England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17735
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Puja »

Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Oakboy »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
I'd say that the worst part of what you suggest is Vunipola on the bench ahead of better alternatives. Oddly enough, I hope one of the veterans is at 9. Otherwise, Mitchell could get lots of flak for just being part of such a turgid (but expected) back line. Having said that, at least SB seems intent on picking HIS best XV.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by p/d »

BV on bench just goes to highlight the folly of not farming him out on seeing red.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12175
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Mikey Brown »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
It’s on defence that I find the midfield (and the moving of Marchant) a lot more concerning.

I feel like Tuilagi has grown in to his role as a defender at 12, but doesn’t look nearly light enough on his feet these days to play wider, whilst Farrell introduces all sorts of confusion alongside his famed physicality.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17735
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Puja »

Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:01 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
It’s on defence that I find the midfield (and the moving of Marchant) a lot more concerning.

I feel like Tuilagi has grown in to his role as a defender at 12, but doesn’t look nearly light enough on his feet these days to play wider, whilst Farrell introduces all sorts of confusion alongside his famed physicality.
I wonder if the idea is to have Ford playing wing on defence so that they can use Marchant's organisational skills at 13 and move the lighter Ford away from traffic - he's an excellent tackler who completes a high percentage successfully, but he is vulnerable to giving up yards by being dragged backwards when big men run at him.

Again, it wouldn't be what I'd do, but it's an explanation for effectively having the midfield labelled as 13 and 14.

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12175
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Mikey Brown »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:24 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:01 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
It’s on defence that I find the midfield (and the moving of Marchant) a lot more concerning.

I feel like Tuilagi has grown in to his role as a defender at 12, but doesn’t look nearly light enough on his feet these days to play wider, whilst Farrell introduces all sorts of confusion alongside his famed physicality.
I wonder if the idea is to have Ford playing wing on defence so that they can use Marchant's organisational skills at 13 and move the lighter Ford away from traffic - he's an excellent tackler who completes a high percentage successfully, but he is vulnerable to giving up yards by being dragged backwards when big men run at him.

Again, it wouldn't be what I'd do, but it's an explanation for effectively having the midfield labelled as 13 and 14.

Puja
Could be, but I never quite understand the logistics of the flyhalf and winger (who might be on the far side) having to swap back and forth between changes of possession.

It hardly seems much more sensible than sticking Steward to the wing for Smith at fullback. Can Ford do a good goose step?
FKAS
Posts: 8468
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by FKAS »

Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:33 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:24 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:01 pm

It’s on defence that I find the midfield (and the moving of Marchant) a lot more concerning.

I feel like Tuilagi has grown in to his role as a defender at 12, but doesn’t look nearly light enough on his feet these days to play wider, whilst Farrell introduces all sorts of confusion alongside his famed physicality.
I wonder if the idea is to have Ford playing wing on defence so that they can use Marchant's organisational skills at 13 and move the lighter Ford away from traffic - he's an excellent tackler who completes a high percentage successfully, but he is vulnerable to giving up yards by being dragged backwards when big men run at him.

Again, it wouldn't be what I'd do, but it's an explanation for effectively having the midfield labelled as 13 and 14.

Puja
Could be, but I never quite understand the logistics of the flyhalf and winger (who might be on the far side) having to swap back and forth between changes of possession.

It hardly seems much more sensible than sticking Steward to the wing for Smith at fullback. Can Ford do a good goose step?
Sinfield doesn't use a traditional pendulum system in defence so moving Ford to the wing doesn't really happen. The wings tend to defend flat in the line with the flyhalf and fullback in the backfield. If the flyhalf gets caught in the line the scrum half drops in. Occasionally a winger drops back to cover for the fullback.

Keeps a kicking presence and then a chaser/aerial option in the backfield.
Margin_Walker
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:11 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Margin_Walker »

Which papers have this as the team?

I'm not believing any leaked team until the Mail or Times leak it.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by p/d »

I hate how resigned to and numb we have become to the hard man of Europe getting the nod at 12.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Stom »

Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:01 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
It’s on defence that I find the midfield (and the moving of Marchant) a lot more concerning.

I feel like Tuilagi has grown in to his role as a defender at 12, but doesn’t look nearly light enough on his feet these days to play wider, whilst Farrell introduces all sorts of confusion alongside his famed physicality.
Exactly. Marchant is such a good defender in midfield, and with Tuilagi alongside him, we have a great midfield defence. Take out Marchant, a great defender, and add in Farrell, a liability, and suddenly we're going to concede a shedload of meters through that midfield.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Oakboy »

p/d wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 2:08 pm I hate how resigned to and numb we have become to the hard man of Europe getting the nod at 12.
Let's face it, all he has to do is fart to get 8/10 from most pundits. Our protests about him just waste breath so it's easier to talk about other selections. He must have broken some sort of record for being so bad that we have stopped whingeing about his selection.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 2:17 pm
p/d wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 2:08 pm I hate how resigned to and numb we have become to the hard man of Europe getting the nod at 12.
Let's face it, all he has to do is fart to get 8/10 from most pundits. Our protests about him just waste breath so it's easier to talk about other selections. He must have broken some sort of record for being so bad that we have stopped whingeing about his selection.
If the Ice Man farts and doesn’t melt then 8/10 is too low, imo.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17735
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Puja »

Margin_Walker wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 2:01 pm Which papers have this as the team?

I'm not believing any leaked team until the Mail or Times leak it.
Guardian and Telegraph - the latter's usually got a fairly good line on leaks from the camp.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm , I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before.
Puja
Dear god, despite all the evidence....it last 'worked' eons ago when our pack was dominating, and only against poor opposition. Faz is a better 10 than 12, but a mediocre 10.

and fck Marchant on the wing.

Clueless back selection if so. The fact that we even try and make sense out of it shows we have Stockholm syndrome
rjjb
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2022 7:19 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by rjjb »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm Papers have rumours of team being 10-15 of Ford, May, Farrell, Manu, Marchant, Steward, and that the backrow will be Lawes/Curry/Earl, with BillyV on the bench.

If we *must* have Farrell starting (and apparently, we must), I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before. Not thrilled by Marchant on the wing, mind. His speed's not a liability, but he's not a real winger and it feels like we're neutralising part of our attacking threat so that we can crowbar the ICEMAN into the XV. Mind, we weren't using that attacking threat anyway, so I guess there's that.

The BillyV news is the more important bit to me and fantastic news to hear, if it's true. Good to know that we've recognised that playing two flankers is important.

Puja
"Crowbar" pretty much sums it up. Ford is probably compromised by Farrell's presence, Tuilagi isn't an OC these days & Marchant isn't a wing. It also means a relatively pedestrian backline to my eye.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Spiffy »

England will duly hump Samoa and learn nothing new in the process.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17735
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Puja »

FKAS wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:40 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:33 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:24 pm

I wonder if the idea is to have Ford playing wing on defence so that they can use Marchant's organisational skills at 13 and move the lighter Ford away from traffic - he's an excellent tackler who completes a high percentage successfully, but he is vulnerable to giving up yards by being dragged backwards when big men run at him.

Again, it wouldn't be what I'd do, but it's an explanation for effectively having the midfield labelled as 13 and 14.

Puja
Could be, but I never quite understand the logistics of the flyhalf and winger (who might be on the far side) having to swap back and forth between changes of possession.

It hardly seems much more sensible than sticking Steward to the wing for Smith at fullback. Can Ford do a good goose step?
Sinfield doesn't use a traditional pendulum system in defence so moving Ford to the wing doesn't really happen. The wings tend to defend flat in the line with the flyhalf and fullback in the backfield. If the flyhalf gets caught in the line the scrum half drops in. Occasionally a winger drops back to cover for the fullback.

Keeps a kicking presence and then a chaser/aerial option in the backfield.
Huh, interesting. I didn't know that was how it worked.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17735
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Puja »

Banquo wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:24 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm , I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before.
Puja
Dear god, despite all the evidence....it last 'worked' eons ago when our pack was dominating, and only against poor opposition. Faz is a better 10 than 12, but a mediocre 10.

and fck Marchant on the wing.

Clueless back selection if so. The fact that we even try and make sense out of it shows we have Stockholm syndrome
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I probably am, cause my memory's shithouse), but we haven't actually used Ford/Farrell since 2020, have we? I thought Ford was dumped shortly after we won the Autumn Nations Cup thingy and we've just had loads of attempts to make either Farrell at 10 or Smith/Farrell work.

So, "all the evidence" would include the last time we were actually good at the game.

Puja
Backist Monk
FKAS
Posts: 8468
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by FKAS »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:35 pm
FKAS wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:40 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:33 pm

Could be, but I never quite understand the logistics of the flyhalf and winger (who might be on the far side) having to swap back and forth between changes of possession.

It hardly seems much more sensible than sticking Steward to the wing for Smith at fullback. Can Ford do a good goose step?
Sinfield doesn't use a traditional pendulum system in defence so moving Ford to the wing doesn't really happen. The wings tend to defend flat in the line with the flyhalf and fullback in the backfield. If the flyhalf gets caught in the line the scrum half drops in. Occasionally a winger drops back to cover for the fullback.

Keeps a kicking presence and then a chaser/aerial option in the backfield.
Huh, interesting. I didn't know that was how it worked.

Puja
I'm sure someone somewhere has done a more detailed analysis than my observations. Ford is definitely positioned in the backfield with Steward though.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:40 pm
Banquo wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:24 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:33 pm , I still regard him as least damaging at 12, and I still don't mind Ford/Farrell as a combo as much as some others on here do - it's not what I would pick, but it has worked before.
Puja
Dear god, despite all the evidence....it last 'worked' eons ago when our pack was dominating, and only against poor opposition. Faz is a better 10 than 12, but a mediocre 10.

and fck Marchant on the wing.

Clueless back selection if so. The fact that we even try and make sense out of it shows we have Stockholm syndrome
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I probably am, cause my memory's shithouse), but we haven't actually used Ford/Farrell since 2020, have we? I thought Ford was dumped shortly after we won the Autumn Nations Cup thingy and we've just had loads of attempts to make either Farrell at 10 or Smith/Farrell work.

So, "all the evidence" would include the last time we were actually good at the game.

Puja
nah, its a rubbish combo and Faz is a rubbish 12. There are no other answers :)

(we weren't actually any good in 2020)....and btw they played together in the 2021 6N....
Last edited by Banquo on Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Oakboy »

WT's post about the results that should see SB sacked may need amending. Any game lost featuring Ford/Farrell starting at 10/12 does it for me. :lol:
Beasties
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Beasties »

What time do we get to find out what position Farrell is playing?
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by p/d »

Beasties wrote: Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:52 pm What time do we get to find out what position Farrell is playing?
do you mean 'who get's to play with Farrell?'
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12175
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Mikey Brown »

The Guardian have just announced* the same team as listed above with Marchant shifting to the wing to make space for Muhammed "I'm hard" Bruce Lee at 12.

*Announced in that way they seem to do now - going to great lengths to hit a huge word-count without actually listing a full team or fully committing to what they're saying.
Doofus
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:50 pm

Re: England vs Samoa - Sat 4.45pm

Post by Doofus »

BBC Announcement
England starting XV to face Samoa: Steward; Marchant, Tuilagi, Farrell (capt), May; Ford, Mitchell; Genge, George, Cole, Itoje, Chessum, Lawes, Curry, Earl.

Replacements: Dan, Marler, Sinckler, Martin, Vunipola, Care, Smith, Lawrence.
Last edited by Doofus on Thu Oct 05, 2023 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply