To paraphrase someone after Western Samoa beat Wales:Mr Mwenda wrote:North out.
Thank goodness for that. It’s going to be difficult enough to beat South Africa, imagine if we had to play the whole continent.
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
To paraphrase someone after Western Samoa beat Wales:Mr Mwenda wrote:North out.
{Golfclap}Mellsblue wrote:To paraphrase someone after Western Samoa beat Wales:Mr Mwenda wrote:North out.
Thank goodness for that. It’s going to be difficult enough to beat South Africa, imagine if we had to play the whole continent.
Excellent. Not for poor North, mind.Mellsblue wrote:To paraphrase someone after Western Samoa beat Wales:Mr Mwenda wrote:North out.
Thank goodness for that. It’s going to be difficult enough to beat South Africa, imagine if we had to play the whole continent.
whatisthejava wrote:Not convinced by that, Gatland isnt a autocrat, and everyone knows while the wales players are good but their systems were not good and were flattered by the first 3 results and then shat it when they were a sniff away from a grand slam.Stom wrote: This is going to be a very Wales heavy squad.
I do think England will get very few player, but you got beaten by everyone else, and dont have a voice in the room so when the 50s/50s come up they will go against you.
My gut feel is The forwards will be a mix of Wales/Scotland/IReland and Itoje
The backs will be a mix of welsh and scots with Henshaw
I think its really difficult to name a single english player that outdid his rival even while losing , even though Itoje was a nuisance , he was a nuisance because he was constatly playing illegally and getting penalised.
The props got done up front by Ireland and Scotland
The back row got done in by all 3
The wings never saw the ball
Daly was attrocious
The centres either got ignored or smashed
- Again like Wales, the english players arent suddenly bad but they look like they have been flogged and need some serious downtime. THey wernt from a RWC final, to a few weeks off to a pandemic to a 11 month season , to eddies kamikazee training camps to historic loss to scotland ,ending with a record defeat to Wales and a pasting by Ireland.
Not exactly mentally ready for a lions tour.
- ON the lions, i think its a bad omen, if you want to beat the saffers you need the english players and their arrogance to turn up, we dont have that this year and i think Rassie will have only pick a game plan once the squad has been announed, if we go mobile he will smash us up front. If we go heavy, he will pick a mobile team and smash us out wide.
It is an interesting one really. Form is one thing but if a player has been trending up for a while and continued to improve, or the opposite of that then it shouldn't be misconstrued as form.Digby wrote:You'd think 20 odd names would be pretty much inked in no matter the 6N. The form discussion is likely only to arise around the last 10-15 spots going
if it gets less English players on tour I'm all for selecting on form. just I'd guess the likes of Furlong, Farrell and so on would be going whatever had happened in the 6N, whereas some of the 3rd, 4th choices in a position might come down to who impressed in the 6NBig D wrote:It is an interesting one really. Form is one thing but if a player has been trending up for a while and continued to improve, or the opposite of that then it shouldn't be misconstrued as form.Digby wrote:You'd think 20 odd names would be pretty much inked in no matter the 6N. The form discussion is likely only to arise around the last 10-15 spots going
I am not saying that from a place of trying to squeeze more Scots in, for me they'd still be the smallest contingent of the party.
As I say, it is the discerning who has simply lost form and could go (maybe May and George could be a examples) v a player who has been slowly reducing from his peak and perhaps not right for SA such as a Mako (and Billy for me) for example who may have been thought as certs 18 months ago. Only using English players as examples as I think they are the hardest to split form v a downward/upward trend.Digby wrote:if it gets less English players on tour I'm all for selecting on form. just I'd guess the likes of Furlong, Farrell and so on would be going whatever had happened in the 6N, whereas some of the 3rd, 4th choices in a position might come down to who impressed in the 6NBig D wrote:It is an interesting one really. Form is one thing but if a player has been trending up for a while and continued to improve, or the opposite of that then it shouldn't be misconstrued as form.Digby wrote:You'd think 20 odd names would be pretty much inked in no matter the 6N. The form discussion is likely only to arise around the last 10-15 spots going
I am not saying that from a place of trying to squeeze more Scots in, for me they'd still be the smallest contingent of the party.
It’s a paper tissue cover regarding no.8whatisthejava wrote:I did my lions 36 today, well 33 (really dont know about 3) and Tipuric never made it, i was sure he would be there but I really dont think Gatland will not take Watson and Curry covers all 3 back row spotsDan. Dan. Dan. wrote: As much as I love Tipuric as a player, I think SA will just munch him, and there's no chance Gatland plays the gameplan that would suit him...
Take it you’re in agreement then PujaPuja wrote:The last two posts on this thread are utterly unsurprising.
Puja
Yes. But Simmonds has been playing only 8 at club level for some time and is a bit of an unknown quantity at 6 or 7.jngf wrote:It’s a paper tissue cover regarding no.8whatisthejava wrote:I did my lions 36 today, well 33 (really dont know about 3) and Tipuric never made it, i was sure he would be there but I really dont think Gatland will not take Watson and Curry covers all 3 back row spotsDan. Dan. Dan. wrote: As much as I love Tipuric as a player, I think SA will just munch him, and there's no chance Gatland plays the gameplan that would suit him...
Imo Tom Curry’s definitely a grafter and has a lot of doggedness/tenacity but whether England or the Lions I’d pick Sam Simmonds over him whether we’re talking 6, 7 or 8 every time. Simmonds has an X factor of pace and dynamic power which Curry (even in bulked up version) simply doesn’t
Good old Underwood.whatisthejava wrote:Mental , the back row is so competitive a lions back row of Richie, Underwood and navidi might not even tour.
That’s two lions tours he could have went on and picked family twice. Speaks volumes of the man.Mellsblue wrote:Ben Youngs withdraws from selection.
He has lost a step. Still not sure I'd play him in the back row though...Banquo wrote:Good old Underwood.whatisthejava wrote:Mental , the back row is so competitive a lions back row of Richie, Underwood and navidi might not even tour.
It does. I'd have taken him but he clearly (and correctly imo) values family above all else.whatisthejava wrote:That’s two lions tours he could have went on and picked family twice. Speaks volumes of the man.Mellsblue wrote:Ben Youngs withdraws from selection.
He could fly the plane tbf.Dan. Dan. Dan. wrote:He has lost a step. Still not sure I'd play him in the back row though...Banquo wrote:Good old Underwood.whatisthejava wrote:Mental , the back row is so competitive a lions back row of Richie, Underwood and navidi might not even tour.
I’ve edited the original post so you all look weird.whatisthejava wrote:Mental , the back row is so competitive a lions back row of Richie, Underhill and navidi might not even tour.
FTFY.whatisthejava wrote:Mental , the back row is so competitive a lions back row of Richie, Tony Underwood and navidi might not even tour.
Puja winswhatisthejava wrote:I’ve edited the original post so you all look weird.whatisthejava wrote:Mental , the back row is so competitive a lions back row of Richie, Underhill and navidi might not even tour.
Makes senseBanquo wrote: Puja is H