Team for Scotland

Moderator: Puja

Banquo
Posts: 18888
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 9:27 am I wonder if there are statistics showing where on the pitch rucks occur? Mitchell box-kicked often (fact). Was it slow ball from the forwards at the breakdown or safe ball because of the territorial situation that led Mitchell to believe that kicking was the right option?
Not sure how many times this needs to be said. He and they are playing to tight instructions. Simplified - we box kick or kick everything in our own half. And their’s 😂
Banquo
Posts: 18888
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Banquo »

Pretty shocking but an inevitable consequence of the plan is that we kicked 36 times on 42% possession Scotland 25 times on 58%. And didn’t even achieve territorial advantage.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5828
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Stom »

Yeah, the MBM is going to be brutal...

Our default action once we got the ball was to:

a) kick poorly for touch
b) set up a ruck and box kick poorly
c) kick to "compete" and fail to win the ball back.

This is a Scotland side who scored 0 points from entries into our 22. They are not great. But they do punish teams who kick poorly. So why run that risk? Run the ball, ffs. We had 3 flankers on the bench, it's not as if we'd end the match blowing, we'd have the energy left.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6280
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:35 am Pretty shocking but an inevitable consequence of the plan is that we kicked 36 times on 42% possession Scotland 25 times on 58%. And didn’t even achieve territorial advantage.
Wow. Those stats are excruciating. Normally, you'd expect the facts to tone down a grim memory, not exceed it.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14541
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Mellsblue »

Every time you read a stat it gets worse.

Only four times against Scotland did they build an attack of more than four phases.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5828
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Stom »

Does anyone know what phase Scotland’s tries came off? And from what position? Because from my memory they were all second? But can’t remember from what.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11990
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Mikey Brown »

Stom wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:41 am Does anyone know what phase Scotland’s tries came off? And from what position? Because from my memory they were all second? But can’t remember from what.
Not checked but that sounds about right. Scotland are pretty hopeless beyond that point.

You'd really hope those first few phases of defence would be the first ones for El Abd to nail down, but I'm sure it's not that simple.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14541
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Mellsblue »

Mikey Brown wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:44 am
Stom wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:41 am Does anyone know what phase Scotland’s tries came off? And from what position? Because from my memory they were all second? But can’t remember from what.
Not checked but that sounds about right. Scotland are pretty hopeless beyond that point.

You'd really hope those first few phases of defence would be the first ones for El Abd to nail down, but I'm sure it's not that simple.
I’d wager at least a fiver that El Abd didn’t tell Lawrence to show DVDM the outside and then get beaten on the outside to allow the linebreak, for the first try.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5828
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Stom »

Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:53 am
Mikey Brown wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:44 am
Stom wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:41 am Does anyone know what phase Scotland’s tries came off? And from what position? Because from my memory they were all second? But can’t remember from what.
Not checked but that sounds about right. Scotland are pretty hopeless beyond that point.

You'd really hope those first few phases of defence would be the first ones for El Abd to nail down, but I'm sure it's not that simple.
I’d wager at least a fiver that El Abd didn’t tell Lawrence to show DVDM the outside and then get beaten on the outside to allow the linebreak, for the first try.
Lawrence is one of those players who thinks he's amazing at everything, when in reality he's...well...not.

Genge is another.
Banquo
Posts: 18888
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:41 am Does anyone know what phase Scotland’s tries came off? And from what position? Because from my memory they were all second? But can’t remember from what.
One was first phase, t'other was a counter attack from a shit sleightholme clearance/kadab
Danno
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Danno »

Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:19 am It seems there’s nothing to worry about. Borthers has had his say:

“I want the team to play with ball in hand, to attack with it, to be brave, aggressive with the ball, but there is another team trying to stop you and they’re pretty good at it,” he said.

“Ultimately they’re strong in defence, strong at the breakdown, and take the game to this kicking game.“

As long as the other team isn’t strong in defence and at the breakdown - how many can there be - we’ll play some ball in hand.
'Kin hell :(
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:19 am It seems there’s nothing to worry about. Borthers has had his say:

“I want the team to play with ball in hand, to attack with it, to be brave, aggressive with the ball, but there is another team trying to stop you and they’re pretty good at it,” he said.

“Ultimately they’re strong in defence, strong at the breakdown, and take the game to this kicking game.“

As long as the other team isn’t strong in defence and at the breakdown - how many can there be - we’ll play some ball in hand.
Are you sure that wasn't Donald Trump?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14541
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Mellsblue »

Epaminondas Pules wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:52 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:19 am It seems there’s nothing to worry about. Borthers has had his say:

“I want the team to play with ball in hand, to attack with it, to be brave, aggressive with the ball, but there is another team trying to stop you and they’re pretty good at it,” he said.

“Ultimately they’re strong in defence, strong at the breakdown, and take the game to this kicking game.“

As long as the other team isn’t strong in defence and at the breakdown - how many can there be - we’ll play some ball in hand.
Are you sure that wasn't Donald Trump?
Not sure I can handle that performance and Trump in the same thread. Where is my safe space.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 3:34 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:52 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:19 am It seems there’s nothing to worry about. Borthers has had his say:

“I want the team to play with ball in hand, to attack with it, to be brave, aggressive with the ball, but there is another team trying to stop you and they’re pretty good at it,” he said.

“Ultimately they’re strong in defence, strong at the breakdown, and take the game to this kicking game.“

As long as the other team isn’t strong in defence and at the breakdown - how many can there be - we’ll play some ball in hand.
Are you sure that wasn't Donald Trump?
Not sure I can handle that performance and Trump in the same thread. Where is my safe space.
Steve Borthwick has a tremendous approval rating......
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17487
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Puja »

Joking aside, a lot of people can't cope with the state of the world rn and, while "safe space" has been turned to a joke phrase by people mocking it, this board is a politics-free zone. Let's not start a comedy thread involving Trump please.

Mod
Backist Monk
Danno
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Danno »

👍
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17487
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Puja »

Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:53 am
Mikey Brown wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:44 am
Stom wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:41 am Does anyone know what phase Scotland’s tries came off? And from what position? Because from my memory they were all second? But can’t remember from what.
Not checked but that sounds about right. Scotland are pretty hopeless beyond that point.

You'd really hope those first few phases of defence would be the first ones for El Abd to nail down, but I'm sure it's not that simple.
I’d wager at least a fiver that El Abd didn’t tell Lawrence to show DVDM the outside and then get beaten on the outside to allow the linebreak, for the first try.
Have reached the first one on the m-b-m - it was 4th phase and Lawrence was absolutely sold out by Earl blitzing up and failing to catch Russell, despite us being down numbers, leaving a whacking great hole on the inside of Lawrence that he had to prevent DVDM from stepping back into. No choice but to show him the outside and hope he could catch him.

Puja
Backist Monk
p/d
Posts: 3791
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by p/d »

Puja wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:18 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:53 am
Mikey Brown wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:44 am

Not checked but that sounds about right. Scotland are pretty hopeless beyond that point.

You'd really hope those first few phases of defence would be the first ones for El Abd to nail down, but I'm sure it's not that simple.
I’d wager at least a fiver that El Abd didn’t tell Lawrence to show DVDM the outside and then get beaten on the outside to allow the linebreak, for the first try.
Have reached the first one on the m-b-m - it was 4th phase and Lawrence was absolutely sold out by Earl blitzing up and failing to catch Russell, despite us being down numbers, leaving a whacking great hole on the inside of Lawrence that he had to prevent DVDM from stepping back into. No choice but to show him the outside and hope he could catch him.

Puja
Absolutely!!! And did you capture Earl ‘ambling’ back to help out in preventing the try?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17487
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Puja »

p/d wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:44 pm
Puja wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:18 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:53 am

I’d wager at least a fiver that El Abd didn’t tell Lawrence to show DVDM the outside and then get beaten on the outside to allow the linebreak, for the first try.
Have reached the first one on the m-b-m - it was 4th phase and Lawrence was absolutely sold out by Earl blitzing up and failing to catch Russell, despite us being down numbers, leaving a whacking great hole on the inside of Lawrence that he had to prevent DVDM from stepping back into. No choice but to show him the outside and hope he could catch him.

Puja
Absolutely!!! And did you capture Earl ‘ambling’ back to help out in preventing the try?
I'll be honest, I lost interest in watching Earl once he took himself out of the picture, but I do now have a renewed urge to defend Genge and Cowan-Dickie after having watched how hard they ran to try and stop that try. Gave absolutely everything to chase what a lot of front rowers would've given up as a lost cause and very nearly made the difference.

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11990
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Mikey Brown »

Is anyone aside from Squidge actually using the term 'hammer' defence? Is it an England/El-Abd thing? I'm watching the recap for this game and he's said it about 400 times already.

As usual some good points are made, but also some entirely routine scenarios (any kind of linespeed at all) are described as if they've never been seen before.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11990
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Mikey Brown »

There's a nice shoutout for Ted Hill making 75% of a tackle as well.
FKAS
Posts: 8163
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by FKAS »

Mikey Brown wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:12 pm There's a nice shoutout for Ted Hill making 75% of a tackle as well.
4 of 6 wasn't it. So not quite that high.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9041
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Which Tyler »

FKAS wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:53 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:12 pm There's a nice shoutout for Ted Hill making 75% of a tackle as well.
4 of 6 wasn't it. So not quite that high.
Didn't he come on with the clock at 79'52?
p/d
Posts: 3791
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by p/d »

Which Tyler wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 5:06 pm
FKAS wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:53 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:12 pm There's a nice shoutout for Ted Hill making 75% of a tackle as well.
4 of 6 wasn't it. So not quite that high.
Didn't he come on with the clock at 79'52?
Ridiculous timing. That said he put in 4 tackles, each of which prevented Scotland sneaking a late drop goal attempt.

Class
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17487
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Puja »

p/d wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:03 pm
Which Tyler wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 5:06 pm
FKAS wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:53 pm

4 of 6 wasn't it. So not quite that high.
Didn't he come on with the clock at 79'52?
Ridiculous timing. That said he put in 4 tackles, each of which prevented Scotland sneaking a late drop goal attempt.

Class
In fairness, while I was very loud and exercised live about the stupidity of him being brought on for a theoretical 8 seconds, Scotland then kept the ball for 3-4 minutes and having him able to be bouncing around, fresh as a daisy, instead of a knackered Chessum, was useful when they were trying to attack from deep.

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply