Lions

Moderator: OptimisticJock

Post Reply
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Jps wrote:I wouldn't call that a like for like replacement by any means, that's an odd one
It's not. Which means Gatland is going to have to shift the back row around a little bit which makes the Haskell shout a poor one. Perfect for Gatball... but I'd have thought Barclay or Robshaw would be the next cabs off the rank.
He won't have to do any shuffling because he already had an excess of back rowers and particularly people who can play 8. Quite what Haskell is doing there ahead of Barclay orWatson or Van der flier god only knows.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12176
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yup. Haskell would have been at best 5th or 6th on my list to call up, and that's mainly as he may actually suit Gatland's style.

Faletau playing very well since his return and obviously Stander is there anyway but absolutely gutted for Billy. Nobody else can do what he does.
Adder
Posts: 1803
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Adder »

If Haskell can bring his energy from last summer tour in OZ he won't be out of place.
whatisthejava
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Lions

Post by whatisthejava »

Haskell fits the style,
can carry,
can ruck
can run straight into contact

Job done

The only chance the scots of next call ups are hooker and fly half
Big D
Posts: 5600
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Adder wrote:If Haskell can bring his energy from last summer tour in OZ he won't be out of place.
I must admit that was my reaction too.

I don't think there were many Scots in contention to replace him to be fair. Watson would only be considered if one of the 7s go down. Despite how I see Barclay (a 6 or 8 not a 7) I am not sure the international coaches see him as that but rather a second 7 in the Scotland side.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Lions

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

whatisthejava wrote:Haskell fits the style,
can carry,
can ruck
can run straight into contact

Job done

The only chance the scots of next call ups are hooker and fly half
You're way off the mark Java. Russell has been shocking second half of the season - George Ford next cab off the rank. Brown failed at sarries & failed at Twickenham - he is nowhere near the squad. Hartley next.
whatisthejava
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Lions

Post by whatisthejava »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
whatisthejava wrote:Haskell fits the style,
can carry,
can ruck
can run straight into contact

Job done

The only chance the scots of next call ups are hooker and fly half
You're way off the mark Java. Russell has been shocking second half of the season - George Ford next cab off the rank. Brown failed at sarries & failed at Twickenham - he is nowhere near the squad. Hartley next.
I think you have some fair points but my reasoning is the following
RE Russel
Gatland has picked big tacklers over small skilled every time, why would he go for George Ford over Finn Russel, i agree Russel hasnt had a brilliant second half of the season but at the end of the day between him and George Ford one of them will stand in a channel and tackle and the other will get run over, the rest of the squad has been picked to tackle , skill has been removed in favour of tackle grunt

Re Brown v hartley - Gatland doesnt like hartley and Brown fits the mould as much as Hartley, if Owens (only hooker left with a game to play) gets on the plane; Beown has the advantage of being in Oz rather than Argentina, Gatland has used this before, mind u he may well opt for the welsh 3rd choice hooker as he will be in NZ
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Lions

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

whatisthejava wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
whatisthejava wrote:Haskell fits the style,
can carry,
can ruck
can run straight into contact

Job done

The only chance the scots of next call ups are hooker and fly half
You're way off the mark Java. Russell has been shocking second half of the season - George Ford next cab off the rank. Brown failed at sarries & failed at Twickenham - he is nowhere near the squad. Hartley next.
I think you have some fair points but my reasoning is the following
RE Russel
Gatland has picked big tacklers over small skilled every time, why would he go for George Ford over Finn Russel, i agree Russel hasnt had a brilliant second half of the season but at the end of the day between him and George Ford one of them will stand in a channel and tackle and the other will get run over, the rest of the squad has been picked to tackle , skill has been removed in favour of tackle grunt

Re Brown v hartley - Gatland doesnt like hartley and Brown fits the mould as much as Hartley, if Owens (only hooker left with a game to play) gets on the plane; Beown has the advantage of being in Oz rather than Argentina, Gatland has used this before, mind u he may well opt for the welsh 3rd choice hooker as he will be in NZ
George Ford is the starting 10 for the best team in the NH over the last two years. He is the next call up. Either way Ford is a smaller guy but the stats do not suggest he's a bad tackler. I've never seen him run over. He's a big game player, when the pressure is on he performs better than Russell.

Same applies to Hartley. Along with George he's been both the captain and the first choice hooker for the best team in the NH for the last couple of years. Brown, like Russell, has crumbled in the big games.

We're far more likely to have a back row (Watson, Barclay), prop (Fagerson) or lock (Gray, Gray) called up before.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12176
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Mikey Brown »

Wow. You really do hate some of our players don't you? Hartley is just totally average at everything, though manages to still be average when the pressure is on so I guess that is something.

Ford is also pretty erratic in his own way, though incredibly talented. Hard to say whether having the kicking duties taken away from him avoids seeing some of the issues that Russell gets slated for, like missing touch from penalties.

It's worth bearing in mind Farrel is allowed to miss as many tackles or touchfinders as he likes without any criticism.

Not that I actually disagree with your run down of how Gatland will view potential call ups.
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Lions

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

I don't think you know what the word 'hate' means... I think Brown is excellent but the two tests he needed to come through were Eng away & Sarries away. He failed both. Russell is world class one week and awful the next - I don't think anyone would disagree with that.

For the record I think Brown is better than Hartley. I don't think Russell deserves to tour though.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9255
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Lions

Post by Which Tyler »

whatisthejava wrote:Haskell fits the style,
can carry,
can ruck
can run straight into contact with the posts

Job done

The only chance the scots of next call ups are hooker and fly half
FTFY
whatisthejava
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Lions

Post by whatisthejava »

Toonie in the paper hoping for more Lions

I think once the players are in NZ and the welsh lads are so close at hand Gatland will just keep choosing welshies unless its a second row which will be launchbery
Big D
Posts: 5600
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

whatisthejava wrote: unless its a second row which will be launchbery
As it should be.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Lions

Post by kk67 »

Launch and Robshaw could get the call. Probably will.
If Robshaw gets a Lions call the England are in serious trouble in Arg. If they both get the call,......
Big D
Posts: 5600
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Laidlaw, Seymour and Hogg all start on Saturday.
Big D
Posts: 5600
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Like the look of that back 3 alot.Image
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12176
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Mikey Brown »

Shit. Forgot the Lions was actually happening.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Lions

Post by Lizard »

If you don't win this one at a canter, something's horribly wrong (even if your management was daft enough to fly Qantas and add in an extra stop).
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Lions

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Come on you Barbarians!
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Lions

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

Forgot Kyle Sinckler was a lion. Lmao.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12176
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Mikey Brown »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Forgot Kyle Sinckler was a lion. Lmao.
I'm a big Sinkler fan (large parts of that are simply for potential ability and for novelty value) but it does seem a bit crazy to me still. It feels like Fagerson is further down the same path, but suffered from actually staring enough games to show his inexperience, at times, while Sinkler got to play the super-sub role in a largely dominant team.

Either way, I'd be much more worried about Fagerson holding up over the course of the tour v Sinkler with the amount of rugby they've played this season. Sinkler should provide some comedy value too.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Lions

Post by Lizard »

cashead wrote:Yeah, in retrospect, the fact that the 2005 Lions struggled so hard against what was basically a 3rd choice Argentine side and were lucky to get a draw should've sent alarm bells, but the fact that they were far from convincing against the Bay of Plenty and Taranaki in their first two matches pretty much cemented that it was going to be a shit-show of a tour.
This Barbarians side is pretty weak and very young. It's got no regular Super Rugby players, just a couple of national age group and 7s players.

In contrast in 2005, the BOP team against the Lions featured at least 7 past, future or current test players (2 All Blacks, 3 Tongans and a Fijian). Taranaki put out at least 5 (4 All Blacks, 1 Samoan) as well as a handful of national 7s, age group and Maori reps.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
Edinburgh in Exile
Posts: 928
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am

Re: Lions

Post by Edinburgh in Exile »

I see Payne is injured. Shame, he covers a lot of the backline.
Croft_No.5
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Lions

Post by Croft_No.5 »

Luckily so does Daly
Big D
Posts: 5600
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Lions

Post by Big D »

Croft_No.5 wrote:Luckily so does Daly
Aye, Fazlet and Daly cover 10-15 between them fairly comfortably.
Post Reply