Page 41 of 294

Re: Trump

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:08 pm
by WaspInWales
Syria.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2017 9:05 pm
by canta_brian
Image

Too far?

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:19 am
by Len
morepork wrote:
Len wrote:
morepork wrote:

Fuck off. I'd rather not have my retirement money raped by some coked-up hedge fund manager on a jolly, thanks. For a recent example, see Peter Thiel in NZ.
So get out now and head to the land of the long white cloud.

I've built a life here. Have a house, partner, career etc. My career would die on the spot in NZ, and the government down there are total fuckwits also.
Adapt to survive bro. Either kick and scream and shout or move away. Europe could be a goer?

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:51 am
by WaspInWales
What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?

If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:27 am
by rowan
WaspInWales wrote:What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?

If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:23 pm
by Digby
canta_brian wrote:Image

Too far?
He does seem to think he can now act as King or Emperor Trump. If he's already blaming the judiciary for upholding the law I wonder how he'll get on with Congress when they will not finance some of his plans, they'll likely be behind his tax cuts, but not his infrastructure plans. Though his infrastructure plans might be just a lie to help get elected.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:54 pm
by morepork
Len wrote:
morepork wrote:
Len wrote:

Adapt to survive bro. Either kick and scream and shout or move away. Europe could be a goer?
I'm not going anywhere.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:58 pm
by Which Tyler
rowan wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?

If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.
I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that way

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:09 pm
by rowan
Which Tyler wrote:
rowan wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?

If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.
I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that way
I see. Well, that wouldn't be anything new, of course. They usually just blame mass killings on 'ISIS' these days, which most Americans broadly cognize as 'Islamic extremism' - without giving any thought at all to which countries might have been involved. So, yes, the odds in that case would be pretty high.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:23 pm
by morepork
rowan wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
rowan wrote:
Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.
I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that way
I see. Well, that wouldn't be anything new, of course. They usually just blame mass killings on 'ISIS' these days, which most Americans broadly cognize as 'Islamic extremism' - without giving any thought at all to which countries might have been involved. So, yes, the odds in that case would be pretty high.

You speak for all of them do you Captain Condescension? They are pretty fukin aware none of the relevant countries are on this childish immigration ban, I can tell you that.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:21 pm
by rowan
morepork wrote:
rowan wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that way
I see. Well, that wouldn't be anything new, of course. They usually just blame mass killings on 'ISIS' these days, which most Americans broadly cognize as 'Islamic extremism' - without giving any thought at all to which countries might have been involved. So, yes, the odds in that case would be pretty high.

You speak for all of them do you Captain Condescension? They are pretty fukin aware none of the relevant countries are on this childish immigration ban, I can tell you that.
Hostility for the sake of hostily because you absolutely cannot stand it when someone does not think as you do. What a child :roll:

& you completely missed the point there, Captain Hypocrite, because I was very clearly referring to ISIS, not the list of banned countries.

Obviously I don't presume to speak for all Americans. That's just the perception I get from the many Americans I know and from their own American news.

So who's being condescending here? :roll:

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:22 pm
by morepork
You tedious cock.


Edit: Invest in a dictionary.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:24 pm
by rowan
morepork wrote:You tedious cock.


Edit: Invest in a dictionary.

& that's not condescending? What a big man you are !! :lol:

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:28 pm
by morepork
Thanks hun.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 4:19 pm
by rowan
Well, 9/11 notwithstanding, terrorist attacks by foreign Muslims on American soil are extremely rare. If there were one, it would be blamed on ISIS, regardless the nationality of the perpetrator. My guess is, the media would pay little attention to their nationality and far more to their religion, which in turn would heavily influence the general perception of the incident among the public. I'm not sure how much Trump and his team would manipulate such an event to pursue an agenda, as he certainly seems more of the bull in a China shop variety of president than the treachorous snake in the grass type that his predecessor surely was.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:21 pm
by morepork
Which is exactly the narrartive that is being had over here by actual people that aren't on You Tube. There is so much redundancy in your tediously repetitive narrative. We get it, the media has fucked the dog for a long time, multiple administrations have pushed military action that has unnecessarily cost lives. Fuck me, we get it. What you are maybe missing is the fact that Team Trumpet has made a point on waging war on the media, but their alternative is being dictated to them by big tech...Facebook, Google, etc. He is thick enough to give them the keys to deep, deep levels of intelligence if it allows him to control the narrative (shit.....maybe you two are related!). This is why the cunt pushes Twatter so aggressively.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 7:36 pm
by morepork
Which is why they should be watch closely. Those fuckers will control all dialogue, everywhere, if we don't watch out.Try coordinating anything if that happens.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:13 pm
by WaspInWales

Re: Trump

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:46 pm
by WaspInWales
If something happens...

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 7:11 am
by Sandydragon
People pouring in. Bad! Surely that's a subliminal message to some of the pond life to have a pop at an immigrant? And blame the judge because el presidente did something unconstitutional! What a clown.

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 8:08 am
by Digby
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 10:44 am
by WaspInWales
Image

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 10:46 am
by Sandydragon
WaspInWales wrote:Image
Please tell that that is a hoax?

Ah, I see by the link that it is in fact fake - although its close enough to reality to be believable.

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 10:51 am
by WaspInWales
Sandydragon wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:Image
Please tell that that is a hoax?

Ah, I see by the link that it is in fact fake - although its close enough to reality to be believable.
It took all my cunning to put that together and just a few seconds to tear it apart!

This fake news lark isn't as easy as it looks :lol:

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 11:17 am
by Sandydragon
WaspInWales wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:Image
Please tell that that is a hoax?

Ah, I see by the link that it is in fact fake - although its close enough to reality to be believable.
It took all my cunning to put that together and just a few seconds to tear it apart!

This fake news lark isn't as easy as it looks :lol:
If it makes you feel any better, I'd rep you if I could.

:mrgreen: Have a big grin instead!!