Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:40 am
Hell of a good take by Seymour on the run.
Both sides have been quite loose with the ball but certainly made for an exciting game. Far better than the turgid stuff of the weekend just gone. Well played Highlanders.zer0 wrote:The Highlanders ball security has been utterly abysmal tonight. So many wasted opportunities.
Yeah. That's in no way an exaggeration!hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Brilliant result for the Highlanders. Lions absolutely pathetic - in every game so far.
They are pathetic. They stutter against depleted club teams.El Tigre wrote:Yeah. That's in no way an exaggeration!hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Brilliant result for the Highlanders. Lions absolutely pathetic - in every game so far.
It's all relative. I'm of the belief that there are a set of players & coaches with a game plan that that could sweep aside the club teams and be competitive with the ABs. So yes... relatively speaking they are absolutely dreadful and pathetic.El Tigre wrote:Poor discipline at the breakdown and set piece (and obviously Farrell) cost them the game. They can't expect to win when giving up 15 penalties.
Still not sure I'd go as far as absolutely pathetic though.
no, he was desparate in the first half.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
Bit mixed; 80% good, but bounced a couple of times, and dropped the ball in the last play.Puja wrote:How's Joseph looking? I'm stuck at work so I can't watch.
Puja
Can't think of any that put their hand up for a test spot but quite a few confirmed they will not be bothering the 23.Banquo wrote:no, he was desparate in the first half.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
JJ had a mixed game, playing well in the main, but bounced once crucially and dropped the final pass, albeit bulleted at his chest.
Bet you wouldn't now....Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'm pretty sure it will be North, Watson and 1/2p with Williams on the bench. I'd probably choose Seymour Watson and Williams.Mikey Brown wrote:Who are we currently viewing as the frontrunners the Test back 3?
I feel like Watson is there somewhere. Is that it?
Took his try well, tackled hard, dropped a kick that he would normally catch with his eyes shut. But he suffered from the same problem all of the Lions' back 3 have suffered from: nobody is creating space for them. Not enough organisation and not enough creativity.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
er.....did you not watch the first 20 when his defence would have embarrassed my gran. He had a mare in the first half.Matt Ha wrote:Took his try well, tackled hard, dropped a kick that he would normally catch with his eyes shut. But he suffered from the same problem all of the Lions' back 3 have suffered from: nobody is creating space for them. Not enough organisation and not enough creativity.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
It was a good game for Watson,North and Liam Williams.Banquo wrote:er.....did you not watch the first 20 when his defence would have embarrassed my gran. He had a mare in the first half.Matt Ha wrote:Took his try well, tackled hard, dropped a kick that he would normally catch with his eyes shut. But he suffered from the same problem all of the Lions' back 3 have suffered from: nobody is creating space for them. Not enough organisation and not enough creativity.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
Handling skills under pressure is a surprise; kick pass is a bit over used but you can see why they do it.Timbo wrote:As someone who only watches Super Rugby occasionally, the things that have impressed me from the Kiwi franchises this far; organisation, attacking and defending set piece, physicality, skills in the air, discipline...quite disappointing; handling skills under pressure and kick pass (used far to often and to little effect).
Not exactly what you'd expect.