Sandydragon wrote:
For once I agree with you. People did vote for this clown as opposed to Clinton.
& the pseudo-Democrats deserved her. & they also deserved to lose. Time you got over it.
Meanwhile, as Trump draws all the attention to himself, the empire continues with business as usual..
I am over it. Moaning about Trumps inadequcies doesn't mean that I'm not over the election result FFS.
It seems like you're not appreciating the extent to which Rowan is simply facilitating a grown-up discussion, rather than childishly trying to "win" an argument.
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:14 am
by rowan
Donny osmond wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
rowan wrote:
& the pseudo-Democrats deserved her. & they also deserved to lose. Time you got over it.
Meanwhile, as Trump draws all the attention to himself, the empire continues with business as usual..
I am over it. Moaning about Trumps inadequcies doesn't mean that I'm not over the election result FFS.
It seems like you're not appreciating the extent to which Rowan is simply facilitating a grown-up discussion, rather than childishly trying to "win" an argument.
That's right. There is no argument; we were discussing an old axiom, Donny. & the only one behaving childishly is you, as per usual...
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:26 am
by Donny osmond
rowan wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
I am over it. Moaning about Trumps inadequcies doesn't mean that I'm not over the election result FFS.
It seems like you're not appreciating the extent to which Rowan is simply facilitating a grown-up discussion, rather than childishly trying to "win" an argument.
That's right. There is no argument; we were discussing an old axiom, Donny. & the only one behaving childishly is you, as per usual...
SEE?!
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:42 am
by rowan
Donny osmond wrote:
rowan wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:
It seems like you're not appreciating the extent to which Rowan is simply facilitating a grown-up discussion, rather than childishly trying to "win" an argument.
That's right. There is no argument; we were discussing an old axiom, Donny. & the only one behaving childishly is you, as per usual...
SEE?!
Psychotherapy, Donny. Quick - seek help before it's too late...
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:56 am
by WaspInWales
Lord Lucan wrote:
Lord Lucan wrote:The internet is awash with what is going wrong in Sweden, only the leftest of left wing libtards from libtardsville could deny this. Use google and you'll be snowed under with whats happening in Sweden, and I can assure you it is not the multicultural, islamic utopia the Swedish government are beseeching everyone to believe.
Another great explanation.
Since when did unqualified dickheads with a webcam become the authority on all issues??
And yet you accuse others of falling for things so easily.
I'm sure the internet is awash with any number of claims that support any number of arguments, but it doesn't make them true does it?
No one ever denied that immigration isn't without its problems, but the problems exist anyway. The Islamic migrants you're so terrified of didn't invent murder, rape, assault, theft and any other crime you seem to think didn't exist before people with dark skin moved to another country.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:14 pm
by Len
Lord Lucan wrote:
Lord Lucan wrote:The internet is awash with what is going wrong in Sweden, only the leftest of left wing libtards from libtardsville could deny this. Use google and you'll be snowed under with whats happening in Sweden, and I can assure you it is not the multicultural, islamic utopia the Swedish government are beseeching everyone to believe.
Another great explanation.
He looks like a guy I should listen to.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:43 pm
by Which Tyler
Len wrote:He looks like a guy I should listen to.
He is - anyone who isn't lamestream MUST be worth listening to - you can tell by the way they're not lamestream.
He he he; lamestream; did you see what I did there? lame rhymes with main; and it's funny because I'm 5
Now, though, as we transition into a new and terrifying age, we’re experimenting with an exciting form of macroeconomics: the one man attention economy. To succeed, you only need to grab the attention of one man: Donald Trump.
This isn’t hard, as by most accounts, Trump has the attention span of a toddler. He doesn’t read books. He’s addicted to TV and repeats phrases, word-for-word, that he hears on Fox News. During the presidential debates he preferred not to do prep work, and now, as president, for his intelligence briefings he likes bullet points or “as little as possible.” Trump seems to have no guiding ideology, and this means his opinions — on policy, on people, on pretty much anything — flap back and forth like a flag in the wind. So, if you want to change them, you just have to grab his attention. Even momentarily.
Here are some examples of adaptation to the one man attention economy we’ve seen so far:
PAC VoteVets bought ad space during MSNBC’s Morning Joe (which the President regularly tweets about) in order to “get in front of his face” and put him “on notice.”
John Oliver did the same thing, creating ads for morning TV shows in the Washington area in an attempt to educate Trump about the nuclear triad using a catheter-loving cowboy.
Short-sellers are issuing market reports with lines intended to goad Trump. If he tweets about the companies in question, their stocks will likely fall and the short-sellers will make money.
Others are cutting out the middle man, and using bots that automatically trade stocks based on a sentiment analysis of the president’s tweets.
White House insiders have to play the same game, with the NYT reporting that officials have considered “feeding suggested Twitter posts to the president” in order to steer his policy decisions.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:52 pm
by Lord Lucan
Trump is a genius, his whole aim was to get people talking about Sweden, and that is exactly what is happening, the lamesteam media fell into the trap, little did they know they are now highlighting exactly what he wants them to. More people than ever will now do their own googling on Sweden, and read about the unfolding apocalypse there.
Sweden is spending on average $300 a night to house migrants, when you do the math involving how many migrants there are in Sweden now, the cost is staggering, how long can they keep this up for, where is the money coming from?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:01 pm
by Which Tyler
He he he, lamestream!
Oh, and "liar, liar, pants on fire"
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:53 pm
by Len
Lord Lucan wrote:Trump is a genius, his whole aim was to get people talking about Sweden, and that is exactly what is happening, the lamesteam media fell into the trap, little did they know they are now highlighting exactly what he wants them to. More people than ever will now do their own googling on Sweden, and read about the unfolding apocalypse there.
Sweden is spending on average $300 a night to house migrants, when you do the math involving how many migrants there are in Sweden now, the cost is staggering, how long can they keep this up for, where is the money coming from?
Mate give up.
I went to Sweden 2 weeks ago. Its not apocolyptic.
Which rugby team do you support out of curiousity?
Edit: That video.....
"Its what happens when women vote sentimentally"
Another credible source you've provided us. Lets abolish womens right to vote as obviously they can't be trusted to vote responsibly.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:55 pm
by canta_brian
Lord Lucan wrote:Trump is a genius, his whole aim was to get people talking about Sweden, and that is exactly what is happening, the lamesteam media fell into the trap, little did they know they are now highlighting exactly what he wants them to. More people than ever will now do their own googling on Sweden, and read about the unfolding apocalypse there.
Sweden is spending on average $300 a night to house migrants, when you do the math involving how many migrants there are in Sweden now, the cost is staggering, how long can they keep this up for, where is the money coming from?
Stefan Molyneux seems to have a lovely balanced view of the world.
Why don't you google defoo when you have a moment. The bloke you're sharing with us would appear to be near enough certifiable. While you're at it why not google irony and see what it has to say about an Irish born, Canadian, living in Sweden, who decries immigration.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 4:24 pm
by kk67
WaspInWales wrote:
Since when did unqualified dickheads with a webcam become the authority on all issues??
Where have you been for the last 14 years..?.
I'm not too worried about unqualified dickheads with webcams,....it's the unqualified dickheads with access to Murdoch's worldwide network of media outlets that concern me more.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 4:59 pm
by morepork
Google. That qualifies as reliable source material now does it? Lucan you are a fucking joke mate. Seriously. A complete fucking joke.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:37 pm
by morepork
While he wanks himself off to the attention, all the energy industry people he has surrounded himself with are pushing legislation in his face and handing him a crayon. He has started eating away at the Clean Water Act so mining and oil companies can dump waste directly in waterways. Nice. I mean, who needs clean water?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:51 pm
by Digby
morepork wrote:While he wanks himself off to the attention, all the energy industry people he has surrounded himself with are pushing legislation in his face and handing him a crayon. He has started eating away at the Clean Water Act so mining and oil companies can dump waste directly in waterways. Nice. I mean, who needs clean water?
Luckily in taking healthcare backwards rather than forwards he can avoid paying for some of the damage this will result in
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:31 pm
by morepork
Ha Ha.
Fuck you you intellectually handicapped orange donkey's pizzle.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:46 pm
by kk67
morepork wrote:While he wanks himself off to the attention, all the energy industry people he has surrounded himself with are pushing legislation in his face and handing him a crayon. He has started eating away at the Clean Water Act so mining and oil companies can dump waste directly in waterways. Nice. I mean, who needs clean water?
Rich people don't need clean water.....unless they're in the Maldives
Rich people don't need public healthcare.....their employers pay for it.
Rich people don't need a pay rise,.....they really do not.
Rich people become obsessed with being rich and it makes them go a bit mental.
Rich people can go a bit mental because of their situation,....or because they were already a bit mental or they come from a mental family of insane megalomaniacs. Research suggests that a lot of our world leaders and entrepreneurs can be considered to be clinically psychopathic. Hence the lack of any sense of altruism. Now I think of it we actively encourage these lads in public school and some of them are proper wankers.
and Rich people are constant targets of some very nasty people even though some of them are decent.
After all the times I've written 'rich people'.....include the words ' politician, financial advisor and accountant'.
That's how modern politics is being operated.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:19 pm
by kk67
Sorry.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:53 pm
by jared_7
morepork wrote:While he wanks himself off to the attention, all the energy industry people he has surrounded himself with are pushing legislation in his face and handing him a crayon. He has started eating away at the Clean Water Act so mining and oil companies can dump waste directly in waterways. Nice. I mean, who needs clean water?
They've targeted the Endangered Species Act next. Animals, shmanimals, its not like some stupid bird like the Bald Eagle has any importance or anyth..... oh, wait.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:02 pm
by caldeyrfc
It's nice to see you lot are looking after John the racist, call it care in the community
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:14 pm
by kk67
caldeyrfc wrote:It's nice to see you lot are looking after John the racist, call it care in the community
Now then,....let's be inclusive, you knut.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:42 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
WaspInWales wrote:
Since when did unqualified dickheads with a webcam become the authority on all issues??
'round about the same time as you lot did.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:20 pm
by WaspInWales
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:
Since when did unqualified dickheads with a webcam become the authority on all issues??
'round about the same time as you lot did.
Wow. Burned.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:30 pm
by kk67
I worry that like myself some people might be under the misapprehension that there is a benevolent civil service, a kind of Bond esque patriarchal overlord mastering the UK's necessities.
Meh...