LikeWhich Tyler wrote:FB_IMG_1605995088167.jpg
America
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: America
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
Religion defeats Covid19 with a 5-4 decision by the Supremes. I don't know if they were baiting Biden to add more justices as part of that, but it certainly will not lessen the dram of the Georgia election coming soon.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: America
Digby wrote:Religion defeats Covid19 with a 5-4 decision by the Supremes. I don't know if they were baiting Biden to add more justices as part of that, but it certainly will not lessen the dram of the Georgia election coming soon.
You have to fear for the objectivity of the highest court in the land if it is so easily rolled over by the remedial mewlings of the omniscient space zombie fan club in the face of such hard data.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
morepork wrote:Digby wrote:Religion defeats Covid19 with a 5-4 decision by the Supremes. I don't know if they were baiting Biden to add more justices as part of that, but it certainly will not lessen the dram of the Georgia election coming soon.
You have to fear for the objectivity of the highest court in the land if it is so easily rolled over by the remedial mewlings of the omniscient space zombie fan club in the face of such hard data.
What you could say, yet again is it's a barking mad system. We'd probably have gotten a different 5-4 ruling were RBG still going at it, and it's wrong that a one person swing in a role that's unelected has such an impact. Not that I want to see the judges elected, any elections for judges seems madness to me, but rather the politicians should be driving this process and not the courts. The politicians are awful, but that's a different thing.
Though for my part I'd agree the decision is just flat out wrong, and it'd have worried me had sanity only crept over the line 5-4, this really should be a 9-0 why is this crap even being brought before us ruling.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: America
What did they vote on?Digby wrote:Religion defeats Covid19 with a 5-4 decision by the Supremes. I don't know if they were baiting Biden to add more justices as part of that, but it certainly will not lessen the dram of the Georgia election coming soon.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9286
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: America
WTAF?
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/30/poli ... index.html
An attorney for the Trump campaign on Monday issued a call for violence against Chris Krebs, a former cybersecurity official who was unceremoniously ousted from his post by President Donald Trump after he rejected the President's unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud.
Joe diGenova, an attorney for Trump's campaign, said during an appearance on "The Howie Carr Show": "Anybody who thinks the election went well, like that idiot Krebs who used to be the head of cybersecurity. That guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot."
...
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/30/poli ... index.html
An attorney for the Trump campaign on Monday issued a call for violence against Chris Krebs, a former cybersecurity official who was unceremoniously ousted from his post by President Donald Trump after he rejected the President's unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud.
Joe diGenova, an attorney for Trump's campaign, said during an appearance on "The Howie Carr Show": "Anybody who thinks the election went well, like that idiot Krebs who used to be the head of cybersecurity. That guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot."
...
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
Whether a State, in this case NY, had the right to infringe on 1st amendment right to assemble for religious purposes. And the Supremes decided a global pandemic wasn't sufficient reason to restrict the right to assemble in the worship of sky wizardsSon of Mathonwy wrote:What did they vote on?Digby wrote:Religion defeats Covid19 with a 5-4 decision by the Supremes. I don't know if they were baiting Biden to add more justices as part of that, but it certainly will not lessen the dram of the Georgia election coming soon.
Edit- I now realise my error and should have referred to either the Districct or Distrcoit of NY. (Both these spelling errors appear straight off the bat in recent pleadings submitted by the brilliantly crazy Sidney Powell on behalf of Trump even after being severed by Team Trump)
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 5:24 pm
Re: America
Digby, that was a cheap shot at a former member of the Trump legal team.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
I shall try to be more discroit in future
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: America
Musk now worth $190 Bn. on the back of Tesla.., making him Rich#1.
'"About half my money is intended to help problems on Earth, and half to help establish a self-sustaining city on Mars to ensure continuation of life (of all species) in case Earth gets hit by a meteor like the dinosaurs or WW3 happens and we destroy ourselves,"
..so we can destroy ourselves all over again..masochist, but nice thought sir.
'"About half my money is intended to help problems on Earth, and half to help establish a self-sustaining city on Mars to ensure continuation of life (of all species) in case Earth gets hit by a meteor like the dinosaurs or WW3 happens and we destroy ourselves,"
..so we can destroy ourselves all over again..masochist, but nice thought sir.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
The other half is going up his nose
- Puja
- Posts: 17754
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: America
To be honest, while Musk is a phenomenal toolbag, his ego is probably the only hope humanity has of progressing into space. No government has anywhere near the vision or will to put the necessary money and effort into it.Galfon wrote:Musk now worth $190 Bn. on the back of Tesla.., making him Rich#1.
'"About half my money is intended to help problems on Earth, and half to help establish a self-sustaining city on Mars to ensure continuation of life (of all species) in case Earth gets hit by a meteor like the dinosaurs or WW3 happens and we destroy ourselves,"
..so we can destroy ourselves all over again..masochist, but nice thought sir.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
Puja wrote:To be honest, while Musk is a phenomenal toolbag, his ego is probably the only hope humanity has of progressing into space. No government has anywhere near the vision or will to put the necessary money and effort into it.Galfon wrote:Musk now worth $190 Bn. on the back of Tesla.., making him Rich#1.
'"About half my money is intended to help problems on Earth, and half to help establish a self-sustaining city on Mars to ensure continuation of life (of all species) in case Earth gets hit by a meteor like the dinosaurs or WW3 happens and we destroy ourselves,"
..so we can destroy ourselves all over again..masochist, but nice thought sir.
Puja
I'm pretty sure government spending will be well ahead of Musk's. Which isn't to say Musk and various other private investments will not pay significant dividends when it comes to space exploration.
- Puja
- Posts: 17754
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: America
On setting up a colony outside of Earth? Governments won't even fund owning their own space shuttle anymore!Digby wrote:Puja wrote:To be honest, while Musk is a phenomenal toolbag, his ego is probably the only hope humanity has of progressing into space. No government has anywhere near the vision or will to put the necessary money and effort into it.Galfon wrote:Musk now worth $190 Bn. on the back of Tesla.., making him Rich#1.
'"About half my money is intended to help problems on Earth, and half to help establish a self-sustaining city on Mars to ensure continuation of life (of all species) in case Earth gets hit by a meteor like the dinosaurs or WW3 happens and we destroy ourselves,"
..so we can destroy ourselves all over again..masochist, but nice thought sir.
Puja
I'm pretty sure government spending will be well ahead of Musk's. Which isn't to say Musk and various other private investments will not pay significant dividends when it comes to space exploration.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
Have you noted the spend on the various space agencies per annum? It's not nothing Musk can come in and add to that, but he is adding to that and working alongside even if we allow not all the spend on space agencies (and now space forces) is dedicated to Mars, or space stations as we see with Bezos.Puja wrote:On setting up a colony outside of Earth? Governments won't even fund owning their own space shuttle anymore!Digby wrote:Puja wrote:
To be honest, while Musk is a phenomenal toolbag, his ego is probably the only hope humanity has of progressing into space. No government has anywhere near the vision or will to put the necessary money and effort into it.
Puja
I'm pretty sure government spending will be well ahead of Musk's. Which isn't to say Musk and various other private investments will not pay significant dividends when it comes to space exploration.
Puja
But there's no way even for all their wealth Musk and Bezos can match spending by nation states over time, it's just an entirely different beast. And that before Bezos and Musk would struggle to put all their wealth into such endeavour
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: America
But it's not about money...Digby wrote:Have you noted the spend on the various space agencies per annum? It's not nothing Musk can come in and add to that, but he is adding to that and working alongside even if we allow not all the spend on space agencies (and now space forces) is dedicated to Mars, or space stations as we see with Bezos.Puja wrote:On setting up a colony outside of Earth? Governments won't even fund owning their own space shuttle anymore!Digby wrote:
I'm pretty sure government spending will be well ahead of Musk's. Which isn't to say Musk and various other private investments will not pay significant dividends when it comes to space exploration.
Puja
But there's no way even for all their wealth Musk and Bezos can match spending by nation states over time, it's just an entirely different beast. And that before Bezos and Musk would struggle to put all their wealth into such endeavour
As shown by, for instance, the solar roofs, Musk is extremely focused and able to produce results at a fraction of the cost of his competitors. He tends to cause issues with that focus and drive to get it to market quickly, but there's no doubting he's able to produce cost and time efficient results.
The tech behind those solar roofing panels is so stupidly obvious, though, it just takes someone outside of the existing industry to take a chance and try to turn it into something that can seriously work. Those panels are incredible.
- Puja
- Posts: 17754
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: America
Not to mention that a good chunk of NASA's budget is now going on paying SpaceX to provide services for them.Stom wrote:But it's not about money...Digby wrote:Have you noted the spend on the various space agencies per annum? It's not nothing Musk can come in and add to that, but he is adding to that and working alongside even if we allow not all the spend on space agencies (and now space forces) is dedicated to Mars, or space stations as we see with Bezos.Puja wrote:
On setting up a colony outside of Earth? Governments won't even fund owning their own space shuttle anymore!
Puja
But there's no way even for all their wealth Musk and Bezos can match spending by nation states over time, it's just an entirely different beast. And that before Bezos and Musk would struggle to put all their wealth into such endeavour
As shown by, for instance, the solar roofs, Musk is extremely focused and able to produce results at a fraction of the cost of his competitors. He tends to cause issues with that focus and drive to get it to market quickly, but there's no doubting he's able to produce cost and time efficient results.
The tech behind those solar roofing panels is so stupidly obvious, though, it just takes someone outside of the existing industry to take a chance and try to turn it into something that can seriously work. Those panels are incredible.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
Stom wrote:But it's not about money...Digby wrote:Have you noted the spend on the various space agencies per annum? It's not nothing Musk can come in and add to that, but he is adding to that and working alongside even if we allow not all the spend on space agencies (and now space forces) is dedicated to Mars, or space stations as we see with Bezos.Puja wrote:
On setting up a colony outside of Earth? Governments won't even fund owning their own space shuttle anymore!
Puja
But there's no way even for all their wealth Musk and Bezos can match spending by nation states over time, it's just an entirely different beast. And that before Bezos and Musk would struggle to put all their wealth into such endeavour
As shown by, for instance, the solar roofs, Musk is extremely focused and able to produce results at a fraction of the cost of his competitors. He tends to cause issues with that focus and drive to get it to market quickly, but there's no doubting he's able to produce cost and time efficient results.
The tech behind those solar roofing panels is so stupidly obvious, though, it just takes someone outside of the existing industry to take a chance and try to turn it into something that can seriously work. Those panels are incredible.
We supplied some tech into NASA a few years back, well actually the UK Space Agency but on a combined initiative, it's not my experience these people aren't focused. And none of them came across as being as drugged up as Musk so I'd venture they were actually more focussed. Which isn't to say people looking afresh at a situation can't spot a better way of doing something, but that holds for things Musk is doing as well as Musk looking at others.
And it is somewhat about the money, doing stuff in space is very expensive. Until the pandemic we were doing quite a lot of work with a particular group of mathematicians worked through a combined group out of a well known Uni in the USA and being paid for largely by a well known delivery company and web provider (and others) around quantum computing but a few bits on the side too, and when the topic formally or otherwise went across to some of the work and differences in work for what it was going to take to run ops out of say a space station or even a moon base, well there was something of a gulf between that and Terran operations. At some point I'd like to get back to this as despite it being by far the worst paid work of the week it was if not quite great fun then certainly very interesting, other than having 5-10 mathematicians continually mock my sorry level of mathematics, especially the one who despite thinking he was so good with numbers figured on the back of Brexit that Trump would have the USA additionally invest $250 billion into the UK economy per annum
- Puja
- Posts: 17754
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: America
I think we're using the word focussed in different ways here. In terms of being able to focus on work, you're absolutely right. We're talking about what area their work is focussing on - Musk's space agency has one goal, which is setting up an extra-Earth colony (and earning funds that go towards that goal). He doesn't care about the makeup of comets, researching Jupiter, robotic exploration, etc. So while his budget in total may be lower, his budget specifically for getting humans into space if higher, because it's focussed.Digby wrote:Stom wrote:But it's not about money...Digby wrote:
Have you noted the spend on the various space agencies per annum? It's not nothing Musk can come in and add to that, but he is adding to that and working alongside even if we allow not all the spend on space agencies (and now space forces) is dedicated to Mars, or space stations as we see with Bezos.
But there's no way even for all their wealth Musk and Bezos can match spending by nation states over time, it's just an entirely different beast. And that before Bezos and Musk would struggle to put all their wealth into such endeavour
As shown by, for instance, the solar roofs, Musk is extremely focused and able to produce results at a fraction of the cost of his competitors. He tends to cause issues with that focus and drive to get it to market quickly, but there's no doubting he's able to produce cost and time efficient results.
The tech behind those solar roofing panels is so stupidly obvious, though, it just takes someone outside of the existing industry to take a chance and try to turn it into something that can seriously work. Those panels are incredible.
We supplied some tech into NASA a few years back, well actually the UK Space Agency but on a combined initiative, it's not my experience these people aren't focused. And none of them came across as being as drugged up as Musk so I'd venture they were actually more focussed. Which isn't to say people looking afresh at a situation can't spot a better way of doing something, but that holds for things Musk is doing as well as Musk looking at others.
And it is somewhat about the money, doing stuff in space is very expensive. Until the pandemic we were doing quite a lot of work with a particular group of mathematicians worked through a combined group out of a well known Uni in the USA and being paid for largely by a well known delivery company and web provider (and others) around quantum computing but a few bits on the side too, and when the topic formally or otherwise went across to some of the work and differences in work for what it was going to take to run ops out of say a space station or even a moon base, well there was something of a gulf between that and Terran operations. At some point I'd like to get back to this as despite it being by far the worst paid work of the week it was if not quite great fun then certainly very interesting, other than having 5-10 mathematicians continually mock my sorry level of mathematics, especially the one who despite thinking he was so good with numbers figured on the back of Brexit that Trump would have the USA additionally invest $250 billion into the UK economy per annum
Puja
Backist Monk
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: America
This is the guy that has downplayed the gravity of COVID, rubbished diagnostics despite not knowing what he was talking about, and terminated workers who stayed home when colleagues tested positive?
- Puja
- Posts: 17754
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: America
This conversation did start off with, "I know he's a colossal douchecanoe, but..."morepork wrote:This is the guy that has downplayed the gravity of COVID, rubbished diagnostics despite not knowing what he was talking about, and terminated workers who stayed home when colleagues tested positive?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
But he's still piggybacking a lot of the existing knowledge/resources in his aim, it wouldn't be possible without all that ancillary work having been and being done. And he's still tinkering on the margins in many ways, even if in a very public fashion, and even if it's mostly very welcome from the various space agencies (not sure about the likes of Russia and China in saying that)Puja wrote:I think we're using the word focussed in different ways here. In terms of being able to focus on work, you're absolutely right. We're talking about what area their work is focussing on - Musk's space agency has one goal, which is setting up an extra-Earth colony (and earning funds that go towards that goal). He doesn't care about the makeup of comets, researching Jupiter, robotic exploration, etc. So while his budget in total may be lower, his budget specifically for getting humans into space if higher, because it's focussed.Digby wrote:Stom wrote:
But it's not about money...
As shown by, for instance, the solar roofs, Musk is extremely focused and able to produce results at a fraction of the cost of his competitors. He tends to cause issues with that focus and drive to get it to market quickly, but there's no doubting he's able to produce cost and time efficient results.
The tech behind those solar roofing panels is so stupidly obvious, though, it just takes someone outside of the existing industry to take a chance and try to turn it into something that can seriously work. Those panels are incredible.
We supplied some tech into NASA a few years back, well actually the UK Space Agency but on a combined initiative, it's not my experience these people aren't focused. And none of them came across as being as drugged up as Musk so I'd venture they were actually more focussed. Which isn't to say people looking afresh at a situation can't spot a better way of doing something, but that holds for things Musk is doing as well as Musk looking at others.
And it is somewhat about the money, doing stuff in space is very expensive. Until the pandemic we were doing quite a lot of work with a particular group of mathematicians worked through a combined group out of a well known Uni in the USA and being paid for largely by a well known delivery company and web provider (and others) around quantum computing but a few bits on the side too, and when the topic formally or otherwise went across to some of the work and differences in work for what it was going to take to run ops out of say a space station or even a moon base, well there was something of a gulf between that and Terran operations. At some point I'd like to get back to this as despite it being by far the worst paid work of the week it was if not quite great fun then certainly very interesting, other than having 5-10 mathematicians continually mock my sorry level of mathematics, especially the one who despite thinking he was so good with numbers figured on the back of Brexit that Trump would have the USA additionally invest $250 billion into the UK economy per annum
Puja
And still, whilst I don't know also how much the manned mission to Mars and the possible establishment of colonies is being budgeted for by just NASA I'm confident it'll be more than Musk is going to spend. Understandable when a smallish chunk of their budget would wipe out Musk in just a few years, again assuming Musk even could convert his wealth to cash
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: America
Digby wrote:But he's still piggybacking a lot of the existing knowledge/resources in his aim, it wouldn't be possible without all that ancillary work having been and being done. And he's still tinkering on the margins in many ways, even if in a very public fashion, and even if it's mostly very welcome from the various space agencies (not sure about the likes of Russia and China in saying that)Puja wrote:I think we're using the word focussed in different ways here. In terms of being able to focus on work, you're absolutely right. We're talking about what area their work is focussing on - Musk's space agency has one goal, which is setting up an extra-Earth colony (and earning funds that go towards that goal). He doesn't care about the makeup of comets, researching Jupiter, robotic exploration, etc. So while his budget in total may be lower, his budget specifically for getting humans into space if higher, because it's focussed.Digby wrote:
We supplied some tech into NASA a few years back, well actually the UK Space Agency but on a combined initiative, it's not my experience these people aren't focused. And none of them came across as being as drugged up as Musk so I'd venture they were actually more focussed. Which isn't to say people looking afresh at a situation can't spot a better way of doing something, but that holds for things Musk is doing as well as Musk looking at others.
And it is somewhat about the money, doing stuff in space is very expensive. Until the pandemic we were doing quite a lot of work with a particular group of mathematicians worked through a combined group out of a well known Uni in the USA and being paid for largely by a well known delivery company and web provider (and others) around quantum computing but a few bits on the side too, and when the topic formally or otherwise went across to some of the work and differences in work for what it was going to take to run ops out of say a space station or even a moon base, well there was something of a gulf between that and Terran operations. At some point I'd like to get back to this as despite it being by far the worst paid work of the week it was if not quite great fun then certainly very interesting, other than having 5-10 mathematicians continually mock my sorry level of mathematics, especially the one who despite thinking he was so good with numbers figured on the back of Brexit that Trump would have the USA additionally invest $250 billion into the UK economy per annum
Puja
And still, whilst I don't know also how much the manned mission to Mars and the possible establishment of colonies is being budgeted for by just NASA I'm confident it'll be more than Musk is going to spend. Understandable when a smallish chunk of their budget would wipe out Musk in just a few years, again assuming Musk even could convert his wealth to cash
He is a fucking tourist with accountants.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: America
So like you but with accountants?morepork wrote:Digby wrote:But he's still piggybacking a lot of the existing knowledge/resources in his aim, it wouldn't be possible without all that ancillary work having been and being done. And he's still tinkering on the margins in many ways, even if in a very public fashion, and even if it's mostly very welcome from the various space agencies (not sure about the likes of Russia and China in saying that)Puja wrote:
I think we're using the word focussed in different ways here. In terms of being able to focus on work, you're absolutely right. We're talking about what area their work is focussing on - Musk's space agency has one goal, which is setting up an extra-Earth colony (and earning funds that go towards that goal). He doesn't care about the makeup of comets, researching Jupiter, robotic exploration, etc. So while his budget in total may be lower, his budget specifically for getting humans into space if higher, because it's focussed.
Puja
And still, whilst I don't know also how much the manned mission to Mars and the possible establishment of colonies is being budgeted for by just NASA I'm confident it'll be more than Musk is going to spend. Understandable when a smallish chunk of their budget would wipe out Musk in just a few years, again assuming Musk even could convert his wealth to cash
He is a fucking tourist with accountants.
At least you've got your wish for Twitty to ban the orange one, and bravely with days to go of his Presidency and only year after year of out and out lying mixed with racism and threatening violence
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: America
Digby wrote:So like you but with accountants?morepork wrote:Digby wrote:
But he's still piggybacking a lot of the existing knowledge/resources in his aim, it wouldn't be possible without all that ancillary work having been and being done. And he's still tinkering on the margins in many ways, even if in a very public fashion, and even if it's mostly very welcome from the various space agencies (not sure about the likes of Russia and China in saying that)
And still, whilst I don't know also how much the manned mission to Mars and the possible establishment of colonies is being budgeted for by just NASA I'm confident it'll be more than Musk is going to spend. Understandable when a smallish chunk of their budget would wipe out Musk in just a few years, again assuming Musk even could convert his wealth to cash
He is a fucking tourist with accountants.
At least you've got your wish for Twitty to ban the orange one, and bravely with days to go of his Presidency and only year after year of out and out lying mixed with racism and threatening violence
I'll cut you bitch.