RugbyRebels

Mikey Brown wrote:Going into an unlocked toilet cubicle and there's a guy pissing. If you want to stand to piss in a cubicle fine, but why invite all would-be-shitters to interrupt it by not locking the door. Am I missing something?

Coco wrote:

Mikey Brown wrote:Going into an unlocked toilet cubicle and there's a guy pissing. If you want to stand to piss in a cubicle fine, but why invite all would-be-shitters to interrupt it by not locking the door. Am I missing something?

Maybe he had to go so badly that he couldn't lock the door for fear he wouldn't make it then was going to poop after he peed? Maybe he thought he was peeing loud enough to hear or that some guy would look for feet before barging in on his alone time? Maybe he was having a cry? Look for feet ffs or you might get an eyeful of some poor guys frank and beans. Knock first?

Galfon wrote:It is quite probable he was chewing gum or even sucking a boiled sweet at the time.

Galfon wrote:It is quite probable he was chewing gum or even sucking a boiled sweet at the time.

welshsaint wrote: Boiled Sweet.....is that a euphemism?

Mikey Brown wrote:Going into an unlocked toilet cubicle and there's a guy pissing. If you want to stand to piss in a cubicle fine, but why invite all would-be-shitters to interrupt it by not locking the door. Am I missing something?

Mikey Brown wrote:Thankfully not.

To be clear though, this isn't frustration at a one off event. This happens all the time, right? It can't just be me?

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:I tend to agree with you MB. What the feck would a woman know about the correct usage of the dual facilities offered by the gentlemen's lavatory?

Shitters are intended for those who need to shit and should not be hogged by the bladder-shy and small-willyed ponces who can't perform in the public glare of the urinal. That these delta-males then compound their lack of mettle by leaving the door unlocked and inviting the desperate to witness their 'abuse' of the facilities is surely sufficient to warrant a custodial sentence.

Perhaps Debrett's should address this issue in their next edition.

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:I tend to agree with you MB. What the feck would a woman know about the correct usage of the dual facilities offered by the gentlemen's lavatory?

Shitters are intended for those who need to shit and should not be hogged by the bladder-shy and small-willyed ponces who can't perform in the public glare of the urinal. That these delta-males then compd their lack of mettle by leaving the door unlocked and inviting the desperate to witness their 'abuse' of the facilities is surely sufficient to warrant a custodial sentence.

Perhaps Debrett's should address this issue in their next edition.

welshsaint wrote:If I flash my car headlights to let you in, acknowledge it you ignorant feckers. White van man is best, women are clueless.

Galfon wrote:Bogs vary greatly in design, layout and clientele and many factors can come into play, but urinals for #1, cubicles for #2's is a safe starting point.
Sometimes a strategic bush (or wall) is all that's needed.
Are we getting the full story from MB ?

welshsaint wrote:If I flash my car headlights to let you in, acknowledge it you ignorant feckers. White van man is best, women are clueless.

Mikey Brown wrote:

welshsaint wrote:If I flash my car headlights to let you in, acknowledge it you ignorant feckers. White van man is best, women are clueless.

This is a weird one isn't it. A nod or a thumbs up is the difference between this total stranger being a beacon of civilised society or an absolute stain on humanity.

Mikey Brown wrote: Now I think about it, it's particularly prevalent at the rugby or at a gig. Do people think it's an efficient, time-saving manoeuvre? Working towards the greater good of all? I don't know, but if you can be bothered to close the door at all, you can surely lock the thing?

rowan wrote: ... what makes them think I'd be interested in their loser rugby team - let alone consider it my team? It's worse than the FarmVille invites I used to get sent all the time

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

rowan wrote: ... what makes them think I'd be interested in their loser rugby team - let alone consider it my team? It's worse than the FarmVille invites I used to get sent all the time

I think you're on to something there.

It is annoying when you want to enjoy a friendly and informative online experience but some cunt ruins it by flooding the place with shyte on the mistaken assumption that there are other people who give two shits about their pet peeves and opinions.