Page 2 of 4
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:35 am
by Lizard
I didn't think the Landers would have the cattle for this, but it's a cracking match so far.
Bit too much headless chook stuff again though.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:38 am
by Puja
How's Joseph looking? I'm stuck at work so I can't watch.
Puja
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:40 am
by zer0
Hell of a good take by Seymour on the run.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:57 am
by Spy
Lions very hard to break down. That's great defence.
Sent from my SM-G900FD using Tapatalk
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:59 am
by Spy
Haha. Hexed 'em.
Sent from my SM-G900FD using Tapatalk
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:00 am
by cashead
Spy wrote:Lions very hard to break down. That's great defence.
Sent from my SM-G900FD using Tapatalk
Hey look what just happened!
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:11 am
by zer0
The Highlanders ball security has been utterly abysmal tonight. So many wasted opportunities.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:13 am
by cashead
Yeah, but they're winning it back without much fuss either.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:14 am
by cashead
Dat scrum.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:17 am
by hugh_woatmeigh
Dan Cole getting savaged at scrum time. Is anyone surprised?
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:22 am
by Spy
FT 23-22 Highlanders. Fucking cracker.
Sent from my SM-G900FD using Tapatalk
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:23 am
by onlynameleft
zer0 wrote:The Highlanders ball security has been utterly abysmal tonight. So many wasted opportunities.
Both sides have been quite loose with the ball but certainly made for an exciting game. Far better than the turgid stuff of the weekend just gone. Well played Highlanders.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:23 am
by hugh_woatmeigh
Brilliant result for the Highlanders. Lions absolutely pathetic - in every game so far.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:27 am
by Digby
Good job the iceman had his kicking boots
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:28 am
by El Tigre
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Brilliant result for the Highlanders. Lions absolutely pathetic - in every game so far.
Yeah. That's in no way an exaggeration!

Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:29 am
by hugh_woatmeigh
El Tigre wrote:hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Brilliant result for the Highlanders. Lions absolutely pathetic - in every game so far.
Yeah. That's in no way an exaggeration!

They are pathetic. They stutter against depleted club teams.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:37 am
by El Tigre
Poor discipline at the breakdown and set piece (and obviously Farrell

) cost them the game. They can't expect to win when giving up 15 penalties.
Still not sure I'd go as far as absolutely pathetic though.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:38 am
by hugh_woatmeigh
El Tigre wrote:Poor discipline at the breakdown and set piece (and obviously Farrell

) cost them the game. They can't expect to win when giving up 15 penalties.
Still not sure I'd go as far as absolutely pathetic though.
It's all relative. I'm of the belief that there are a set of players & coaches with a game plan that that could sweep aside the club teams and be competitive with the ABs. So yes... relatively speaking they are absolutely dreadful and pathetic.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:42 am
by canta_brian
And the winner is... the stadium. Don't think I have ever seen a bad game played there. Hope Chch builds one soon. Might encourage us to be a bit more adventurous.
Apart from that, about right result wise. Lions would probably have won if they hadn't pulled a few players to save their legs. Webb in particular stands out.
I see Lawes knocked 7 bells out of himself (or should that be 7 bells into himself being Lawes). Stander improved int he 2nd half. Needed to, he seemed to be a one man penalty machine for the first 40.
Think the ABs have picked the right midfield. Fekitoa did himself no favours on a couple of occasions.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:46 am
by Mikey Brown
Did Seymour make a case?
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:49 am
by Banquo
Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
no, he was desparate in the first half.
JJ had a mixed game, playing well in the main, but bounced once crucially and dropped the final pass, albeit bulleted at his chest.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:52 am
by Banquo
Puja wrote:How's Joseph looking? I'm stuck at work so I can't watch.
Puja
Bit mixed; 80% good, but bounced a couple of times, and dropped the ball in the last play.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:53 am
by skidger
Banquo wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
no, he was desparate in the first half.
JJ had a mixed game, playing well in the main, but bounced once crucially and dropped the final pass, albeit bulleted at his chest.
Can't think of any that put their hand up for a test spot but quite a few confirmed they will not be bothering the 23.
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:53 am
by Banquo
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:Who are we currently viewing as the frontrunners the Test back 3?
I feel like Watson is there somewhere. Is that it?
I'm pretty sure it will be North, Watson and 1/2p with Williams on the bench. I'd probably choose
Seymour Watson and Williams.
Bet you wouldn't now....
Re: V Highlanders
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:58 am
by Matt Ha
Mikey Brown wrote:Did Seymour make a case?
Took his try well, tackled hard, dropped a kick that he would normally catch with his eyes shut. But he suffered from the same problem all of the Lions' back 3 have suffered from: nobody is creating space for them. Not enough organisation and not enough creativity.