The final
Moderator: Puja
- bruce
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: The final
Not even a penalty for my money, no matter the crowds ooh and aahs
- bruce
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: The final
Don't understand that decision, take the 3 points
- Galfon
- Posts: 4296
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: The final
Juan Poynter does it again..
Two quality teams .Thought Barnes and his buddy got much right.

Two quality teams .Thought Barnes and his buddy got much right.
- UKHamlet
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:07 pm
- Location: Swansea
- Contact:
Re: The final
Anti-rugby wins. Dreadful final characterised by poor handling and won by a team scoring in multiples of 3.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
- Puja
- Posts: 17735
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: The final
I don't see it. The first contact is with the shoulder, so it's not direct.
Puja
Backist Monk
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: The final
Stats will be interesting.
SA have managed to be the most negative team to ever win a World Cup. Not sure that attracts new fans.
Also, Kilosi is a great player, but how his tackle merits a lower sanction that Cane’s is unexplainable.
SA have managed to be the most negative team to ever win a World Cup. Not sure that attracts new fans.
Also, Kilosi is a great player, but how his tackle merits a lower sanction that Cane’s is unexplainable.
- bruce
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: The final
Come off it. As I said earlier I didn't even think Kolisis was a penalty. It was a tight game between two good teams that cancelled each other out to some degree.canta_brian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:13 pm Stats will be interesting.
SA have managed to be the most negative team to ever win a World Cup. Not sure that attracts new fans.
Also, Kilosi is a great player, but how his tackle merits a lower sanction that Cane’s is unexplainable.
- bruce
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: The final
Oh and although Savea is a great player, take the points. Thats what lost this for NZ.
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The final
Well that was pretty dreadful.
I take the point about negative rugby, but that was hardly circus entertainers vs farm labourers, was it? NZ had more going forward perhaps, but not ENOUGH more to have any complaints IMO. They were the better side in the 2nd half, but only 5 points better when they needed 7. It's still a problem for the game's evolution IMO, that a team who can be so dazzlingly entertaining one week, can be so utterly nullified once they meet another team at their physical level. And that goes for both sides today, really. It's why France going out was a bad thing not just for France.
I take the point about negative rugby, but that was hardly circus entertainers vs farm labourers, was it? NZ had more going forward perhaps, but not ENOUGH more to have any complaints IMO. They were the better side in the 2nd half, but only 5 points better when they needed 7. It's still a problem for the game's evolution IMO, that a team who can be so dazzlingly entertaining one week, can be so utterly nullified once they meet another team at their physical level. And that goes for both sides today, really. It's why France going out was a bad thing not just for France.
- UKHamlet
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:07 pm
- Location: Swansea
- Contact:
Re: The final
Why NZ persist eith Mo'unga as a kicker completely escapes me.
- bruce
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: The final
How many medals do they have to give out ffs
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: The final
They won man. End of.canta_brian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:13 pm Stats will be interesting.
SA have managed to be the most negative team to ever win a World Cup. Not sure that attracts new fans.
Also, Kilosi is a great player, but how his tackle merits a lower sanction that Cane’s is unexplainable.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: The final
Job for a coach.Sourdust wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:21 pm Well that was pretty dreadful.
I take the point about negative rugby, but that was hardly circus entertainers vs farm labourers, was it? NZ had more going forward perhaps, but not ENOUGH more to have any complaints IMO. They were the better side in the 2nd half, but only 5 points better when they needed 7. It's still a problem for the game's evolution IMO, that a team who can be so dazzlingly entertaining one week, can be so utterly nullified once they meet another team at their physical level. And that goes for both sides today, really. It's why France going out was a bad thing not just for France.
Congratulations Boks. Just better.
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: The final
New to the game are you?bruce wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:17 pmCome off it. As I said earlier I didn't even think Kolisis was a penalty. It was a tight game between two good teams that cancelled each other out to some degree.canta_brian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:13 pm Stats will be interesting.
SA have managed to be the most negative team to ever win a World Cup. Not sure that attracts new fans.
Also, Kilosi is a great player, but how his tackle merits a lower sanction that Cane’s is unexplainable.
-
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: The final
Mo’unga had a fantastic game. NZ’s intensity dropped when he and Smith went off. Savea mighty. B Barrett was poor in comparison. The ABs can hold their heads up, that SA steamroller is mighty, as they’ve proved over and over all through the tournament.
I’m baffled by the negativity on here. As a neutral that was fantastically intense. In the rain after all, and 14 v 15. Barnes was very good too.
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: The final
The AB's deserve huge credit for making that so close. SA refusal to go through the hands and exploit the extra man helped them. At the end it was an engrossing final which is all you can ask for really.
I did find the repeated drop goal attempts quite funny. If that was the plan then you'd think that they'd have practiced them a bit more.
I did find the repeated drop goal attempts quite funny. If that was the plan then you'd think that they'd have practiced them a bit more.
-
- Posts: 1972
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: The final
Poor enough final
SA a bit fortunate, etzebeth and ptsd should both have got yellow
NZ had an easy 3 points on 50 mins they should have taken, they ended up asking barrett to kick a very difficult penalty 25 minutes later for the same 3 points
Mckenzie should have come in for beauden he was poor
SA a bit fortunate, etzebeth and ptsd should both have got yellow
NZ had an easy 3 points on 50 mins they should have taken, they ended up asking barrett to kick a very difficult penalty 25 minutes later for the same 3 points
Mckenzie should have come in for beauden he was poor
- Puja
- Posts: 17735
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: The final
Come on mate. All the English and French can empathise with how frustrating it is to just be unable to get that last score to overtake them and then watch as a last lost ball robs your chance and sends them gamboling and celebrating away, acting like they've got even a tenth of a joy that Ben Earl gets from the award of a regulation penalty. It's tough and I appreciate that it's easy to fixate on moments where the game could've turned.canta_brian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 11:01 pmNew to the game are you?bruce wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:17 pmCome off it. As I said earlier I didn't even think Kolisis was a penalty. It was a tight game between two good teams that cancelled each other out to some degree.canta_brian wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 10:13 pm Stats will be interesting.
SA have managed to be the most negative team to ever win a World Cup. Not sure that attracts new fans.
Also, Kilosi is a great player, but how his tackle merits a lower sanction that Cane’s is unexplainable.
But seriously, it wasn't a red. It's not direct contact to the head, cause it's shoulder on shoulder first. Take a break, come back in the morning when it's less emotional, and you'll agree with everyone else.
Puja
Backist Monk