I agree with this.Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2023 1:46 pmThe issue with Bairstow is that he’s literally cost at least one test…..and is in severe run debt and we have a demonstrably better option.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2023 1:45 pmI am resigned to him being retained all series. They are showing faith - it worked for Crawley (for certain values of worked, although I don't necessarily mind an opener who continuously and consistently gets between 20 and 45 - rather that than one that gets four 0-10s and then gets a 150 every so often. At least Crawley can be relied upon to last long enough to take some shine off the ball for the middle order), so they'll keep trying with Bairstow.
Puja
Also, and I don't get overlooking this...Bairstow is a pretty damn good outfielder. If he was a specialist batsman, he'd be a shoe in considering his work in the field.