Re: Brexit delayed
Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:44 am
Predictions now folks? Extended to 22nd May if WA passes. If it fails, 12th April.
Number 2 in the charts and risingSandydragon wrote:Petition up to 2.4 million now.
Surely someone will amend a ref onto the wa motion. So we could then be forced to ask for another extension for the ref...Banquo wrote:Predictions now folks? Extended to 22nd May if WA passes. If it fails, 12th April.
Wouldn’t surprise me.Stom wrote:Surely someone will amend a ref onto the wa motion. So we could then be forced to ask for another extension for the ref...Banquo wrote:Predictions now folks? Extended to 22nd May if WA passes. If it fails, 12th April.
Its going to dragon for years isnt it...Sandydragon wrote:Wouldn’t surprise me.Stom wrote:Surely someone will amend a ref onto the wa motion. So we could then be forced to ask for another extension for the ref...Banquo wrote:Predictions now folks? Extended to 22nd May if WA passes. If it fails, 12th April.
This keeps on being said, but what? The ineluctable evidence is that this is a gordian knot of epic proportions. May is utterly useless, but imo a combination of Kissinger, Mandela and Mother Teresa (:)) could not get anything agreed that doesn't either fck us up, or makes leaving entirely pointless. For a start, Corbyn needs to be honest and say that his proposal is so close to staying in the EU, that we should be staying in.fivepointer wrote:"That is the last chance saloon. Europe has provided a final opportunity for MPs to take control of this situation from a PM who is demonstrably not up to it. They must grasp it"
Ian Dunt, right as usual.
Now is the time MPs. Over to you.
This. Philip Collins had a good idea yesterday’s Times: a Brexit death match. All options put on the table and they keep having votes, with the loser dropping out, until we have a winner. Massively flawed but then that is true of whatever outcome we reach. Plus, UK plc could sell the TV rights.Banquo wrote:This keeps on being said, but what? The ineluctable evidence is that this is a gordian knot of epic proportions. May is utterly useless, but imo a combination of Kissinger, Mandela and Mother Teresa (:)) could not get anything agreed that doesn't either fck us up, or makes leaving entirely pointless. For a start, Corbyn needs to be honest and say that his proposal is so close to staying in the EU, that we should be staying in.fivepointer wrote:"That is the last chance saloon. Europe has provided a final opportunity for MPs to take control of this situation from a PM who is demonstrably not up to it. They must grasp it"
Ian Dunt, right as usual.
Now is the time MPs. Over to you.
Fck knows
No no, Its all her fault because they didn't have the opportunity before! Or...Mellsblue wrote:Proof, if proof we’re needed, that parliament will struggle to answer the question just as much as May.
If that's a reflection on Welsh rugby dominance then I'm all for it!!Banquo wrote:Its going to dragon for years isnt it...Sandydragon wrote:Wouldn’t surprise me.Stom wrote:
Surely someone will amend a ref onto the wa motion. So we could then be forced to ask for another extension for the ref...
More a play on your usernameSandydragon wrote:If that's a reflection on Welsh rugby dominance then I'm all for it!!Banquo wrote:Its going to dragon for years isnt it...Sandydragon wrote: Wouldn’t surprise me.
He's mooted that before, I'd prefer not a series of choices that whittle down the options but a one time ranking of preference votingMellsblue wrote:This. Philip Collins had a good idea yesterday’s Times: a Brexit death match. All options put on the table and they keep having votes, with the loser dropping out, until we have a winner. Massively flawed but then that is true of whatever outcome we reach. Plus, UK plc could sell the TV rights.Banquo wrote:This keeps on being said, but what? The ineluctable evidence is that this is a gordian knot of epic proportions. May is utterly useless, but imo a combination of Kissinger, Mandela and Mother Teresa (:)) could not get anything agreed that doesn't either fck us up, or makes leaving entirely pointless. For a start, Corbyn needs to be honest and say that his proposal is so close to staying in the EU, that we should be staying in.fivepointer wrote:"That is the last chance saloon. Europe has provided a final opportunity for MPs to take control of this situation from a PM who is demonstrably not up to it. They must grasp it"
Ian Dunt, right as usual.
Now is the time MPs. Over to you.
Fck knows
A quick response there, like grease lightening actuallyBanquo wrote:More a play on your usernameSandydragon wrote:If that's a reflection on Welsh rugby dominance then I'm all for it!!Banquo wrote: Its going to dragon for years isnt it...
I like to think I have considerable staying powerBanquo wrote:More a play on your usernameSandydragon wrote:If that's a reflection on Welsh rugby dominance then I'm all for it!!Banquo wrote: Its going to dragon for years isnt it...
well exactly, plus associated regs and customs arrangements. People seem very aerated about 'the deal', which isn't a deal, just a milestone and protection for a lot of the things that no-one seems to talk about for a couple of years. Nothing like as good as not leaving but hey.Digby wrote:A reasonable concern for some is we don't know what the options are until we finalise future trade agreements (assuming we'd be doing that) with the EU and others
Sandydragon wrote:I like to think I have considerable staying powerBanquo wrote:More a play on your usernameSandydragon wrote: If that's a reflection on Welsh rugby dominance then I'm all for it!!
While I generally agree that "the people" can't be trusted to make a decision on anything with any particular skill, I'm in favour simply because it seems to be the only way out of this impasse. Parliament can't get a majority for anything and, left to their own devices, will just stumble to No Deal.Banquo wrote:I'm so sorry that I really don't believe that even when explained again the public will make a good choice. I thought plenty was explained first time round, and the consequences we now see were pretty clear even if at a helicopter level.
Exactly. And the argument that Brexit is easy has been removed from the table. We haven’t seen any of the truely bad effects of leaving yet so that makes the remain task harder, but it was a crap tactic anyway last time.Puja wrote:While I generally agree that "the people" can't be trusted to make a decision on anything with any particular skill, I'm in favour simply because it seems to be the only way out of this impasse. Parliament can't get a majority for anything and, left to their own devices, will just stumble to No Deal.Banquo wrote:I'm so sorry that I really don't believe that even when explained again the public will make a good choice. I thought plenty was explained first time round, and the consequences we now see were pretty clear even if at a helicopter level.
Get an ordered preference referendum of "May's deal", "No Deal", "No Brexit," and then we'll have *a* decision and can press forward with that.
Puja
Hmm, maybe. Be interesting to actually 'game' that, knowing what we know from polls and see what the predicted outcome would be....Puja wrote:While I generally agree that "the people" can't be trusted to make a decision on anything with any particular skill, I'm in favour simply because it seems to be the only way out of this impasse. Parliament can't get a majority for anything and, left to their own devices, will just stumble to No Deal.Banquo wrote:I'm so sorry that I really don't believe that even when explained again the public will make a good choice. I thought plenty was explained first time round, and the consequences we now see were pretty clear even if at a helicopter level.
Get an ordered preference referendum of "May's deal", "No Deal", "No Brexit," and then we'll have *a* decision and can press forward with that.
Puja