RugbyRebels

I was sitting in the departure lounge of London City Airport when I heard the news of the 1st aircraft flying into the WTC. As with so many others, I presumed it was a dreadful accident, but was watching the TV when the 2nd aircraft struck and news of other hijackings was coming out. I had just been to recce Stanford training area for my battalion's training later that year. It was immediately and brutally obvious that it had been a wasted morning; everything would change.

Surprisingly, there were no delays and I was in the air when the towers came down.

Scientists on here, who is the European Scientific Journal and are they credible?

http://educateinspirechange.org/alterna ... emolition/

It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of theEuropean Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts aneditorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The ESJ didn't publish it.

http://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/09/th ... emolition/

It's dogshit. Is an "open access" journal, meaning you have to pay upfront costs to submit an article (as opposed to paying publication costs after it has been reviewed or accepted). Has an impact factor of ~0.5. Nature, which is also multidisciplinary, has an impact factor of over 38...


plus they published no such conclusion.

morepork wrote:It's dogshit. Is an "open access" journal, meaning you have to pay upfront costs to submit an article (as opposed to paying publication costs after it has been reviewed or accepted). Has an impact factor of ~0.5. Nature, which is also multidisciplinary, has an impact factor of over 38...


plus they published no such conclusion.

Cheers!

Not a controlled demolition. But that doesn't make the conspiracy theorists wrong.
A US ally funding terrorist cells ?.........there is more that history will say about 9/11,... that much is certain.

But given the US beauraucratic determination to never reveal their governments nefarious behaviour I doubt it will be in my lifetime. Lady Di, David Kelly et al.......we ain't much better and we have a welter of history of nefarious behaviour from our monarchy and governance to draw on. It only remains to compare the activities of UK monarchy as portrayed in Shakespeare to the actual verity to see that.

Henry V..?......Twat who utterly disregarded the laws of chivalry to murder his POW's and win a cheap, unlikely and underhand victory in someone else's homeland.

kk67 wrote:

Henry V..?......Twat who utterly disregarded the laws of chivalry to murder his POW's and win a cheap, unlikely and underhand victory in someone else's homeland.

That's a slightly simplistic historical interpretation. Early English kings had as many French connections as the French monarchy did, France wasn't an entirely foreign country to them.

Saudi has had a difficult relationship with its religious extremists for decades. It wouldn't surprise me if a faction was involved. I doubt it was government policy, but there is certainly enough of a government connection for the US not to want to embarrass one of its key allies, even if it is an ally that causes a number of ethical issues.

Sandydragon wrote:

kk67 wrote:

Henry V..?......Twat who utterly disregarded the laws of chivalry to murder his POW's and win a cheap, unlikely and underhand victory in someone else's homeland.

That's a slightly simplistic historical interpretation. Early English kings had as many French connections as the French monarchy did, France wasn't an entirely foreign country to them.

Saudi has had a difficult relationship with its religious extremists for decades. It wouldn't surprise me if a faction was involved. I doubt it was government policy, but there is certainly enough of a government connection for the US not to want to embarrass one of its key allies, even if it is an ally that causes a number of ethical issues.

The Frogs didn't execute their POW's...Henry did.
The Saudi's don't really have factions.......they're so wealthy that dissent doesn't happen.

The Saudis are the extremists - the family that is. These are medieval, fundamentalist, sexist, racist, homophobic mass-murdering terrorists and torturers. & what other country is named after the family that runs it Nice work again, Poms, bringing the Wahabbis to power in order to destabilized the Ottoman Empire!