are key; no because we do have some very good established players, and some emerging talent, and as per morecambe and wise we just have to get them in the right order!

Should be able to build a side round Genge, Sinckler, Itoje, Chessum, Ribbans, Hills, Currys, Willis's, JVP, Smiths, Freeman Watson, Arundell, Lawrence, Slade, Marchant, Steward.....and hopefully others improve and emerge.
You have listed some very talented players there and it certainly should be possible to build a good team around that kind of core. Still - a lot of them are no better than their established or emerging counterparts in other 6N teams, so any kind of physical or skill advantage to England is not evident at present. More important, the real key is to get them playing cohesively and developing a team approach where they are comfortable with each other and with the game plan, and understand their specific roles. Most great teams in the past have been more than the sum of the parts. This seems to be England's major problem at the moment. They don't appear to know how they want to play the game; and they are bogged down with a few poor but key selections that they seem unwilling to change.
I didn't make any claim of superiority, but they should be able to perform well. My morecambe/wise reference is indeed a reference to selecting the right players and getting them doing the right things, and said wedded to the likes of Farrell. So we agree ;)
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12176
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Mikey Brown »

Mercer the convincing international... he's got some skills but it's not like he Tom Willis or Dan Kelly.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote: Wed Feb 08, 2023 8:48 am
Banquo wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:57 pm
Danno wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:43 pm We're in a right fucking mess aren't we.
yes and no. Yes because we are short of excellent players and wedded still to the notion that the likes of Farrell are key; no because we do have some very good established players, and some emerging talent, and as per morecambe and wise we just have to get them in the right order!

Should be able to build a side round Genge, Sinckler, Itoje, Chessum, Ribbans, Hills, Currys, Willis's, JVP, Smiths, Freeman Watson, Arundell, Lawrence, Slade, Marchant, Steward.....and hopefully others improve and emerge.
Do you see any international future for Ford and Lawes? Injuries have excluded them but might one argue that should injuries to others put them back in the 10/6 shirts the overall standard of the team would improve?

SB does have the dilemma of short-term results v building a team. Assuming everyone was fit, for a one-off, must-win game tomorrow, I'd start Marler, Lawes and Ford at 1, 6, 10 (and I've never been a Ford fan). Scrum, line-out and game management would improve immediately with those three on the pitch.
Fair on Lawes and Ford, I just missed them. Marler just seems to be a bit of a d*ck these days so not sure worth the effort.
ckeyn
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:51 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by ckeyn »

Freeman at 12 eventually? Saw some online commentary on the idea. Size, handling; runs a good line and a good inside defender.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Mellsblue »

The problem with that is he’s potentially a world class wing.
Post Reply