If Peyper had checked his inbox for directives from the IRB this week then a couple of All Blacks could have been in real trouble.Len wrote:He fell into that too. Just kidding. That was high as fuck.
Ire v NZ - Dublin
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Very much looking forward to England at the Aviva in the 6 nations.Mellsblue wrote:This is a bloody good test match.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2460
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Yes. People throwing themselves about. Great stuff.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
16th man wrote:If Peyper had checked his inbox for directives from the IRB this week then a couple of All Blacks could have been in real trouble.Len wrote:He fell into that too. Just kidding. That was high as fuck.
Very pithy.
- Len
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I changed his password. Tee hee.16th man wrote:If Peyper had checked his inbox for directives from the IRB this week then a couple of All Blacks could have been in real trouble.Len wrote:He fell into that too. Just kidding. That was high as fuck.
Thats not to say Ireland would win. They only just made 1 line break.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Great hard nosed game. Ireland gave it a good thrash, given that they lost three key players in Sexton, Henshaw and Stander. O'Brien lasted the pace better than anticipated and looked like his old self,Van der Flier is a real live wire and Ringrose did not look out of place. Furlong shaping up as a tremendous TH and he's only 23. Great AB defence all game.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I thoroughly enjoyed that. Proper hard fought test match. Ireland just fierce for the full 80, and if they had managed to nab a try they would have gone berserk. ABs defence was superb though. Our loosies took a bit of a schooling, which is a project for Hansen. We need a big-hitting minter at 6. England Ireland in the 6N shaping up to be quite tasty.
Hopefully the two teams enjoyed a couple of shandies together afterwards.
Hopefully the two teams enjoyed a couple of shandies together afterwards.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Enormously frustrating game. We just weren't clever enough. We weren't clever enough with the ball and we weren't clever enough to adjust to the refereeing.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
The big difference was the midfield. Ireland got no change whatsoever, they were constantly faced with a wall of black, whilst NZ made some telling line breaks. How much of that was losing Sexton and Henshaw, with a young 13 playing at 12, and how much to do with NZ tactics is difficult to say but it was, for me, a crucial factor.
Also, why is Cane picked ahead of Savea?
Also, why is Cane picked ahead of Savea?
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Small eyes and cruel bloodless lips.Mellsblue wrote:The big difference was the midfield. Ireland got no change whatsoever, they were constantly faced with a wall of black, whilst NZ made some telling line breaks. How much of that was losing Sexton and Henshaw, with a young 13 playing at 12, and how much to do with NZ tactics is difficult to say but it was, for me, a crucial factor.
Also, why is Cane picked ahead of Savea?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I think for the same reason EJ doesn't touch Kvesic. They trust Cane not to lose in contact, whether going back in defence or getting over their ball to protect it.Mellsblue wrote:
Also, why is Cane picked ahead of Savea?
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:16 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Heh.morepork wrote:Small eyes and cruel bloodless lips.Mellsblue wrote:The big difference was the midfield. Ireland got no change whatsoever, they were constantly faced with a wall of black, whilst NZ made some telling line breaks. How much of that was losing Sexton and Henshaw, with a young 13 playing at 12, and how much to do with NZ tactics is difficult to say but it was, for me, a crucial factor.
Also, why is Cane picked ahead of Savea?
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
It seems that some of your countrymen are a little more one-eyed about this test than the fine Irish members of this boards:
http://news.rugbypass.com/view/irish-fa ... lacks-game
Honestly, you get one win over us and some of you think you're now entitled to carry on like Welshmen. It's a poor look, Ireland, poor look.
http://news.rugbypass.com/view/irish-fa ... lacks-game
Honestly, you get one win over us and some of you think you're now entitled to carry on like Welshmen. It's a poor look, Ireland, poor look.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Quite. I'm still just happy that Ireland unexpectedly but convincingly humped yer arse a couple of weeks ago in Chicago and got the monkey off our back.Lizard wrote:It seems that some of your countrymen are a little more one-eyed about this test than the fine Irish members of this boards:
http://news.rugbypass.com/view/irish-fa ... lacks-game
Honestly, you get one win over us and some of you think you're now entitled to carry on like Welshmen. It's a poor look, Ireland, poor look.
From what I see, most genuine Ireland rugby fans who know a bit about the game, would acknowledge that, despite 60+% possession and territory, Ireland was not able to unlock the tremendous AB defence and score a try, while NZ took their chances and were worth the win. I did think Pyper had a poor game all round (and not his first one) but was not responsible for the Ireland loss.
A hard-fought two match series that ended in a draw. Pity there is not a decider with two fully fit teams going at it full bore.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Aye. Bloody good series it was. I don't mind the lack of decider. It will make the next test we have pretty tasty, too.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- cashead
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Yep. As SomethingAwful forums Rabbi T White put it:Lizard wrote:It seems that some of your countrymen are a little more one-eyed about this test than the fine Irish members of this boards:
http://news.rugbypass.com/view/irish-fa ... lacks-game
Honestly, you get one win over us and some of you think you're now entitled to carry on like Welshmen. It's a poor look, Ireland, poor look.


Neither of those were even given penalties. Please continue on about the unfair reffing.
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
To be fair he gave ye a try instead of the penalty for the bottom one..
Idle Feck
- cashead
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Could've been a penalty try, and it's actually preposterous that he wasn't carded, let alone cited for it.
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I agree that it could have been a penalty try - only could, mind and then only because Pyper is so fecking feeble.
1st things 1st, Beaueuaudeuan didn't ground the ball, so no try scored. Pyper should have backed what he was seeing and not be swayed by the bloke in the portacabin. 2nd things 2nd, to compare the wrapping of arms and legs by Sexton in the chase with the full-on arm-swinging shyte that Pyper allowed to pass as tackles is grasping at straws. But then again, so was Sexton's efforts to stop Barrett scoring and so are Irish attempts to suggest that Pyper was responsible for us losing a test match that, despite the lion's share of possession, we never looked like winning. Pyper has form with failing to ref the brutality out of a French side that set out to push the limits against us in Paris last year, so we probably have more of a beef against him that any of your lads.
It was a hard fought test and you lot deserve to be able to enjoy the winning of it. No complaints from this Paddy.
1st things 1st, Beaueuaudeuan didn't ground the ball, so no try scored. Pyper should have backed what he was seeing and not be swayed by the bloke in the portacabin. 2nd things 2nd, to compare the wrapping of arms and legs by Sexton in the chase with the full-on arm-swinging shyte that Pyper allowed to pass as tackles is grasping at straws. But then again, so was Sexton's efforts to stop Barrett scoring and so are Irish attempts to suggest that Pyper was responsible for us losing a test match that, despite the lion's share of possession, we never looked like winning. Pyper has form with failing to ref the brutality out of a French side that set out to push the limits against us in Paris last year, so we probably have more of a beef against him that any of your lads.
It was a hard fought test and you lot deserve to be able to enjoy the winning of it. No complaints from this Paddy.
Idle Feck
- Spy
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:58 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
There were too many high shots from the All Blacks. As well as the ones that were penalised, there were probably one or two more that should have been penalised, and a further two or three that could have been penalised.
I think the cited offences were appropriately dealt with on the day, so shouldn't receive further sanction. But I also think our careless tackling technique overall put us at risk, and it may be that we pay a price in the judiciary that we got away with on the field, to a certain extent.
I think the cited offences were appropriately dealt with on the day, so shouldn't receive further sanction. But I also think our careless tackling technique overall put us at risk, and it may be that we pay a price in the judiciary that we got away with on the field, to a certain extent.
- hellovating
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:59 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
citings are reserved for possible red card offences. sexton's tackle was high, but nowhere near a red.cashead wrote:Could've been a penalty try, and it's actually preposterous that he wasn't carded, let alone cited for it.
cane's could have been, under the new directives. clearly shoulder to head.
i think fekitoa is unlucky to be cited.


- BBD
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I hereby claim the moral victory
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
I would like to claim a pyrrhic victory, but I'm not sure its worth the effort.
Idle Feck
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin
Unlucky feckitoa, right enough.hellovating wrote:
i think fekitoa is unlucky to be cited.
Idle Feck