The 6th Mass Extinction

Post Reply
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

The designer baby boogeyman comes up pretty much every time a technology is developed that can modify genetic material and leave the system viable. Transgenic mice that are used to model disease are a cornerstone of therapeutic development and arose from technology developed that enabled the growth and manipulation of embryonic stems cells. Same fears were aired then, but no designer babies to date. If it were that simple to control the myriad gene-environment interactions that go into generating even the simplest multicellular organism, we would have cracked evolution and the secret of life. It's not simple because simplicity without redundancy would be an evolutionary dead end, like a small rural settlement on the South Island of New Zealand. Variation and disease exist and drive adaptation. Without them we would be nothing.

The only "dangers" of the technology would be it getting into unregulated hands. The CRISPR technology is great, but it has limits in terms of efficacy. It targets specific genetic identity with a reasonable degree of specificity, but there is still a significant chance of off target effects. For a heritable single gene disorder with high penetrance and no foreseeable effective treatment there might be the hope of editing out the defect in eggs or sperm using CRIPR so the mutation is not passed on to the next generation, but anyone that claims they have a magic cocktail of specific gene edits that will lead to increased intelligence or physical attributes is talking out of their arse. The result would be a total train smash.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by rowan »

Not so sure about that. I think the great moral debates of the next few centuries are going to revolve around should we or shouldn't we play God? Should we 'design' our babies or shouldn't we, should we bring ancient species back to life or shouldn't we? Should we control our natural environment or shouldn't we? Aldous Huxley knew this eighty years ago. It's completely inevitable.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

What are you not sure of? That is the current state of biotechnology affairs.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by rowan »

Oh, sorry, according to my Google translator, it appeared like you were suggesting the concept of designer babies was pie in the sky, so to speak...
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

rowan wrote:Oh, sorry, according to my Google translator, it appeared like you were suggesting the concept of designer babies was pie in the sky, so to speak...

A comedian.

It is very much currently pie in the sky territory.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by rowan »


A comedian.

It is very much currently pie in the sky territory.


:roll:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

What the fuck now?
User avatar
cashead
Posts: 3946
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by cashead »

rowan wrote:Not so sure about that. I think the great moral debates of the next few centuries are going to revolve around should we or shouldn't we play God? Should we 'design' our babies or shouldn't we, should we bring ancient species back to life or shouldn't we? Should we control our natural environment or shouldn't we? Aldous Huxley knew this eighty years ago. It's completely inevitable.
1. God doesn't exist.
2. If it means eliminating preventable diseases and is safe and reliable, why not?
3. Yes, especially if the cause of their extinction is "people"
4. Yes, especially if it means revitalising vegetation.

The only debate about it is if you're a boring person who hates things that are good and cool.
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by rowan »

cashead wrote:
rowan wrote:Not so sure about that. I think the great moral debates of the next few centuries are going to revolve around should we or shouldn't we play God? Should we 'design' our babies or shouldn't we, should we bring ancient species back to life or shouldn't we? Should we control our natural environment or shouldn't we? Aldous Huxley knew this eighty years ago. It's completely inevitable.
1. God doesn't exist.
2. If it means eliminating preventable diseases and is safe and reliable, why not?
3. Yes, especially if the cause of their extinction is "people"
4. Yes, especially if it means revitalising vegetation.

The only debate about it is if you're a boring person who hates things that are good and cool.
Pretty much my view of it too 8-)
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
OptimisticJock
Posts: 2275
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by OptimisticJock »

Russia or post antibiotic care. Mainly Russia though I reckon.
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by Digby »

OptimisticJock wrote:Russia or post antibiotic care. Mainly Russia though I reckon.
Tasmanian devil milk may address some bugs we're hearing today
OptimisticJock
Posts: 2275
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by OptimisticJock »

Digby wrote:
OptimisticJock wrote:Russia or post antibiotic care. Mainly Russia though I reckon.
Tasmanian devil milk may address some bugs we're hearing today
I thought "is he ripping the pish?" but I Googled anyway. Interesting.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

The same Tasmanian Devil ravaged by a transmissible parasitic cancer?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by rowan »

Bring back the quetzalcoatlus, I say. Largest creatures ever to fly, they were as tall as giraffes, had a thirty-plus feet wing-span and weighed up to 200kg. They could also fly up to 10,000 miles nonstop. It's doubtful they could carry fully-grown humans, but light-weight jockeys might be able to ride them on short-haul flights.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Vengeful Glutton
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:36 pm
Location: Circle No.3

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by Vengeful Glutton »

Bring back Police Squad

Image

and Mr Ed.

Image

Can gemetetics do that?
Quid est veritas?
Est vir qui adest!
User avatar
Vengeful Glutton
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:36 pm
Location: Circle No.3

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by Vengeful Glutton »

Vengeful Glutton wrote:Bring back Police Squad

Image

and Mr Ed.

Image

Can gemetetics do that?
Last edited by Vengeful Glutton on Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quid est veritas?
Est vir qui adest!
User avatar
Vengeful Glutton
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:36 pm
Location: Circle No.3

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by Vengeful Glutton »

morepork wrote:The designer baby boogeyman comes up pretty much every time a technology is developed that can modify genetic material and leave the system viable. Transgenic mice that are used to model disease are a cornerstone of therapeutic development and arose from technology developed that enabled the growth and manipulation of embryonic stems cells. Same fears were aired then, but no designer babies to date. If it were that simple to control the myriad gene-environment interactions that go into generating even the simplest multicellular organism, we would have cracked evolution and the secret of life. It's not simple because simplicity without redundancy would be an evolutionary dead end, like a small rural settlement on the South Island of New Zealand. Variation and disease exist and drive adaptation. Without them we would be nothing.

The only "dangers" of the technology would be it getting into unregulated hands. The CRISPR technology is great, but it has limits in terms of efficacy. It targets specific genetic identity with a reasonable degree of specificity, but there is still a significant chance of off target effects. For a heritable single gene disorder with high penetrance and no foreseeable effective treatment there might be the hope of editing out the defect in eggs or sperm using CRIPR so the mutation is not passed on to the next generation, but anyone that claims they have a magic cocktail of specific gene edits that will lead to increased intelligence or physical attributes is talking out of their arse. The result would be a total train smash.
Cheers for that. I agree that there is a lot of hysteria surrounding it. Interesting (bit in bold). I guess the point is that disease, for all the suffering it causes, has got us to where we're at. So eradicating it might be a bad thing?
Quid est veritas?
Est vir qui adest!
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by rowan »

Cheers for that. I agree that there is a lot of hysteria surrounding it. Interesting (bit in bold). I guess the point is that disease, for all the suffering it causes, has got us to where we're at. So eradicating it might be a bad thing?

Many diseases were created by adaptation; not the other way around; with measles, tuberculosis, influenza and smallbox the result of animal domestication, great plagues being caused by the squalor of medieval urban societies, scurvy resulting from long voyages at sea duing the age of exploration, and the prevalence of chemicals and radiation in the modern world, along with diet, alcohol, tobacco and general slothfulness being the primary reasons for cancer. Eliminating all these should be top of the agenda.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

Technically most of those are caused by pathogens, not adaptation, and all of them would be history if anti-vaccination dickheads could be isolated on an island. By adaptation, I assume you mean genetic diversity. Innate errors in the reproduction and repair process cause cancer.
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by kk67 »

Vengeful Glutton wrote:
morepork wrote:The designer baby boogeyman comes up pretty much every time a technology is developed that can modify genetic material and leave the system viable. Transgenic mice that are used to model disease are a cornerstone of therapeutic development and arose from technology developed that enabled the growth and manipulation of embryonic stems cells. Same fears were aired then, but no designer babies to date. If it were that simple to control the myriad gene-environment interactions that go into generating even the simplest multicellular organism, we would have cracked evolution and the secret of life. It's not simple because simplicity without redundancy would be an evolutionary dead end, like a small rural settlement on the South Island of New Zealand. Variation and disease exist and drive adaptation. Without them we would be nothing.

The only "dangers" of the technology would be it getting into unregulated hands. The CRISPR technology is great, but it has limits in terms of efficacy. It targets specific genetic identity with a reasonable degree of specificity, but there is still a significant chance of off target effects. For a heritable single gene disorder with high penetrance and no foreseeable effective treatment there might be the hope of editing out the defect in eggs or sperm using CRIPR so the mutation is not passed on to the next generation, but anyone that claims they have a magic cocktail of specific gene edits that will lead to increased intelligence or physical attributes is talking out of their arse. The result would be a total train smash.
Cheers for that. I agree that there is a lot of hysteria surrounding it. Interesting (bit in bold). I guess the point is that disease, for all the suffering it causes, has got us to where we're at. So eradicating it might be a bad thing?
Very interesting.
Playing fast and loose with evolution is never a good thing. Mad cow disease.....how did they think making a vegetarian grazing creature into a carnivorous cannibal was going to be a good idea..?.
WaspInWales
Posts: 4503
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by WaspInWales »

Considering we've only managed to eradicate one infectious disease so far, I don't fancy our chances to eradicate many more that soon anyway.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

WaspInWales wrote:Considering we've only managed to eradicate one infectious disease so far, I don't fancy our chances to eradicate many more that soon anyway.

are you referring to smallpox?

If fucking new age wankers would get on board with vaccination, measles and TB would be history too.
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by kk67 »

I was reading something about oestrogen in the water supply causing something something.......can't remember what it was but it was all the fault of the wimmin.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by morepork »

Maybe women on the pill pishing it into the system?
kk67
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: The 6th Mass Extinction

Post by kk67 »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... nster.html

Dinosaur technology. The Jurassic Park scenario.

We realize it's cheaper to raise her hive army of Nessie's than to renew Trident.
The war deepens when we realize the Ruski's now control hordes of migrating trained, killer Mammoths and the Japs have guerrilla cells of Super Godzilla.
Rapid, French, carnivorous Diplodocus are dominating the close quarter contact,....
Last edited by kk67 on Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:48 pm, edited 9 times in total.
Post Reply