RugbyRebels

WaspInWales wrote:Can't wait to see Trump's comments on London!

"Mainstream media didn't cover it"?
"If you weren't so busy spying on me, you'd have seen him coming"?


More seriously, if the perp is white, it'll be condolences, and a suggestion to arm members of the public. If the perp is Brown, then expect him to double (triple?) down on his Muslim ban

Fuck Trump.


Tiny hands, tiny glans.

FFS

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/us/p ... .html?_r=0

What a cunt.

morepork wrote:FFS

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/us/p ... .html?_r=0

What a cunt.

Fucking cockrash. Like father, like son.

It's a good job we have such a special relationship with the US. A relationship that allows them to piss and shit on us at all political levels and for us just to take it and not kick up too much of a fuss about it. To follow that, we have a PM happy to suck up to, hold the hand of and generally kiss the arse of the fat, orange cunt.

morepork wrote:FFS

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/us/p ... .html?_r=0

What a cunt.

I see my excessively crass suggestions couldn't reach the levels the first family actually sank to.

morepork wrote:FFS

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/us/p ... .html?_r=0

What a cunt.

Classy.

CNN focusing too much on the man/child at the expense of putting the microscope over policy, but links to the Time interview narrative are just fucking surreal. This guy isn't in charge of anything. I mean, how long can this situation persist?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/23/opinions/ ... i-opinion/

Trump delayed his healthcare bill to avoid defeat, and is now telling the GOP if he can't have his changes there'll be no changes and they'll retain Obamacare. Sad

morepork wrote:FFS

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/us/p ... .html?_r=0

What a cunt.

Take a look at @Glinner's Tweet:

morepork wrote:CNN focusing too much on the man/child at the expense of putting the microscope over policy, but links to the Time interview narrative are just fucking surreal. This guy isn't in charge of anything. I mean, how long can this situation persist?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/23/opinions/ ... i-opinion/

Having just read through that, I'm stunned. Genuinely it's hard to describe the personality presented there.

morepork wrote:CNN focusing too much on the man/child at the expense of putting the microscope over policy, but links to the Time interview narrative are just fucking surreal. This guy isn't in charge of anything. I mean, how long can this situation persist?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/23/opinions/ ... i-opinion/

What the fuck?

"He's been prephetic in the past, so you should give him credibility now, even if there are no facts to back up what he says"

Sure was nice of Trump to send condolences to all people, regardless of nationality, involved in the London attack:


He just oozes class.

Poor dab is certainly not having it all his way as the greatest president ever:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39387550

I bet he misses the days when he could do and say what he wanted and get away with it.

Twitter Beserker Meltdown in 3...2..

Too good

It's the Democrat's fault for not supporting it; nothing at all to do with the 30-odd Republicans who also refused to support it; or the fact that it was an absolutely appauling piece of legislation that failed at pretty much every single one of his elections promises on healthcare.

Apparently, he seems to think those Democrats he's blaming are being disloyal:

Trump the Dictwator wrote:"We have to let Obamacare go its own way for a little while," he told reporters at the Oval Office, adding that if the Democrats were "civilised and came together", the two parties could work out a "great healthcare bill".

"We learned about loyalty; we learned a lot about the vote-getting process," he said.

"We were a 10-year opposition party where being against things was easy to do," he said, adding that it was difficult to get "people to agree with each other in how we do things".

So essentially, our opponents should be more loyal to me; and should have learned from the last 10 years where we refused to support anything at all, that they should therefore support me now.

Surprisingly restrained from the POTUS, especially when everybody knows it's the Mexicans and Muslims fault the bill failed.

Way past 30 days and ISIS not touched, and now healthcare reform abandoned (which isn't wholly a bad thing in fairness). I suppose he's managed a few lies, but it's not been much of an administration so far other than for ineptitude and lack of morals

Sweet jesus, what an imbecile:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 50636.html

morepork wrote:Sweet jesus, what an imbecile:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 50636.html

That's just brilliant.

morepork wrote:Sweet jesus, what an imbecile:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 50636.html

Well that's one way to keep allies onside. He really is clueless.

I can imagine him doing that in the boardroom too when 'negotiating' to buy out a company.

He has basically assumed that his previous tactics of bluster and bullying will win. He has yet to realise that international politics, or even domestic politics, isn't that straightforward.

cashead wrote:He's going up against people who have been doing this shit for years, even decades. Does he honestly think they're not going to think of him as anything more than a blustering, small-handed, thin-skinned urophile bullyboy, likely at the beck and call of Moscow, who only got into office through the vagaries of a flawed voting system? Of course they're going to see right through him and outmanoeuvre him without even breaking a sweat.

Inso much as doe actually thinks at all, I genuinely believe that he genuinely believes that approach will work for him. After all, it's worked this far, at least from his perspective.

I think the USA isn't wholly without merit should it claim it picks up an unfair % of military spending. But it's just possible the solution to that is for the USA to spend less, and Trump is trying to spend more, a lot more.