Very likely. But if they're not willing to utterly revise acceptance into the police, general training, gun training, guidelines for carrying and discharging a gun, and then review of officer actions by the department, and a society in which the police are expecting to encounter guns and violence then enacting a miserly $1 million per officer insurance that'd come with significant disadvantages in addition to any significant advantages seems like moving the deckchairs on the deck of the Titanic.Which Tyler wrote:Sadly - that seems pretty accurate, and always hasUGagain wrote:In other words the status quo is fine. Let's propose a few tweeks which sound like doing something but in effect do nothing.
It's not like the rich are dying so why worry about it?
I'd also add to any review of the law in the US they could so with seriously reducing the number of political appointments that get certain voters so het up as to what they'll elect, whether it be judges, DAs, Sheriffs, coroners, it doesn't seem remotely healthy or sane. And they need to consider why they're spending so much to incarcerate so many prisoners, vast numbers, on low end drugs charges, many of whom serve longer terms than rapists and murderers.