Cricket fred
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Feels a missed chance with 4 players getting in and then not getting a serious score.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Agnew on the radio says it's very hot and humid, so here's hoping we're not bowling until after tea. Though I expect to be bowling after lunch
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
Good start, mindDigby wrote:Agnew on the radio says it's very hot and humid, so here's hoping we're not bowling until after tea. Though I expect to be bowling after lunch
-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Hundreds for Stokes and Pope and a score in excess of 400. Not bad, not at all bad.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Would have liked to have seen xs of 500, but should be not a match-losing position.Some encouraging stuff at last -nice to see new names in the headlines, and Wood firing nicely.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
A really good day, exactly the sort of day I'd like to see 5-6 more of each year
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/51104016
Interesting list actually. Between Jamaica 1990 and Karachi 2000 for me, probably Karachi taking it
Interesting list actually. Between Jamaica 1990 and Karachi 2000 for me, probably Karachi taking it
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Shocking drop from Root just a short while back. Would have been yet another for Bess.
When I noted on day one the pitch didn't look up to much but spin could prove a factor I had no idea if it could, and even if so I wouldn't have guessed this much. Even if we can enforce the follow on I don't know why you wouldn't want to bowl last on this
When I noted on day one the pitch didn't look up to much but spin could prove a factor I had no idea if it could, and even if so I wouldn't have guessed this much. Even if we can enforce the follow on I don't know why you wouldn't want to bowl last on this
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Cricket fred
So in the U19 World Championship, tonight NZ is playing against (checks notes) erm, Japan.
How did that happen?
How did that happen?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
East Asia Pacific regional qualifiers..Lizard wrote:..Japan.
How did that happen?
PNG usually strongest from them parts, but what's this?
'Japan were scheduled to play Papua New Guinea in their final qualification fixture, but Papua New Guinea forfeited the match. The Papua New Guinea Cricket Board later suspended ten of the players for a year, after bringing the game into disrepute following a shoplifting incident'
Sounds like it was a team effort

Not sure where Singapore or HK fit in these days.
Jap get same points as NZ from the opening fixture.
That will disappoint.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
..unlike the start to D4 by Eng.
3 taken in the first 3 overs for nowt - the follow-on will be visiting soon.
u/d: how soon is now ? 3 for Broad, wrapped up in 5 overs, just 1 to the total. Decent porridge, clearly.
3 taken in the first 3 overs for nowt - the follow-on will be visiting soon.

u/d: how soon is now ? 3 for Broad, wrapped up in 5 overs, just 1 to the total. Decent porridge, clearly.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Rain probably forced the hand on the follow on, but probably the right call when things wrapped up so quickly, and then especially with the rain, fingers crossed not for rain (for once)
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
SA appear adamant thst 4-day tests are the way forward.. good to have real nift in the bowling armoury.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
That was a weird catch by Wood. No idea what SA think they're doing, bar not thinking
-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Piece of cake this test cricket, isnt it?
England have played well but SA have been pretty wretched since the start of day 2 when Stokes and Pope took the game away from them.
England have played well but SA have been pretty wretched since the start of day 2 when Stokes and Pope took the game away from them.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
SA today look like a team not used to test cricket, day 3 of match 3 and it's all just piling up. Also like us their batting is..., inconsistentfivepointer wrote:Piece of cake this test cricket, isnt it?
England have played well but SA have been pretty wretched since the start of day 2 when Stokes and Pope took the game away from them.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
SA are a poor side.Digby wrote:SA today look like a team not used to test cricket, day 3 of match 3 and it's all just piling up. Also like us their batting is..., inconsistentfivepointer wrote:Piece of cake this test cricket, isnt it?
England have played well but SA have been pretty wretched since the start of day 2 when Stokes and Pope took the game away from them.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
Root bowling himself over after ineffective over chasing his 5fer...not the sign of a good captain.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
It's taken a while to really show, perhaps being masked by the first innings performance in the first test. They've had moments since then, but aren't putting in back to back sessions where they're better than competitive, and that whilst losing a good few sessionsBanquo wrote:SA are a poor side.Digby wrote:SA today look like a team not used to test cricket, day 3 of match 3 and it's all just piling up. Also like us their batting is..., inconsistentfivepointer wrote:Piece of cake this test cricket, isnt it?
England have played well but SA have been pretty wretched since the start of day 2 when Stokes and Pope took the game away from them.
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Dom Bess rewarded for a five for by being dropped for Woakes. I get it’s likely a seamers pitch, but surely that’s an excellent test as to whether he can hold down an end- vital if we end up with Archer and Wood and Stokes in the same attack.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
Good for Bess to have to learn to deal with such a pitch, and Root needs the practice using spinners
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Indeed. Now we’ve reverted to collapsing type, even Stokes has failedDigby wrote:Good for Bess to have to learn to deal with such a pitch, and Root needs the practice using spinners
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cricket fred
I find I barely care. I know Denly and Root give some options, but if they want to play without a spinner they don't deserve to do wellBanquo wrote:Indeed. Now we’ve reverted to collapsing type, even Stokes has failedDigby wrote:Good for Bess to have to learn to deal with such a pitch, and Root needs the practice using spinners
-
- Posts: 19149
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
SA have done the same but I get your point.Digby wrote:I find I barely care. I know Denly and Root give some options, but if they want to play without a spinner they don't deserve to do wellBanquo wrote:Indeed. Now we’ve reverted to collapsing type, even Stokes has failedDigby wrote:Good for Bess to have to learn to deal with such a pitch, and Root needs the practice using spinners
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
After the usual mid-order fart, steady progress by Buttler mbe & Woakes, who presumably is in to stiffen the tail/bowl tightly and help secure the series win, if not this match.
Less than 350 would be below par first up here.
Less than 350 would be below par first up here.