That might be one of the biggest concerns, thats 2 weeks now where a lack of composure has made a difference. We can change players, combinations and everything but if we cant keep composure we'll struggle.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:06 pm That penalty try was a big turning point. We lost our heads they ran in another try.
Team for South Africa
Moderator: Sandydragon
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
-
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
The game really took off for the Boks with that undeserved penalty try. Worryingly Costelow has the HIA protocols to go through. An injury we could do without. Hopefully, Gatland will have learned a lot more but I sense he’s into the four year cycle rather than any optimism for France.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
Totally agree. Last week was worse given the circumstances but we have a real leadership problem there.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:24 pmThat might be one of the biggest concerns, thats 2 weeks now where a lack of composure has made a difference. We can change players, combinations and everything but if we cant keep composure we'll struggle.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:06 pm That penalty try was a big turning point. We lost our heads they ran in another try.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
So other than being physically dominated from 1-15 and the amateurish naivete of or players being brutally exposed, it went pretty well.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
A few of our players have played themselves out of the squad. Some positivity in amongst all that but mostly from a hrs working defensive side.normanski wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:25 pm The game really took off for the Boks with that undeserved penalty try. Worryingly Costelow has the HIA protocols to go through. An injury we could do without. Hopefully, Gatland will have learned a lot more but I sense he’s into the four year cycle rather than any optimism for France.
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Team for South Africa
That's a fair point. I'm not sure that better composure would have done much good today, but it wouldn't have hurt either.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:24 pmThat might be one of the biggest concerns, thats 2 weeks now where a lack of composure has made a difference. We can change players, combinations and everything but if we cant keep composure we'll struggle.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:06 pm That penalty try was a big turning point. We lost our heads they ran in another try.
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
No, I dont think it would have meant Wales winning today, but the composure to circle the wagons after the pen try/ yellow might have kept things tighter.Sourdust wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:28 pmThat's a fair point. I'm not sure that better composure would have done much good today, but it wouldn't have hurt either.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:24 pmThat might be one of the biggest concerns, thats 2 weeks now where a lack of composure has made a difference. We can change players, combinations and everything but if we cant keep composure we'll struggle.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:06 pm That penalty try was a big turning point. We lost our heads they ran in another try.
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Team for South Africa
That depends on how you define "optimism", I guess.normanski wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:25 pm The game really took off for the Boks with that undeserved penalty try. Worryingly Costelow has the HIA protocols to go through. An injury we could do without. Hopefully, Gatland will have learned a lot more but I sense he’s into the four year cycle rather than any optimism for France.
Six months ago, we stood no realistic chance of getting out of our RWC group.
Now it looks like we have a decent shout, and if Gats manages that it will be a solid pass mark in the circumstances.
As to the 4y cycle, I for one couldn't give a toss. I want to win whichever tournament we're currently in.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
Yep. We were at sixes and sevens after that and conceded another really quickly. Then we played catch up rugby which played into a very good bokke defence. To be clear, we would have lost easily today regardless, but I do think we gifted the South Africans a lot by some daft game play.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:33 pmNo, I dont think it would have meant Wales winning today, but the composure to circle the wagons after the pen try/ yellow might have kept things tighter.Sourdust wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:28 pmThat's a fair point. I'm not sure that better composure would have done much good today, but it wouldn't have hurt either.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:24 pm
That might be one of the biggest concerns, thats 2 weeks now where a lack of composure has made a difference. We can change players, combinations and everything but if we cant keep composure we'll struggle.
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Team for South Africa
Similar to last week in some ways.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 7:33 pm
Yep. We were at sixes and sevens after that and conceded another really quickly. Then we played catch up rugby which played into a very good bokke defence. To be clear, we would have lost easily today regardless, but I do think we gifted the South Africans a lot by some daft game play.
The defeat: No problem whatsoever. The manner of the defeat: Cause for concern BUT hugely mitigated by the roster.
I can't decide whether it's a good or bad thing that we haven't shown our hand at all in these warm-ups. Conventional wisdom says you should play your test XXIII at some stage - or at least something close to it. As it is we'll be going in fairly cold against Fiji - but also, they will have no solid idea what to expect!
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
- morepork
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
and monstering the ruck to win turnover ball. Their scrum is also better than decent. I'd be wary of them if I were you.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 9:11 pmFiji's most attacking tactic seems to be an overthrown line out.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
That's not true. It's an easy group, we've always had a realistic chance of getting out of it.Sourdust wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:34 pmThat depends on how you define "optimism", I guess.normanski wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 5:25 pm The game really took off for the Boks with that undeserved penalty try. Worryingly Costelow has the HIA protocols to go through. An injury we could do without. Hopefully, Gatland will have learned a lot more but I sense he’s into the four year cycle rather than any optimism for France.
Six months ago, we stood no realistic chance of getting out of our RWC group.
Now it looks like we have a decent shout, and if Gats manages that it will be a solid pass mark in the circumstances.
As to the 4y cycle, I for one couldn't give a toss. I want to win whichever tournament we're currently in.
Agreed re the 4y cycle. 6N, RWC whatever, I want us to win it. One is not better than the other.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
Player stats:
WALES Tackles Missed Tackles Passes Runs Metres Run Penalties
C EvansFB 3 1 5 4 63 0
T RogersW 5 4 0 1 9 3
M GradyC 2 0 1 2 0 0
J WilliamsC 8 1 6 8 15 0
R DyerW 3 2 1 10 69 1
S CostelowFH 8 2 14 9 24 0
K HardySH 3 1 36 0 0 0
C DomachowskiP 7 1 0 5 3 1
E DeeH 11 0 8 6 1 1
K AssirattiP 5 1 2 0 0 1
B CarterL 5 2 2 3 0 0
W RowlandsL 12 2 6 6 7 1
D LydiateFL 13 3 4 3 3 0
J MorganFL 12 0 7 9 25 1
A WainwrightN8 8 1 1 3 9 0
S ParryR 5 0 0 2 6 0
N SmithR 6 0 2 2 4 1
H ThomasR 4 1 2 4 4 1
T WilliamsR 5 1 0 0 0 0
T BashamR 5 0 2 4 17 1
T WilliamsR 1 2 17 3 16 0
M LlewellynR 1 1 1 2 3 1
L Rees-ZammitR 0 0 1 1 6 0
Lots of tackles missed (but SA also missed 16% of tackles).
Morgan and Dee were the best tacklers - 12 made 0 missed and 11 made 0 missed respectively. Lydiate and Rowlands were busy but missed a few each: 13 and 3, 12 and 2. Rogers was the worst: 5 and 4, Dyer also not great: 3 and 2, although at least Dyer made 69m. Smith and Basham actually did well, considering time on pitch: 6 and 0, 5 and 0.
https://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/matchstats ... gue=289234
WALES Tackles Missed Tackles Passes Runs Metres Run Penalties
C EvansFB 3 1 5 4 63 0
T RogersW 5 4 0 1 9 3
M GradyC 2 0 1 2 0 0
J WilliamsC 8 1 6 8 15 0
R DyerW 3 2 1 10 69 1
S CostelowFH 8 2 14 9 24 0
K HardySH 3 1 36 0 0 0
C DomachowskiP 7 1 0 5 3 1
E DeeH 11 0 8 6 1 1
K AssirattiP 5 1 2 0 0 1
B CarterL 5 2 2 3 0 0
W RowlandsL 12 2 6 6 7 1
D LydiateFL 13 3 4 3 3 0
J MorganFL 12 0 7 9 25 1
A WainwrightN8 8 1 1 3 9 0
S ParryR 5 0 0 2 6 0
N SmithR 6 0 2 2 4 1
H ThomasR 4 1 2 4 4 1
T WilliamsR 5 1 0 0 0 0
T BashamR 5 0 2 4 17 1
T WilliamsR 1 2 17 3 16 0
M LlewellynR 1 1 1 2 3 1
L Rees-ZammitR 0 0 1 1 6 0
Lots of tackles missed (but SA also missed 16% of tackles).
Morgan and Dee were the best tacklers - 12 made 0 missed and 11 made 0 missed respectively. Lydiate and Rowlands were busy but missed a few each: 13 and 3, 12 and 2. Rogers was the worst: 5 and 4, Dyer also not great: 3 and 2, although at least Dyer made 69m. Smith and Basham actually did well, considering time on pitch: 6 and 0, 5 and 0.
https://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/matchstats ... gue=289234
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
Played well: Morgan, Dee (unless the poor scrummaging was his fault), Evans (why did the Ospreys not play this guy?). Costelow, Basham
OK: Rowlands, Lydiate, Wainwright, Smith, Parry, Thomas, T Williams, Llewellyn, LRZ
Poor: starting props, starting centres (one try given away each), Rogers, Hardy
Meh: everyone else
Scrum: just awful
Lineout: really good (if we didn't attack theirs)
Maul: poor
Composure: shite
Defence: shite
Chickens: headless
Yeah, this team was so bad it was hard for anyone, however talented, to look good. Some people have probably played themselves out of a job. Cai Evans has made an audacious bid for the squad. Tompkins now looks like the clear choice for 12 (although of course I will argue that K Williams hasn't had enough of a chance, Osprey that I am).
Oh yeah, and this is a shameful 90s style scoreline. Fucking embarrassing.
OK: Rowlands, Lydiate, Wainwright, Smith, Parry, Thomas, T Williams, Llewellyn, LRZ
Poor: starting props, starting centres (one try given away each), Rogers, Hardy
Meh: everyone else
Scrum: just awful
Lineout: really good (if we didn't attack theirs)
Maul: poor
Composure: shite
Defence: shite
Chickens: headless
Yeah, this team was so bad it was hard for anyone, however talented, to look good. Some people have probably played themselves out of a job. Cai Evans has made an audacious bid for the squad. Tompkins now looks like the clear choice for 12 (although of course I will argue that K Williams hasn't had enough of a chance, Osprey that I am).
Oh yeah, and this is a shameful 90s style scoreline. Fucking embarrassing.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
We’re not just wary of them mate, we’re virtually bricking it at the moment. We can beat them but equally if they get ahead and we start playing sevens then it could be 2007 all over again.morepork wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 11:46 pmand monstering the ruck to win turnover ball. Their scrum is also better than decent. I'd be wary of them if I were you.pompey-zebra wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 9:11 pmFiji's most attacking tactic seems to be an overthrown line out.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
I think after is coming along nicely and I like his positivity. I suspect that his habit of not nailing tackles consistently will mean Adams starting in the big games.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 1:47 am Player stats:
WALES Tackles Missed Tackles Passes Runs Metres Run Penalties
C EvansFB 3 1 5 4 63 0
T RogersW 5 4 0 1 9 3
M GradyC 2 0 1 2 0 0
J WilliamsC 8 1 6 8 15 0
R DyerW 3 2 1 10 69 1
S CostelowFH 8 2 14 9 24 0
K HardySH 3 1 36 0 0 0
C DomachowskiP 7 1 0 5 3 1
E DeeH 11 0 8 6 1 1
K AssirattiP 5 1 2 0 0 1
B CarterL 5 2 2 3 0 0
W RowlandsL 12 2 6 6 7 1
D LydiateFL 13 3 4 3 3 0
J MorganFL 12 0 7 9 25 1
A WainwrightN8 8 1 1 3 9 0
S ParryR 5 0 0 2 6 0
N SmithR 6 0 2 2 4 1
H ThomasR 4 1 2 4 4 1
T WilliamsR 5 1 0 0 0 0
T BashamR 5 0 2 4 17 1
T WilliamsR 1 2 17 3 16 0
M LlewellynR 1 1 1 2 3 1
L Rees-ZammitR 0 0 1 1 6 0
Lots of tackles missed (but SA also missed 16% of tackles).
Morgan and Dee were the best tacklers - 12 made 0 missed and 11 made 0 missed respectively. Lydiate and Rowlands were busy but missed a few each: 13 and 3, 12 and 2. Rogers was the worst: 5 and 4, Dyer also not great: 3 and 2, although at least Dyer made 69m. Smith and Basham actually did well, considering time on pitch: 6 and 0, 5 and 0.
https://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/matchstats ... gue=289234
Although Gatland did namecheck Dyer yesterday.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
Dee has to take some responsibility for the scrum. Marx was putting him under huge pressure.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 2:09 am Played well: Morgan, Dee (unless the poor scrummaging was his fault), Evans (why did the Ospreys not play this guy?). Costelow, Basham
OK: Rowlands, Lydiate, Wainwright, Smith, Parry, Thomas, T Williams, Llewellyn, LRZ
Poor: starting props, starting centres (one try given away each), Rogers, Hardy
Meh: everyone else
Scrum: just awful
Lineout: really good (if we didn't attack theirs)
Maul: poor
Composure: shite
Defence: shite
Chickens: headless
Yeah, this team was so bad it was hard for anyone, however talented, to look good. Some people have probably played themselves out of a job. Cai Evans has made an audacious bid for the squad. Tompkins now looks like the clear choice for 12 (although of course I will argue that K Williams hasn't had enough of a chance, Osprey that I am).
Oh yeah, and this is a shameful 90s style scoreline. Fucking embarrassing.
Evans didn’t look out of place. Nothing flashy but given the circumstances that’s not unexpected. Promising.
This RWC is too soon though.
- Graigwen
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am
Re: Team for South Africa
I missed the whole game yesterday as I was in hospital with my dying brother.
Thanks for the comments posted - is it worth me watching the game now?
.
Thanks for the comments posted - is it worth me watching the game now?
.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
Sounds like you’re having a bad enough weekend. I genuinely wouldn’t bother.
And my best wishes to you and your family at this sad time.
- Graigwen
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am
Re: Team for South Africa
Thanks. I'll do some gardening instead, it is good for the soul.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 11:22 amSounds like you’re having a bad enough weekend. I genuinely wouldn’t bother.
And my best wishes to you and your family at this sad time.
.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
-
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm
Re: Team for South Africa
I hope you and your brother can find peace at this time.Graigwen wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 12:11 pmThanks. I'll do some gardening instead, it is good for the soul.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 11:22 amSounds like you’re having a bad enough weekend. I genuinely wouldn’t bother.
And my best wishes to you and your family at this sad time.
.