v Blues
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: v Blues
Well done Blues!
If Gatland could send Seymour and Hogg over to the Scotland camp that would be just great.
If Gatland could send Seymour and Hogg over to the Scotland camp that would be just great.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v Blues
Yup.jngf wrote:Sexton's been totally anonymous since he came on
We had plenty of possession, but couldn't contour up anything that looked like a try scoring opportunity, aside from a driving lineout. Poor, better than the last game, but still poor.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14529
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
Absolutely clueless in the backs. Nowell's lack of pace was utterly exposed. Haskell looked like he has done since he came back from injury - slow and desperately average - but that's no surprise.
All that said, it was a better performance than Saturday. That's a low bar to clear, though.
That last lineout was rank.
All that said, it was a better performance than Saturday. That's a low bar to clear, though.
That last lineout was rank.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
Re: v Blues
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Well done Blues!
If Gatland could send Seymour and Hogg over to the Scotland camp that would be just great.
Can they send Laidlaw too then.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: v Blues
That last penalty and line out summed up both sides rather fittingly.
It's going to be a loooooooooong tour for the Lions.
It's going to be a loooooooooong tour for the Lions.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v Blues
Was Sexton more anonymous than Biggar? Did he do less than Farrell?Sandydragon wrote:Yup.jngf wrote:Sexton's been totally anonymous since he came on
We had plenty of possession, but couldn't contour up anything that looked like a try scoring opportunity, aside from a driving lineout. Poor, better than the last game, but still poor.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
Re: v Blues
MGrath and Marler did themselves no harm again
Owens was good up until his last lineout
Cole and Sinkler again ok but Sinkler needs to curb his entyhusiasm
Itoje and Lawes were a step up from AWJ And Henderson
Haskell was meh, made tackles but nothing special
Tipuric was everywhere again...its a shame Gatland has such a hard on for Warburton as Tipuric really is the better 7
Stander did enough to put pressure on for the 8 spot (But fancy he will play 6)
Webb was better than Laidlaw but not as effervescent as he usually is
Biggar and Sexton both pants.
Henshaw was as expected...Payne was pretty anonymous
Nowelll...a game to forget...advantage North now to take the spot
Daly...got involved and look like he wanted it
Halfpenny..nothing special
Owens was good up until his last lineout
Cole and Sinkler again ok but Sinkler needs to curb his entyhusiasm
Itoje and Lawes were a step up from AWJ And Henderson
Haskell was meh, made tackles but nothing special
Tipuric was everywhere again...its a shame Gatland has such a hard on for Warburton as Tipuric really is the better 7
Stander did enough to put pressure on for the 8 spot (But fancy he will play 6)
Webb was better than Laidlaw but not as effervescent as he usually is
Biggar and Sexton both pants.
Henshaw was as expected...Payne was pretty anonymous
Nowelll...a game to forget...advantage North now to take the spot
Daly...got involved and look like he wanted it
Halfpenny..nothing special
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: v Blues
Better than the last game? Hmmmm. A minor win against a bunch of actual amateurs versus a loss against a bunch of average professionals, tough to call.Sandydragon wrote:Yup.jngf wrote:Sexton's been totally anonymous since he came on
We had plenty of possession, but couldn't contour up anything that looked like a try scoring opportunity, aside from a driving lineout. Poor, better than the last game, but still poor.
Next up is a bunch of proper professionals down south.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: v Blues
Nah, I'll pass. Most Scots don't even want him in the 23 which says all you need to know about Gatland as a selector.MrK wrote:hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Well done Blues!
If Gatland could send Seymour and Hogg over to the Scotland camp that would be just great.
Can they send Laidlaw too then.
- Puja
- Posts: 17466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: v Blues
I only got to watch the first half, where we looked fairly solid. What happened in the second?
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
- cashead
- Posts: 3987
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: v Blues
So, didn't manage to catch any of that, biggest losers? Gatland? Itoje? Nowell? Sexton again? Just guessing by comments on here.
How were Biggar and Haskell?
How were Biggar and Haskell?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14529
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
Three consecutive pieces of magic for West's try.Puja wrote:I only got to watch the first half, where we looked fairly solid. What happened in the second?
Puja
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: v Blues
Only watched the first half and caught the end of the second, but SBW's try must have to be the single most Blues thing I've ever seen. Earned an eminently kickable penalty? Good. Missed relatively simple kick? Bad. Said missed relatively simple kick bounces off the uprights and results in a 1-in-a-million sequence of events that ends with the ball touched down by a man with Orangutan arms surgically grafted on in replace of his regular ones? F*cken ace.
West's try was pretty good too.
West's try was pretty good too.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14529
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
Biggar was average and lasted 35 mins. Haskell was utter, utter gash.Mikey Brown wrote:So, didn't manage to catch any of that, biggest losers? Gatland? Itoje? Nowell? Sexton again? Just guessing by comments on here.
How were Biggar and Haskell?
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
Re: v Blues
Mikey Brown wrote:So, didn't manage to catch any of that, biggest losers? Gatland? Itoje? Nowell? Sexton again? Just guessing by comments on here.
How were Biggar and Haskell?
Itoje played well, just the histrionics that go with him
Nowell, Sexton and Haskell werent great, neither was Biggar but only on for 30 as got injured.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v Blues
Is not magic. There are 2 or 3 of those every Super Rugby match featuring a NZ franchise. That one was just a bit of support running and accurate offloading.Mellsblue wrote:Three consecutive pieces of magic for West's try.Puja wrote:I only got to watch the first half, where we looked fairly solid. What happened in the second?
Puja
The problem is that we scored only 16 points and scored only one try. Why? Because Gats thinks he can bludgeon his way to the line and that mere attrition is enough to win it. Listening now to his post match interview he seems surprised there were a few moments of excellence leading to tries. And now he's saying it won't be that big a step up to the ABs. FFS!
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Spy
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:58 pm
Re: v Blues
As usual, the Blues have no difficulty despatching foreign opposition.
That was a lot of fun. Winning try was a stunner. Was just waiting for the Blues to concede a penalty during that 2 pod time runout, followed by the inevitable kick to corner and maul try. Sure enough we fucked it up, but got lucky with the Lions lineout flub.
Lions dominated set piece, but I think they'll find the remaining nz teams stronger there than the Blues.
Bloody fantastic. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
Sent from my SM-G900FD using Tapatalk
That was a lot of fun. Winning try was a stunner. Was just waiting for the Blues to concede a penalty during that 2 pod time runout, followed by the inevitable kick to corner and maul try. Sure enough we fucked it up, but got lucky with the Lions lineout flub.
Lions dominated set piece, but I think they'll find the remaining nz teams stronger there than the Blues.
Bloody fantastic. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
Sent from my SM-G900FD using Tapatalk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14529
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
I'd agree with most what you say but would dispute the above. He missed a bucket full. Nowell will get blamed for their first try, and he does deserve some, but it all stemmed from Haskell 'rushing' up, getting there late and leaving the outside backs outnumbered.MrK wrote: Haskell......made tackles
- Stom
- Posts: 5819
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: v Blues
I didn't see it all, just bits and pieces, but most of what I saw pointed at a failure in coaching rather than the players. It's embarrassing.
Ruck work was ok-ish, but Webb was appalling, Biggar and Sexton appalling, and the rest of the backs had nothing, therefore, to play with. Typical bloody Gatland.
It's an embarrassment. We're just playing on that bloody "NH can't pass, have terrible handling skills" nonsense, when if you substituted Gatland for Eddie Jones, we'd have won that game comfortably.
Ruck work was ok-ish, but Webb was appalling, Biggar and Sexton appalling, and the rest of the backs had nothing, therefore, to play with. Typical bloody Gatland.
It's an embarrassment. We're just playing on that bloody "NH can't pass, have terrible handling skills" nonsense, when if you substituted Gatland for Eddie Jones, we'd have won that game comfortably.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14529
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
I'll stick to magic. Other than Itoje jumping out out of the line it wasn't errors from the Lions just superb play from the Blues players involved. It was superb decision making, superb offloads, superb timing and superb lines. Magic.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Is not magic. There are 2 or 3 of those every Super Rugby match featuring a NZ franchise. That one was just a bit of support running and accurate offloading.Mellsblue wrote:Three consecutive pieces of magic for West's try.Puja wrote:I only got to watch the first half, where we looked fairly solid. What happened in the second?
Puja
The problem is that we scored only 16 points and scored only one try. Why? Because Gats thinks he can bludgeon his way to the line and that mere attrition is enough to win it. Listening now to his post match interview he seems surprised there were a few moments of excellence leading to tries. And now he's saying it won't be that big a step up to the ABs. FFS!
Yep, the backs are blunt and clueless.
Last edited by Mellsblue on Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: v Blues
Pack - 7.5/10
Backline - 2/10
Has there been one line break from a single Lions back in 2 games? Kicking game mediocre too.
Backline - 2/10
Has there been one line break from a single Lions back in 2 games? Kicking game mediocre too.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14529
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
Fear not, Davies will be at 13 on Saturday......Timbo wrote:Pack - 7.5/10
Backline - 2/10
Has there been one line break from a single Lions back in 2 games? Kicking game mediocre too.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: v Blues
First time you can say that about the Blues all year so make of that what you will.Mellsblue wrote:I'll stick to magic. Other than Itoje jumping out out of the line it wasn't errors from the Lions just superb play from the Blues players involved. It was superb decision making, superb offloads, superb timing and superb lines. Magic.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Is not magic. There are 2 or 3 of those every Super Rugby match featuring a NZ franchise. That one was just a bit of support running and accurate offloading.Mellsblue wrote: Three consecutive pieces of magic for West's try.
The problem is that we scored only 16 points and scored only one try. Why? Because Gats thinks he can bludgeon his way to the line and that mere attrition is enough to win it. Listening now to his post match interview he seems surprised there were a few moments of excellence leading to tries. And now he's saying it won't be that big a step up to the ABs. FFS!
Yep, the backs are blunt and clueless.
If its simply "magic" from NZ's last placed super rugby side then good luck with the rest.