Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 1:27 pm
Confusion again from Archer, or maybe he was just using that over to warm up
I will give him credit where it's due - he has clearly worked hard on his keeping across his career and, while the flurry of mistakes last test won't stop worrying me about his reliability going forward, he's played a blinder this game so far and showed great mental strength under pressure.Banquo wrote:If Jimmy ends his career on 599, Broads drop will be even more embarrassing.
Amazing how Buttler has gone from being not up to the job to being a heroic keeper in the space of one innings.
quickest volte face in history #justsayingPuja wrote:I will give him credit where it's due - he has clearly worked hard on his keeping across his career and, while the flurry of mistakes last test won't stop worrying me about his reliability going forward, he's played a blinder this game so far and showed great mental strength under pressure.Banquo wrote:If Jimmy ends his career on 599, Broads drop will be even more embarrassing.
Amazing how Buttler has gone from being not up to the job to being a heroic keeper in the space of one innings.
Puja
I adjust my views when the evidence changes! I'm not jngf!Banquo wrote:quickest volte face in history #justsayingPuja wrote:I will give him credit where it's due - he has clearly worked hard on his keeping across his career and, while the flurry of mistakes last test won't stop worrying me about his reliability going forward, he's played a blinder this game so far and showed great mental strength under pressure.Banquo wrote:If Jimmy ends his career on 599, Broads drop will be even more embarrassing.
Amazing how Buttler has gone from being not up to the job to being a heroic keeper in the space of one innings.
Puja
Puja wrote:I adjust my views when the evidence changes! I'm not jngf!Banquo wrote:quickest volte face in history #justsayingPuja wrote:
I will give him credit where it's due - he has clearly worked hard on his keeping across his career and, while the flurry of mistakes last test won't stop worrying me about his reliability going forward, he's played a blinder this game so far and showed great mental strength under pressure.
Puja![]()
Puja
yeah he's sh&t drop him. That is a really bad one to be fair.Mellsblue wrote:Buttler now back to being the worst ‘keeper in the world. Anderson could be at 700 if they’d taken all their catches.
Wow, thanks Joss! Waited until after I'd praised him for maximum comic effect.Banquo wrote:yeah he's sh&t drop him. That is a really bad one to be fair.Mellsblue wrote:Buttler now back to being the worst ‘keeper in the world. Anderson could be at 700 if they’d taken all their catches.
Probs are reality of a small bubble and MBE exemption from the rules.Puja wrote:Wow, thanks Joss! Waited until after I'd praised him for maximum comic effect.Banquo wrote:yeah he's sh&t drop him. That is a really bad one to be fair.Mellsblue wrote:Buttler now back to being the worst ‘keeper in the world. Anderson could be at 700 if they’d taken all their catches.
Paul Collingwood is on as a sub fielder! How does that work? Surely a coach can't just randomly decide to come onto the pitch and show everyone how it's done?
Puja
They released a whole load of players, and Woody was probably having a cuppa.Puja wrote:Wow, thanks Joss! Waited until after I'd praised him for maximum comic effect.Banquo wrote:yeah he's sh&t drop him. That is a really bad one to be fair.Mellsblue wrote:Buttler now back to being the worst ‘keeper in the world. Anderson could be at 700 if they’d taken all their catches.
Paul Collingwood is on as a sub fielder! How does that work? Surely a coach can't just randomly decide to come onto the pitch and show everyone how it's done?
Puja
Can you not pick whoever you want as a sub fielder? If Collingwood is there why not use him?Mellsblue wrote:Probs are reality of a small bubble and MBE exemption from the rules.Puja wrote:Wow, thanks Joss! Waited until after I'd praised him for maximum comic effect.Banquo wrote: yeah he's sh&t drop him. That is a really bad one to be fair.
Paul Collingwood is on as a sub fielder! How does that work? Surely a coach can't just randomly decide to come onto the pitch and show everyone how it's done?
Puja
whether it wobbled I don't know, but going under the ball was very oddDigby wrote:Can you not pick whoever you want as a sub fielder? If Collingwood is there why not use him?Mellsblue wrote:Probs are reality of a small bubble and MBE exemption from the rules.Puja wrote:
Wow, thanks Joss! Waited until after I'd praised him for maximum comic effect.
Paul Collingwood is on as a sub fielder! How does that work? Surely a coach can't just randomly decide to come onto the pitch and show everyone how it's done?
Puja
It was an awful drop by Buttler, so bad it's not even really a drop given his hands don't seem to touch the ball.
He does seem to want to work off a firm base with his footwork, that grants him a lot of power in his batting but at other times it denies him flexibility to correct. Or maybe he'd just nodded off, and he has in fairness given a lot of hours to this match already after the batting unit failed, some of the underlying root cause might be RootBanquo wrote:whether it wobbled I don't know, but going under the ball was very oddDigby wrote:Can you not pick whoever you want as a sub fielder? If Collingwood is there why not use him?Mellsblue wrote: Probs are reality of a small bubble and MBE exemption from the rules.
It was an awful drop by Buttler, so bad it's not even really a drop given his hands don't seem to touch the ball.
Equally Crawley was likely knackered, they ran for a lot of their partnership! Not sure what Burns or Broad's excuses wereDigby wrote:He does seem to want to work off a firm base with his footwork, that grants him a lot of power in his batting but at other times it denies him flexibility to correct. Or maybe he'd just nodded off, and he has in fairness given a lot of hours to this match already after the batting unit failed, some of the underlying root cause might be RootBanquo wrote:whether it wobbled I don't know, but going under the ball was very oddDigby wrote:
Can you not pick whoever you want as a sub fielder? If Collingwood is there why not use him?
It was an awful drop by Buttler, so bad it's not even really a drop given his hands don't seem to touch the ball.
It did just look like a complete misjudgement from start to finish - I don't think it wobbled or needed him to correct, it just looked like sheer unadulterated cockup. Mind, as you said, he's given a lot of hours to this match and it is a risk of following on.Digby wrote:He does seem to want to work off a firm base with his footwork, that grants him a lot of power in his batting but at other times it denies him flexibility to correct. Or maybe he'd just nodded off, and he has in fairness given a lot of hours to this match already after the batting unit failed, some of the underlying root cause might be RootBanquo wrote:whether it wobbled I don't know, but going under the ball was very oddDigby wrote:
Can you not pick whoever you want as a sub fielder? If Collingwood is there why not use him?
It was an awful drop by Buttler, so bad it's not even really a drop given his hands don't seem to touch the ball.
Yeah, for openers it’s when the umpires call play.Digby wrote:I thought perhaps maybe it did a bit once it had gone past the bat, perhaps that was an optical illusion created by Buttler going in the wrong direction. Either way there's no chance he doesn't think he should be taking that
As a query why wasn't Ali opening today? I'd assumed when he walked out last night he'd walked out to bat, clearly that's not the case until when, when the umpire calls play?