Re: New and Improved EPS Watch/Player Form Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:58 pm
Sorry MB, I thought I was being pretty innocuous 

The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://rugbyrebels.co.uk/
I think that rather too much is made of rare moments of "skill" by commentators and punters. Being a professional rugby player is a full time job. These guys spend every day developing their fitness and skills. Is it all that amazing if a forward drops the ball on to his toe, hacks it ahead and scores a try? This is something I would expect to see from any decent player. But commentators describe it as an incredible bit of skill, and an event right up there with the second coming of Christ. What I can't really believe is the opposite - how lacking in real rugby skills is the current average professional player. Look at the overall standard of passing for just one basic aspect. Head high, knee high, forward, poorly weighted, etc. Good passing should be the norm, not the exception. These players could learn a lot from the Welsh amateurs of the 1970s.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:34 am No Sale v Toulon thread. Just saw Ben Curry’s try. Can’t remember who it was questioning it when I mentioned him having an incredible attacking skillset a while back, but check that one out.
Is his form outstanding enough to give him a nudge into the 23 or has he underwhelmed too much in previous appearances?
The skill levels in the game are infinitely better than they ever have been.Spiffy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:54 amI think that rather too much is made of rare moments of "skill" by commentators and punters. Being a professional rugby player is a full time job. These guys spend every day developing their fitness and skills. Is it all that amazing if a forward drops the ball on to his toe, hacks it ahead and scores a try? This is something I would expect to see from any decent player. But commentators describe it as an incredible bit of skill, and an event right up there with the second coming of Christ. What I can't really believe is the opposite - how lacking in real rugby skills is the current average professional player. Look at the overall standard of passing for just one basic aspect. Head high, knee high, forward, poorly weighted, etc. Good passing should be the norm, not the exception. These players could learn a lot from the Welsh amateurs of the 1970s.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:34 am No Sale v Toulon thread. Just saw Ben Curry’s try. Can’t remember who it was questioning it when I mentioned him having an incredible attacking skillset a while back, but check that one out.
Is his form outstanding enough to give him a nudge into the 23 or has he underwhelmed too much in previous appearances?
I didn’t catch the Christ bit, agreed that’s pretty OTT.Spiffy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:54 amI think that rather too much is made of rare moments of "skill" by commentators and punters. Being a professional rugby player is a full time job. These guys spend every day developing their fitness and skills. Is it all that amazing if a forward drops the ball on to his toe, hacks it ahead and scores a try? This is something I would expect to see from any decent player. But commentators describe it as an incredible bit of skill, and an event right up there with the second coming of Christ. What I can't really believe is the opposite - how lacking in real rugby skills is the current average professional player. Look at the overall standard of passing for just one basic aspect. Head high, knee high, forward, poorly weighted, etc. Good passing should be the norm, not the exception. These players could learn a lot from the Welsh amateurs of the 1970s.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:34 am No Sale v Toulon thread. Just saw Ben Curry’s try. Can’t remember who it was questioning it when I mentioned him having an incredible attacking skillset a while back, but check that one out.
Is his form outstanding enough to give him a nudge into the 23 or has he underwhelmed too much in previous appearances?
Yes. And that is the stock answer. Of course there are some skillful players out there, but a hell of a lot more who are obviously deficient in the basics. It may be to do with emphasis on training in the gym over training with the ball.fivepointer wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 7:16 amThe skill levels in the game are infinitely better than they ever have been.Spiffy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:54 amI think that rather too much is made of rare moments of "skill" by commentators and punters. Being a professional rugby player is a full time job. These guys spend every day developing their fitness and skills. Is it all that amazing if a forward drops the ball on to his toe, hacks it ahead and scores a try? This is something I would expect to see from any decent player. But commentators describe it as an incredible bit of skill, and an event right up there with the second coming of Christ. What I can't really believe is the opposite - how lacking in real rugby skills is the current average professional player. Look at the overall standard of passing for just one basic aspect. Head high, knee high, forward, poorly weighted, etc. Good passing should be the norm, not the exception. These players could learn a lot from the Welsh amateurs of the 1970s.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:34 am No Sale v Toulon thread. Just saw Ben Curry’s try. Can’t remember who it was questioning it when I mentioned him having an incredible attacking skillset a while back, but check that one out.
Is his form outstanding enough to give him a nudge into the 23 or has he underwhelmed too much in previous appearances?
Welsh amateurs werent subjected to anything like the pressure that modern players face.
And I see the ball being moved around with a finesse and accuracy from 1-15 players at times that would have been unthinkable 20-30 years ago. The skills in forwards have risen dramatically. The ability to play long passes and offload out of tackles has developed enormously.Spiffy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:30 pmYes. And that is the stock answer. Of course there are some skillful players out there, but a hell of a lot more who are obviously deficient in the basics. It may be to do with emphasis on training in the gym over training with the ball.fivepointer wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 7:16 amThe skill levels in the game are infinitely better than they ever have been.Spiffy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:54 am I think that rather too much is made of rare moments of "skill" by commentators and punters. Being a professional rugby player is a full time job. These guys spend every day developing their fitness and skills. Is it all that amazing if a forward drops the ball on to his toe, hacks it ahead and scores a try? This is something I would expect to see from any decent player. But commentators describe it as an incredible bit of skill, and an event right up there with the second coming of Christ. What I can't really believe is the opposite - how lacking in real rugby skills is the current average professional player. Look at the overall standard of passing for just one basic aspect. Head high, knee high, forward, poorly weighted, etc. Good passing should be the norm, not the exception. These players could learn a lot from the Welsh amateurs of the 1970s.
Welsh amateurs werent subjected to anything like the pressure that modern players face.
Only reporting what I see - a large number of misdirected passes, forward passes, poorly-timed passes, no-look passes, passes directly into touch etc.. At the top level, a good pass should be the norm, and not the subject of gushing praise as something special. I am tired of hearing commentators go on about amazing skills when usually they are not amazing at all, just the nuts and bolts of decent rugby.. (They may look amazing compared with all the sloppy stuff that goes on.)
In addition, I'm not sure I buy the premise that skills in the 80s look better. Yes, everything was slower and less pressurised, but even with that the skills don't look better to me. Fair enough if you watch clips of flowing moves, but if you watch a full game there are so many drops and bad passes. Some games had 50 scrums.
Rugby involves mistakes. Back then they occurred more frequently. Now, the laws are adjusted to produce them and tactics include kick-fests to wait for them.Cameo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 4:23 amIn addition, I'm not sure I buy the premise that skills in the 80s look better. Yes, everything was slower and less pressurised, but even with that the skills don't look better to me. Fair enough if you watch clips of flowing moves, but if you watch a full game there are so many drops and bad passes. Some games had 50 scrums.
Danno wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:50 pm Felix Jones has been officially released from his contract. Something went really stinky there.
https://www.rte.ie/sport/rugby/2024/121 ... um=bluesky
There was also a defence of the continuing turnover of England coaches, which has continued from the Jones era into Borthwick’s tenure with the departures of Aled Walters and Felix Jones.
Walters, the conditioning expert who joined Ireland in the summer following England’s 2-0 series loss to New Zealand, is set for a role on the British and Irish Lions tour of Australia.
Jones, meanwhile, resigned as defence coach, leading to the appointment of Joe El-Abd on a job-share agreement with Oyonnax in the French second division.
“I don’t think it was shambolic,” Sweeney said. “I can give you very good reasons why. You can’t legislate someone’s personal freedom, personal choice in terms of what they want to do. Did we think Aled Walters was going to go? No. Did we think Felix Jones was going to go? No.
“We thought they were going to stay longer. You know the relationship between Aled and Felix have – it goes back to Munster, South Africa, it comes to here. You know the family situations of them. Aled took a personal decision to go to Ireland when Jason Cowman [Walters’ predecessor at the IRFU] resigned. The speculation is that Felix was influenced by that, and chose to leave.
what was the story there btw?Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:40 am Sweeney just casually ignoring the Tom Tombleson sized elephant in the room.
Tom was hugely popular with the squad and also with Aled. Sweaty Ballsack binned him off which really pissed Aled off and undermined him and he was gone a week later. The backdrop to that is treatment of staff in general.Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:19 pmwhat was the story there btw?Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:40 am Sweeney just casually ignoring the Tom Tombleson sized elephant in the room.
that's on Stonking Ballsup then I guess. Mind, being popular with the squad isn't necessarily the same as being any good.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:23 pmTom was hugely popular with the squad and also with Aled. Sweaty Ballsack binned him off which really pissed Aled off and undermined him and he was gone a week later. The backdrop to that is treatment of staff in general.Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:19 pmwhat was the story there btw?Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:40 am Sweeney just casually ignoring the Tom Tombleson sized elephant in the room.
Even if he wasn't great (haven't read anything to suggest he wasn't, to be clear) if the payoff for him leaving was effectively the loss of Walters and Jones, it probably wasn't worth it.Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:35 pmthat's on Stonking Ballsup then I guess. Mind, being popular with the squad isn't necessarily the same as being any good.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:23 pmTom was hugely popular with the squad and also with Aled. Sweaty Ballsack binned him off which really pissed Aled off and undermined him and he was gone a week later. The backdrop to that is treatment of staff in general.
Walters was offered a job with Ireland before Tombleson left. His wife is Irish and Walters spent time living there previously. It was a chance to get back closer to family as well as being offered a wedge and unfiltered access to the players by Ireland.Tom Moore wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 3:51 pmEven if he wasn't great (haven't read anything to suggest he wasn't, to be clear) if the payoff for him leaving was effectively the loss of Walters and Jones, it probably wasn't worth it.Banquo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:35 pmthat's on Stonking Ballsup then I guess. Mind, being popular with the squad isn't necessarily the same as being any good.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:23 pm
Tom was hugely popular with the squad and also with Aled. Sweaty Ballsack binned him off which really pissed Aled off and undermined him and he was gone a week later. The backdrop to that is treatment of staff in general.
This outcome strikes me as a huge cock-up. He has now wasted months only to have the op' with recovery that much later than it would have been if it had been done straight away. The implication is that either the player had his say but rehab failed or Borthwick has caused delay. Baxter originally implied that Borthwick was dithering and had delayed either route - op' or physio.
I am impressed at how swiftly this has become "probably Borthwick's fault" to you.Oakboy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:26 amThis outcome strikes me as a huge cock-up. He has now wasted months only to have the op' with recovery that much later than it would have been if it had been done straight away. The implication is that either the player had his say but rehab failed or Borthwick has caused delay. Baxter originally implied that Borthwick was dithering and had delayed either route - op' or physio.