And stop wearing the hideous pastel pink boots he had on last week.Mellsblue wrote:Ben Nutley will have to play bloody well for Coventry to get a chance with England.
England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Moderator: Puja
- richy678
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:01 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
- richy678
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:01 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Is this the equivalent of Eddie picking Lawes at 6? Or is Kane so likely to be outplayed by Curry and Underhill that you might just as well go for size and power?Lizard wrote:NZ have named same team as last week, but Savea at 7, S Barrett at 6 (“Barvea”, obvs), S Cane to the bench, Todd out with injury, Tuipulotu on the bench.
Interesting. 4 locks. Hmm.
- Puja
- Posts: 17854
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
That is phenomenal news if true.p/d wrote:Farrell back at 12
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Puja wrote:That is phenomenal news if true.p/d wrote:Farrell back at 12
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
Barrett can genuinely play 6, AB's are going to play with 2 2 2 2 across the paddock, you go by their 4 mantras OGL (Over Gain Line), KBA (Keep Ball Alive), TQB (Top Quality Ball), LQB (Lightning Quick Ball). They have a pack full of players capable of strong carries, support and offloading combine that with good clean ball very quickly and oppos are screwed. The props are carrying a lot more than they have in years. Having said that this is gonna be like the ROAR(just for you Morepork) with two big stags going for it on Saturday, maybe this should have been the final...
Last edited by Doorzetbornandbred on Thu Oct 24, 2019 7:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
- morepork
- Posts: 7535
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
The roar Doorz, the roar.
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
its just rutting season over here never heard anyone call it the the Roar but just for you and to make you all misty eyed I'll edit my post.morepork wrote:The roar Doorz, the roar.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6432
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
I disagree. Farrell at 12 harms our chances of winning.Puja wrote:That is phenomenal news if true.p/d wrote:Farrell back at 12
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14580
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Going by the amount of moustaches sported they also have LGBT as their fifth mantra.Doorzetbornandbred wrote:Puja wrote:That is phenomenal news if true.p/d wrote:Farrell back at 12
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
Barrett can genuinely play 6, AB's are going to play with 2 2 2 2 across the paddock, you go by their 4 mantras OGL (Over Gain Line), KBA (Keep Ball Alive), TQB (Top Quality Ball), LQB (Lightning Quick Ball). They have a pack full of players capable of strong carries, support and offloading combine that with good clean ball very quickly and oppos are screwed. The props are carrying a lot more than they have in years. Having said that this is gonna be like the ROAR(just for you Morepork) with two big stags going for it on Saturday, maybe this should have been the final...
- jngf
- Posts: 1598
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Wilson?Puja wrote:That is phenomenal news if true.p/d wrote:Farrell back at 12
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
-
- Posts: 12260
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Wilson hasn’t played. I don’t think it’s tactical but even if it was he now has no gametime at all.
EJ isn’t going to shift on this one, not now anyway. Sorry.
EJ isn’t going to shift on this one, not now anyway. Sorry.
- Puja
- Posts: 17854
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Even if I agreed with that, it's far outweighed by the positive effect of Ford at 10 and Tuilagi being used in his most effective position.Oakboy wrote:I disagree. Farrell at 12 harms our chances of winning.Puja wrote:That is phenomenal news if true.p/d wrote:Farrell back at 12
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Ford back at 10, Farrell to 12.
Slade on bench. Wilson in for Ludlam. No other changes.
Slade on bench. Wilson in for Ludlam. No other changes.
- Stom
- Posts: 5847
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Indeed. Against truly good opposition, we need Ford to pull the strings. Aus were not very good, as shown by our demolition of them.Puja wrote:Even if I agreed with that, it's far outweighed by the positive effect of Ford at 10 and Tuilagi being used in his most effective position.Oakboy wrote:I disagree. Farrell at 12 harms our chances of winning.Puja wrote:
That is phenomenal news if true.
Not sure what to make of NZ picking Barrett at 6. I mentioned on the SHMB that our experiences of locks at 6 are universally horrible and so that's colouring my opinion, but it feels like that's leaving the ruck area very exposed to Curry and Underhill. Although we are going to have to win our lineouts with 2.5 jumpers against their 5 options. What's the opinion?
Puja
Puja
It's going to be one hell of a game. But interesting that NZ have noticed our potential tactics and taken steps to nullify it. I'd change tack. With our flankers, props, and Itoje, we have the ability to cover a lot of ground. And we all know how Eddie has been keeping us uber fit, so let's test their wingers.
-
- Posts: 1323
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Is that an opinion FP or what you've heard?fivepointer wrote:Ford back at 10, Farrell to 12.
Slade on bench. Wilson in for Ludlam. No other changes.
- Puja
- Posts: 17854
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
https://www.englandrugby.com/news/artic ... semi-final
England starting XV
15 Elliot Daly (Saracens, 37 caps)
14 Anthony Watson (Bath Rugby, 40 caps)
13 Manu Tuilagi (Leicester Tigers, 38 caps)
12 Owen Farrell (Saracens, 77 caps) C
11 Jonny May (Leicester Tigers, 50 caps)
10 George Ford (Leicester Tigers, 63 caps)
9 Ben Youngs (Leicester Tigers, 93 caps)
1 Mako Vunipola (Saracens, 56 caps)
2 Jamie George (Saracens, 43 caps)
3 Kyle Sinckler (Harlequins, 29 caps)
4 Maro Itoje (Saracens, 32 caps)
5 Courtney Lawes (Northampton Saints, 79 caps)
6 Tom Curry (Sale Sharks, 17 caps)
7 Sam Underhill (Bath Rugby, 13 caps)
8 Billy Vunipola (Saracens, 49 caps)
Finishers
16 Luke Cowan-Dickie (Exeter Chiefs, 19 caps)
17 Joe Marler (Harlequins, 66 caps)
18 Dan Cole (Leicester Tigers, 93 caps)
19 George Kruis (Saracens, 39 caps)
20 Mark Wilson (Sale Sharks 16 caps)
21 Willi Heinz (Gloucester Rugby, 8 caps)
22 Henry Slade (Exeter Chiefs, 25 caps)
23 Jonathan Joseph (Bath Rugby, 45 caps)
While I would have dropped Daly, I understand why we haven't - it is very late for a change. My only quibble is Slade and Joseph on the bench - it should be one or the other and a winger, preferably Cokanasiga. If May goes down, how do we cover that? Or if we need a change to swing the match, what are we going to do with two outside centres?
Puja
England starting XV
15 Elliot Daly (Saracens, 37 caps)
14 Anthony Watson (Bath Rugby, 40 caps)
13 Manu Tuilagi (Leicester Tigers, 38 caps)
12 Owen Farrell (Saracens, 77 caps) C
11 Jonny May (Leicester Tigers, 50 caps)
10 George Ford (Leicester Tigers, 63 caps)
9 Ben Youngs (Leicester Tigers, 93 caps)
1 Mako Vunipola (Saracens, 56 caps)
2 Jamie George (Saracens, 43 caps)
3 Kyle Sinckler (Harlequins, 29 caps)
4 Maro Itoje (Saracens, 32 caps)
5 Courtney Lawes (Northampton Saints, 79 caps)
6 Tom Curry (Sale Sharks, 17 caps)
7 Sam Underhill (Bath Rugby, 13 caps)
8 Billy Vunipola (Saracens, 49 caps)
Finishers
16 Luke Cowan-Dickie (Exeter Chiefs, 19 caps)
17 Joe Marler (Harlequins, 66 caps)
18 Dan Cole (Leicester Tigers, 93 caps)
19 George Kruis (Saracens, 39 caps)
20 Mark Wilson (Sale Sharks 16 caps)
21 Willi Heinz (Gloucester Rugby, 8 caps)
22 Henry Slade (Exeter Chiefs, 25 caps)
23 Jonathan Joseph (Bath Rugby, 45 caps)
While I would have dropped Daly, I understand why we haven't - it is very late for a change. My only quibble is Slade and Joseph on the bench - it should be one or the other and a winger, preferably Cokanasiga. If May goes down, how do we cover that? Or if we need a change to swing the match, what are we going to do with two outside centres?
Puja
Backist Monk
- Gloskarlos
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
JJ could play wing at a push I’m sure. Worried Daly will be properly shown up, let’s hope this week he’s managed to rectify a few things.
-
- Posts: 1323
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Surprised at Wilson coming back, not sure I would've done it at this stage though. Maybe Eddie thinks his extra experience will be needed instead of Ludlam's puppydog enthusiasm given it's NZ. JJ can cover wing in a emergency but it's not ideal.
- Gloskarlos
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Think I’d rather have JJ’s defence on the wing against the all blacks than Coka’s, Nowell is still injured, think this is the better option really.
-
- Posts: 12260
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Seems to me EJ's plan is Slade to 15 -> Daly to wing or Slade to centre -> Farrell to fly-half, no?Puja wrote:https://www.englandrugby.com/news/artic ... semi-final
England starting XV
15 Elliot Daly (Saracens, 37 caps)
14 Anthony Watson (Bath Rugby, 40 caps)
13 Manu Tuilagi (Leicester Tigers, 38 caps)
12 Owen Farrell (Saracens, 77 caps) C
11 Jonny May (Leicester Tigers, 50 caps)
10 George Ford (Leicester Tigers, 63 caps)
9 Ben Youngs (Leicester Tigers, 93 caps)
1 Mako Vunipola (Saracens, 56 caps)
2 Jamie George (Saracens, 43 caps)
3 Kyle Sinckler (Harlequins, 29 caps)
4 Maro Itoje (Saracens, 32 caps)
5 Courtney Lawes (Northampton Saints, 79 caps)
6 Tom Curry (Sale Sharks, 17 caps)
7 Sam Underhill (Bath Rugby, 13 caps)
8 Billy Vunipola (Saracens, 49 caps)
Finishers
16 Luke Cowan-Dickie (Exeter Chiefs, 19 caps)
17 Joe Marler (Harlequins, 66 caps)
18 Dan Cole (Leicester Tigers, 93 caps)
19 George Kruis (Saracens, 39 caps)
20 Mark Wilson (Sale Sharks 16 caps)
21 Willi Heinz (Gloucester Rugby, 8 caps)
22 Henry Slade (Exeter Chiefs, 25 caps)
23 Jonathan Joseph (Bath Rugby, 45 caps)
While I would have dropped Daly, I understand why we haven't - it is very late for a change. My only quibble is Slade and Joseph on the bench - it should be one or the other and a winger, preferably Cokanasiga. If May goes down, how do we cover that? Or if we need a change to swing the match, what are we going to do with two outside centres?
Puja
Sadly, Joseph just seems to be an emergency cover on the bench because JC/RM are rookies and Nowell is injured.
- Puja
- Posts: 17854
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Fair point, although I'd rather have a bench to scare people than a bench because we're scared.Gloskarlos wrote:Think I’d rather have JJ’s defence on the wing against the all blacks than Coka’s, Nowell is still injured, think this is the better option really.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19371
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Nowell? Injured, gosh.
The most interesting change is the kiwi back row.
The most interesting change is the kiwi back row.
-
- Posts: 12260
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
It's always the ones you least expect.Banquo wrote:Nowell? Injured, gosh.
The most interesting change is the kiwi back row.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6432
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
I hope it does not mean that Billy's form/fitness is in question. Otherwise, Wilson for Ludlam is a significant improvement, IMO.Beasties wrote:Surprised at Wilson coming back, not sure I would've done it at this stage though. Maybe Eddie thinks his extra experience will be needed instead of Ludlam's puppydog enthusiasm given it's NZ. JJ can cover wing in a emergency but it's not ideal.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6432
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
How can the management justify RM's squad place ahead of a 3rd SH or TH? It seemed questionable before the competition started but now it seems very odd indeed. I'd like the thought of Spencer on the bench (if not in the 9 shirt), for example.Mikey Brown wrote:
Sadly, Joseph just seems to be an emergency cover on the bench because JC/RM are rookies and Nowell is injured.
-
- Posts: 12260
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England vs New Zealand - World Ranked #2 vs World Ranked #1
Yup, totally pointless. I don't think he would have gone were Jones not so deeply in love with Nowell and desperate to have an insurance policy if he wasn't fit enough.
The way it turned out Nowell was barely fit and McConnochie was still basically unneeded.
The way it turned out Nowell was barely fit and McConnochie was still basically unneeded.