Cricket fred

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Compulsive hooking :(
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

In fairness to England in the field, Oz equally poor tbf
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Ponting spot on
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

For fcks sake. Such a waste, just leave it ya plonker. Great knock, but…
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Seriously, what the fck are they doing. Short bowling is tiring, ride it out. Lyon is out of the attack.
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Now Brook is dicking about and is lucky
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Banquo wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:11 pm Seriously, what the fck are they doing. Short bowling is tiring, ride it out. Lyon is out of the attack.
It's just utterly baffling. We've lost three wickets today and that is absolutely the correct phrasing - Australia haven't "taken" any of them, we've just lost them.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

What the actual fuck
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:26 pm What the actual fuck
quite. Root should know much much better. Absolute sucker punches.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

138 behind with 6 wickets in hand is a better position to end Day 2 on than I could've hoped for at the start. We need the Brooks and Stokes partnership to put on at least another 60 runs - if one gets out early tomorrow, then a lot of the good work will be undone - but it is a solid position, even with our elongated tail.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:37 pm 138 behind with 6 wickets in hand is a better position to end Day 2 on than I could've hoped for at the start. We need the Brooks and Stokes partnership to put on at least another 60 runs - if one gets out early tomorrow, then a lot of the good work will be undone - but it is a solid position, even with our elongated tail.

Puja
its good....but they all were out in pretty daft ways, even with bazball factor.
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

(ps Root didn'r deserve to still be in, but there were several angles showing that ball was touching grass....)
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Banquo wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 7:04 pm (ps Root didn'r deserve to still be in, but there were several angles showing that ball was touching grass....)
I did think that myself, but I am very fuzzy on what the laws actually are on those, so I assumed I was misunderstanding it.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Puja wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:37 pmWe need the Brooks and Stokes partnership to put on at least another 60 runs - if one gets out early tomorrow, then a lot of the good work will be undone.
Well fuck.

At least it was a genuine mistake rather than trying to launch a ball over where all the catchers are standing. Not that how he got out makes the match situation any better - we're theoretically still well in the game, but I can really see one of Brook/Bairstow getting out to a stupid heave and us being all out for 330.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Okay, so it looks like 330 might've been optimistic.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

There’s Bazball and there’s stupid shots. Now the Aussies will bounce us all series. With Lyon crocked we had every chance of winning this game by riding out the bouncers. Very poor decision making, esp Root tbh.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Sometimes it's not a treat being right.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

poor batting. series looks one way now
fivepointer
Posts: 5878
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Banquo wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:45 am There’s Bazball and there’s stupid shots. Now the Aussies will bounce us all series. With Lyon crocked we had every chance of winning this game by riding out the bouncers. Very poor decision making, esp Root tbh.
Yep. It was moronic. Crazy decision making and rotten execution. Bowlers havent done much in helpful conditions either.

Need a very big morning to get back into the game.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Feels like the first test was thrown away by inaccuracy, and the second will be thrown away by stupidity. So what'll happen to the third? Incompetence? Or will it all come together and we'll praise the team for amazing fortitude...
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Also, surely if Pope is out, Foakes has to come back in? Bairstow just is not good enough behind the sticks.
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

good bowling from both sides today, in different ways
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Speaking of me not really knowing how the grassed catches laws work...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/cricket/66077865

I have to say, that does look counter-intuitive to me. He's definitely caught that securely in two hands and it seems weird that him basically using his ball-carrying hand to avoid from face-planting counts as dropping it. Might be correct with the lawbook, but it doesn't look right, especially since I've seen catches where someone's barely had the ball in their hand a split second before throwing it up in the air in celebration.

I'll take it though - we are definitely due a bit of luck.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17605
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Pish. Hard to criticise someone for getting 98 and 83, but we did need Duckett to hang around for a bit longer today. 194 still to win - it's not impossible to do, but we need centuries from both Bairstow and Stokes. Our tail's far too long.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19058
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Sun Jul 02, 2023 12:17 pm Pish. Hard to criticise someone for getting 98 and 83, but we did need Duckett to hang around for a bit longer today. 194 still to win - it's not impossible to do, but we need centuries from both Bairstow and Stokes. Our tail's far too long.

Puja
correct. Its poor decision making again. Its actually feck all to do with Bazball as a strategy, but compulsive hooking by Duckett again.
Post Reply