I agree, but it's amazing how many people there are that are that stupid.Digby wrote:Stones of granite wrote:Not really very significant in itself, but it will no doubt ruffle some feathers.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 18706.html
There was a chap interview on Radio 4 a week or so back, so likely Today or PM, and he thought we were already out having voted to leave, so he'll be cross. But other than for people that stupid it's barely news.
Brexit delayed
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Brexit delayed
http://www.thejournal.ie/ukip-wales-mot ... 4-Nov2016/
Yes, well, hard to know where to begin. He's seemingly able to breathe so there must be some brain activity
Yes, well, hard to know where to begin. He's seemingly able to breathe so there must be some brain activity
- Len
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
May to give a speech on Tuesday where she is expected to announce the UK is leaving the single market.............
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10575
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Bit inevitable really. Given the importance that immigration played in the referendum, followed fairly closely by the money paid to the EU, trying to get a solution which didn't control immigration or significantly reduce the amount paid to the EU was likely to flounder. In addition, negotiating anything in two years is crazily optimistic.Len wrote:May to give a speech on Tuesday where she is expected to announce the UK is leaving the single market.............
Now standby for more legal challenges and full scale rebellion in parliament.
- Len
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Sandydragon wrote:Bit inevitable really. Given the importance that immigration played in the referendum, followed fairly closely by the money paid to the EU, trying to get a solution which didn't control immigration or significantly reduce the amount paid to the EU was likely to flounder. In addition, negotiating anything in two years is crazily optimistic.Len wrote:May to give a speech on Tuesday where she is expected to announce the UK is leaving the single market.............
Now standby for more legal challenges and full scale rebellion in parliament.
Fun times ahead. Going to sit back and point and laugh
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Labour has been appalling during this whole process. What an implosion!!! If ever an opposition's voice neaded to be heard.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Don't worry folks, the UK is doing great since Brexit.
Donald says so.
Donald says so.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10575
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Yup. They are a joke and if they are the second largest party after the next general election they will have been lucky.Adder wrote:Labour has been appalling during this whole process. What an implosion!!! If ever an opposition's voice neaded to be heard.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Not easy when 85% of the mainstream media are controlled by right wing oligarchs.Adder wrote:Labour has been appalling during this whole process. What an implosion!!! If ever an opposition's voice neaded to be heard.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
I don't think they imploded just because of the media. Another skidmark left by new Labour.kk67 wrote:Not easy when 85% of the mainstream media are controlled by right wing oligarchs.Adder wrote:Labour has been appalling during this whole process. What an implosion!!! If ever an opposition's voice neaded to be heard.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10575
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Or it could be that they are playing a tune people don't want to listen to. New Labour died years ago, strange that they still get blamed for Labour incompetence.Adder wrote:I don't think they imploded just because of the media. Another skidmark left by new Labour.kk67 wrote:Not easy when 85% of the mainstream media are controlled by right wing oligarchs.Adder wrote:Labour has been appalling during this whole process. What an implosion!!! If ever an opposition's voice neaded to be heard.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Brexit delayed
Meh, Corbyn will get coverage of his speeches just because of his role, the problem is he goes silent for long periods, and when he does speak out has if not an inconsistent message then certainly a scattergun approach. Corbyn also tends to be vague and not have a coherent narrative for how he'd actually govern, and so we get no to trident but yes to building the subs which will be empty of the trident missiles they were designed to carry. In essence he's a bloke who rants in pub, not a leader on the national and international stage, and then of course he's further over to the left than most people are in what's essentially a centre right country and he either lacks the savy to realise appointing IRA staff to his team is a shite idea or he just doesn't care.kk67 wrote:Not easy when 85% of the mainstream media are controlled by right wing oligarchs.Adder wrote:Labour has been appalling during this whole process. What an implosion!!! If ever an opposition's voice neaded to be heard.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Probably... can't say the have shone since.Sandydragon wrote:Or it could be that they are playing a tune people don't want to listen to. New Labour died years ago, strange that they still get blamed for Labour incompetence.Adder wrote:I don't think they imploded just because of the media. Another skidmark left by new Labour.kk67 wrote:
Not easy when 85% of the mainstream media are controlled by right wing oligarchs.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
Better that someone is telling uncomfortable truths than the opposition are just agreeing with rightwing disinformation.
- morepork
- Posts: 7539
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
What the fuck are you on about? What do people want to listen to? You are happy with the slip and slide we are on currently?Sandydragon wrote:Or it could be that they are playing a tune people don't want to listen to. New Labour died years ago, strange that they still get blamed for Labour incompetence.Adder wrote:I don't think they imploded just because of the media. Another skidmark left by new Labour.kk67 wrote:
Not easy when 85% of the mainstream media are controlled by right wing oligarchs.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10575
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
What Im on bout is this failure by Corbyn and his supporters to realise that their message isn't appealing to wide sectors of the electorate. Blaming the media or New Labour is getting a bit tiresome. The Corbyn message and its delivery aren't appealing to voters - its really that simple.morepork wrote:What the fuck are you on about? What do people want to listen to? You are happy with the slip and slide we are on currently?Sandydragon wrote:Or it could be that they are playing a tune people don't want to listen to. New Labour died years ago, strange that they still get blamed for Labour incompetence.Adder wrote: I don't think they imploded just because of the media. Another skidmark left by new Labour.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
As for where we are now, my view is things could be a lot worse, namely as a result of a Corbyn socialist government. The Conservatives need an opposition, but Corbyn is a laughing stock and he is dragging Labour down with him.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10575
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Bit confused - are you suggesting that getting rid of New Labour was a good or bad thing for the Labour party (notwithstanding its ability to win elections of course)?Adder wrote:Probably... can't say the have shone since.Sandydragon wrote:Or it could be that they are playing a tune people don't want to listen to. New Labour died years ago, strange that they still get blamed for Labour incompetence.Adder wrote: I don't think they imploded just because of the media. Another skidmark left by new Labour.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
- morepork
- Posts: 7539
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Sandydragon wrote:What Im on bout is this failure by Corbyn and his supporters to realise that their message isn't appealing to wide sectors of the electorate. Blaming the media or New Labour is getting a bit tiresome. The Corbyn message and its delivery aren't appealing to voters - its really that simple.morepork wrote:What the fuck are you on about? What do people want to listen to? You are happy with the slip and slide we are on currently?Sandydragon wrote: Or it could be that they are playing a tune people don't want to listen to. New Labour died years ago, strange that they still get blamed for Labour incompetence.
As for where we are now, my view is things could be a lot worse, namely as a result of a Corbyn socialist government. The Conservatives need an opposition, but Corbyn is a laughing stock and he is dragging Labour down with him.
Is he really as rabid a socialist as is portrayed by the media? Even in NZ his name is a byword for loony lefties in statements that are dismissive of anything other than this mythical centrist ground. Note that there is very little adult debate about policy. How do you expect to have an effective opposition if the opposition is bludgeoned into this space?
-
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
No, he just isnt very good.
There is certainly an opportunity for a well led centre left party to make real headway at the minute. Alas we have Labour who have committed the grave error of electing a leader who lacks the qualities required of someone in his position. He is so patently out of his depth, comes with such divisive baggage and limited appeal that the party has effectively nobbled itself.
There is certainly an opportunity for a well led centre left party to make real headway at the minute. Alas we have Labour who have committed the grave error of electing a leader who lacks the qualities required of someone in his position. He is so patently out of his depth, comes with such divisive baggage and limited appeal that the party has effectively nobbled itself.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Brexit delayed
You mean he's not good at personality politics..?.fivepointer wrote:No, he just isnt very good.
Well the new world order seem to be very good at personality politics.....so we can all be optimistic now that the businessmen are off the leash.
I've never wanted politicians who are good on the telly. That's Kardashian Politics.
I want people who will police the political sphere. God help me but I want bureaucrats who will police the businessmen, the accountants..... and the political sphere.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Brexit delayed
Then at least you've got May, who's competent in her role as leader and poor on TV. As opposed to Jeremy who's incompetent in his role as leader and poor on TV. I wouldn't mind that so much if I didn't dislike May's policies so much, but it'd be daft to say it's about personality when May has only recently become the PMkk67 wrote:You mean he's not good at personality politics..?.fivepointer wrote:No, he just isnt very good.
Well the new world order seem to be very good at personality politics.....so we can all be optimistic now that the businessmen are off the leash.
I've never wanted politicians who are good on the telly. That's Kardashian Politics.
I want people who will police the political sphere. God help me but I want bureaucrats who will police the businessmen, the accountants..... and the political sphere.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10575
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Its a space that he has happily and actively moved into. By any definition, he is well to the left of any British government since the 1970s.morepork wrote:Sandydragon wrote:What Im on bout is this failure by Corbyn and his supporters to realise that their message isn't appealing to wide sectors of the electorate. Blaming the media or New Labour is getting a bit tiresome. The Corbyn message and its delivery aren't appealing to voters - its really that simple.morepork wrote:
What the fuck are you on about? What do people want to listen to? You are happy with the slip and slide we are on currently?
As for where we are now, my view is things could be a lot worse, namely as a result of a Corbyn socialist government. The Conservatives need an opposition, but Corbyn is a laughing stock and he is dragging Labour down with him.
Is he really as rabid a socialist as is portrayed by the media? Even in NZ his name is a byword for loony lefties in statements that are dismissive of anything other than this mythical centrist ground. Note that there is very little adult debate about policy. How do you expect to have an effective opposition if the opposition is bludgeoned into this space?
With regards to personality, I sympathise with the view that politics should be less about TV appeal and more about competence. But, a leader should be able to communicate effectively. Corbyn contradicts himself within the space of a day and his key subordinates often sing a different tune to his own. How is it an effective opposition that is looking to become a government when they cant even get a clear message out?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Also his key staff are themselves poor performers, which isn't surprising given the sane options in the labour parliamentary party don't want anything to do with him, but it doesn't help put any sort of credible platform forwardSandydragon wrote:Its a space that he has happily and actively moved into. By any definition, he is well to the left of any British government since the 1970s.morepork wrote:Sandydragon wrote:
What Im on bout is this failure by Corbyn and his supporters to realise that their message isn't appealing to wide sectors of the electorate. Blaming the media or New Labour is getting a bit tiresome. The Corbyn message and its delivery aren't appealing to voters - its really that simple.
As for where we are now, my view is things could be a lot worse, namely as a result of a Corbyn socialist government. The Conservatives need an opposition, but Corbyn is a laughing stock and he is dragging Labour down with him.
Is he really as rabid a socialist as is portrayed by the media? Even in NZ his name is a byword for loony lefties in statements that are dismissive of anything other than this mythical centrist ground. Note that there is very little adult debate about policy. How do you expect to have an effective opposition if the opposition is bludgeoned into this space?
With regards to personality, I sympathise with the view that politics should be less about TV appeal and more about competence. But, a leader should be able to communicate effectively. Corbyn contradicts himself within the space of a day and his key subordinates often sing a different tune to his own. How is it an effective opposition that is looking to become a government when they cant even get a clear message out?
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
It's not a question of moving into the space so much as always having been in it.Sandydragon wrote:Its a space that he has happily and actively moved into. By any definition, he is well to the left of any British government since the 1970s.morepork wrote:Sandydragon wrote:
What Im on bout is this failure by Corbyn and his supporters to realise that their message isn't appealing to wide sectors of the electorate. Blaming the media or New Labour is getting a bit tiresome. The Corbyn message and its delivery aren't appealing to voters - its really that simple.
As for where we are now, my view is things could be a lot worse, namely as a result of a Corbyn socialist government. The Conservatives need an opposition, but Corbyn is a laughing stock and he is dragging Labour down with him.
Is he really as rabid a socialist as is portrayed by the media? Even in NZ his name is a byword for loony lefties in statements that are dismissive of anything other than this mythical centrist ground. Note that there is very little adult debate about policy. How do you expect to have an effective opposition if the opposition is bludgeoned into this space?
With regards to personality, I sympathise with the view that politics should be less about TV appeal and more about competence. But, a leader should be able to communicate effectively. Corbyn contradicts himself within the space of a day and his key subordinates often sing a different tune to his own. How is it an effective opposition that is looking to become a government when they cant even get a clear message out?
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14583
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: RE: Re: Brexit delayed
Yep. If anything he's tempered his thoughts on a few issues and moved towards the middle ground, eg the EU and nuclear power, whilst, of course, not fully commiting to the new stance and showing himself to be indecisive.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:It's not a question of moving into the space so much as always having been in it.Sandydragon wrote:Its a space that he has happily and actively moved into. By any definition, he is well to the left of any British government since the 1970s.morepork wrote:
Is he really as rabid a socialist as is portrayed by the media? Even in NZ his name is a byword for loony lefties in statements that are dismissive of anything other than this mythical centrist ground. Note that there is very little adult debate about policy. How do you expect to have an effective opposition if the opposition is bludgeoned into this space?
With regards to personality, I sympathise with the view that politics should be less about TV appeal and more about competence. But, a leader should be able to communicate effectively. Corbyn contradicts himself within the space of a day and his key subordinates often sing a different tune to his own. How is it an effective opposition that is looking to become a government when they cant even get a clear message out?