Stom wrote:Two things:
1) For Labour to have done this well, after the press they have had and the in-fighting and bickering that has dogged them for ages...it's incredible, really. And they reached voters. Turnout was high, turnout amongst the young was high, and there were some very marginals that could have gone the other way.
No party has the strength to get done what they want, and the only way we could have a government who can pass even half of their plans is with a Tory DUP coalition...which would be a disaster for the Tories and, maybe Eugene could shed some light on this, maybe for the DUP, too, in the long run.
I think there's a good chance we could be continuing our yearly poll cycle. Sigh.
2) The Brexit negotiator from the EU has said that we can take our time, so long as we stick to the 2 years. So that paves the way for Labour to challenge again and again. For the Lib Dems to challenge again and again. For the SNP to challenge again and again. And considering the deep divisions within the Tories, the likelihood of any vote in Parliament actually passing is...slim.
Oh, and btw, does anyone else think we could see the end of Farron? He only just held onto his seat, and he's pretty repulsive. Perhaps Vince will step up as party leader now he's back in power. Highest turnout, we got: 80%, and over half voted for Vince.
Yep, Labour have done well. The two campaigns were polls apart in quality. Corbyn, for the negatives I see in him, is a good and seasoned campaigner. Even more so when playing the underdog.
The next few months will be chaos. If it weren't for Brexit you'd assume there would be another GE in the summer but I just can't see that happening. It's an absolute shambles.
Not sure about Farron. Nice chap, other than his religion driven views on homosexuality, but he's no leader. To be honest, I'm not its that relevant beyond the Lib Dem party themselves.