Lions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Vieo of gatland talking about the back row
is it me or is he describing
CJ Stander
Tuperic
Falateau
is it me or is he describing
CJ Stander
Tuperic
Falateau
-
- Posts: 12224
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
My god he makes this all seem very unexciting.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Lots of rugby to be played, get on tour early and have a big impact and the press will push for it. SOB was very good today so Watson tour unless it's as injury cover.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
Well that's fucked any chance of Russell touring. damned shame. I still think I'd still pick him to tour ahead of Biggar and Farrell but there's no way Gatland will pick him now and there will be barely a murmur in the press when he doesn't.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Lions
I agree it's a shame but for two slightly different reasons. First i think that he's great to watch and as such an instinctive player he'd really suit a scratch team with great players. I also think that it would be the making of him. Right now he's very good but mercurial and am hoping he just becomes consistently excellent.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Well that's fucked any chance of Russell touring. damned shame. I still think I'd still pick him to tour ahead of Biggar and Farrell but there's no way Gatland will pick him now and there will be barely a murmur in the press when he doesn't.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
Enjoyable game today and all the Scots gave it their all - 110% but still came up well short. I think that's us with a single Lion - Hogg.
-
- Posts: 12224
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Strange how it could have been so close for Brown, Nel, Gray, Watson, Russell, Seymour, Hogg and now probably just Hogg.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Lions
It'd be a very impressive unit in many ways. I do though think back to what SA did to NZ in the semi-final and how SA could have quite easily won that game but for the lineout, NZ might well have the best lineout of any top team and taking them on without a real third jumper could see you forced into attack patterns you don't want.whatisthejava wrote:Vieo of gatland talking about the back row
is it me or is he describing
CJ Stander
Tuperic
Falateau
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Its a bit mental that you compare Scotland now to 4 years ago
Since then we have risen from 9th to 5th in the world
Beaten Australia, Argentina, been within a whisker of a RWC semi final
Had a team at the challenge cup final
Won 3 games in the 6N
Beaten everyone bar England in the 6N
and there is a strong possibility we could have 1 scot in the initial 37, in fact i think you could add an extra player to every position and still make a decent argument for taking no scots apart from Hogg,
Just think Hogg takes a knock and we would have zero lions.
edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
Since then we have risen from 9th to 5th in the world
Beaten Australia, Argentina, been within a whisker of a RWC semi final
Had a team at the challenge cup final
Won 3 games in the 6N
Beaten everyone bar England in the 6N
and there is a strong possibility we could have 1 scot in the initial 37, in fact i think you could add an extra player to every position and still make a decent argument for taking no scots apart from Hogg,
Just think Hogg takes a knock and we would have zero lions.
edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Lions
I'm going to be a pedant but when did we beat Aus in the last four years?whatisthejava wrote:Its a bit mental that you compare Scotland now to 4 years ago
Since then we have risen from 9th to 5th in the world
Beaten Australia, Argentina, been within a whisker of a RWC semi final
Had a team at the challenge cup final
Won 3 games in the 6N
Beaten everyone bar England in the 6N
and there is a strong possibility we could have 1 scot in the initial 37, in fact i think you could add an extra player to every position and still make a decent argument for taking no scots apart from Hogg,
Just think Hogg takes a knock and we would have zero lions.
edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
2012... I remember it well.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Apologies, thought that was after the last lions.ARM wrote:I'm going to be a pedant but when did we beat Aus in the last four years?whatisthejava wrote:Its a bit mental that you compare Scotland now to 4 years ago
Since then we have risen from 9th to 5th in the world
Beaten Australia, Argentina, been within a whisker of a RWC semi final
Had a team at the challenge cup final
Won 3 games in the 6N
Beaten everyone bar England in the 6N
and there is a strong possibility we could have 1 scot in the initial 37, in fact i think you could add an extra player to every position and still make a decent argument for taking no scots apart from Hogg,
Just think Hogg takes a knock and we would have zero lions.
edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
5 years in June , thought it was the year after the lions
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Gatland has destroyed welsh backs, his plan is to beat the all blacks by scoring 3. It will fail.Matt Ha wrote:You could also add that the Scottish backs have been the most dangerous and effective over the last two 6Ns but the Lions could end up taking only one of them.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Lions
Two teams have beaten the All Blacks 3-0. Wales in 1905 (only defeat of the Originals, with controversy over Bob Deans' "try") and France in 1954.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:09 pm
Re: Lions
Nepotism or favouritism by any other name....whatisthejava wrote: edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
A current active national coach will favour the players he knows and look for reasons to select them. Gatland (in particular) doesn't like Scottish players, never has and consciously or sub-consciously looks for reasons not to select them.
Put it this way. Our game at Twickenham was bad but will the Wales players who gave up 20 unanswered points at Murrayfield see their chances similarly scuppered?
What does favourites Ireland giving up 3 tries to us in the 1st half then failing to close out from a winning position say about their mental state and ability to play away from home?
Under present circumstances I think we are as well out of Gatland's regime & better off touring with the new coach or getting a summer rest.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:09 pm
Re: Lions
"Dr Tom Smyth's 1910 team to South Africa dark blue jerseys, were introduced with white shorts and the red socks of 1908. The jerseys also had a single lion-rampant crest" (Wikipedia)
Gatland still wouldn't find a Scottish player to fill one.
Gatland still wouldn't find a Scottish player to fill one.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
I'm afraid neither of those things is even vaguely comparable to your humiliation against England.af73 wrote:Nepotism or favouritism by any other name....whatisthejava wrote: edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
A current active national coach will favour the players he knows and look for reasons to select them. Gatland (in particular) doesn't like Scottish players, never has and consciously or sub-consciously looks for reasons not to select them.
Put it this way. Our game at Twickenham was bad but will the Wales players who gave up 20 unanswered points at Murrayfield see their chances similarly scuppered?
What does favourites Ireland giving up 3 tries to us in the 1st half then failing to close out from a winning position say about their mental state and ability to play away from home?
Under present circumstances I think we are as well out of Gatland's regime & better off touring with the new coach or getting a summer rest.
For all some of you seem to think Scotland were a much stronger attacking force than Ireland, you scored the same number of tries with fewer clean breaks and defenders beaten.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
Bang on the money here, Eugene. Both in the aftermath of the game and weeks later I am still absolutely astounded as the denial I see on this board. That was the single worst performance in living memory for me and I was watching many of the Matt Williams era games. They trounced us like a tier 3 nation.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'm afraid neither of those things is even vaguely comparable to your humiliation against England.af73 wrote:Nepotism or favouritism by any other name....whatisthejava wrote: edit
To be clear I think several scots deserve to go but without a sponsor in the lions coaching teams its clear others will be preffered, this isnt nepotism or favortism its just coaches back players they know and scotland getting stuffed inside and outby England will really not have helped them at all.
A current active national coach will favour the players he knows and look for reasons to select them. Gatland (in particular) doesn't like Scottish players, never has and consciously or sub-consciously looks for reasons not to select them.
Put it this way. Our game at Twickenham was bad but will the Wales players who gave up 20 unanswered points at Murrayfield see their chances similarly scuppered?
What does favourites Ireland giving up 3 tries to us in the 1st half then failing to close out from a winning position say about their mental state and ability to play away from home?
Under present circumstances I think we are as well out of Gatland's regime & better off touring with the new coach or getting a summer rest.
For all some of you seem to think Scotland were a much stronger attacking force than Ireland, you scored the same number of tries with fewer clean breaks and defenders beaten.
England were superb but their heads dropped the minute one major call did not go their way. That shows a serious mental fragility that means most of our players are not Lions quality. Watson is the only guy who game out of that game with any credit really and it's no surprise that he's probably our second best shot at a Lions tourist.