I am sorry, but I don't want to have the context changed and become beguiled by the argument on immigration in the UK - that too is one of the tactics often used to divert from the debate on the issue at hand.Sandydragon wrote:But some people do undermine their own arguments. In this particular context, blaming Israel for every event in the world they find bad in some way. Israelis pulling a the strings of western leaders. It's an evolution of the blood libel and pushes that anti Israeli message into something a bit more sinister. What about active online campaigners against Israel who refuse to accept any facts that's counter their argument, we condemn Trump for his fake news approach do we not?
Having said that, I agree with you again. Some do extrapolate from a legitimate position of protest to one which stretches and then exceeds the bounds of acceptable argument or debate.
To suggest, as some may have done, that the financial crash of 2008 was the work of a global Jewish conspiracy is clearly falacious and anti-Semitic to boot. To suggest that there is a Jewish lobby in America, that it is extremely powerful and that it has an influence on American state policy is not falacious and not, I would argue, anti-Semitic when such a situation has a clear bearing on the freedom of Israel to act illegally.
I do not deny any American the right to lobby his own government or at least not until that lobbying impacts on another state's freedom to perpetrate or persist in activity that the International Community has determined to be illegal.
In this explicit context (Macron's conflation of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism) I would maintain that it is entirely reasonable to blame Zionism for the unsustainable demands placed on an Israeli state confined to its pre-1967 (And Internationally recognised) boundaries; It is not reasonable to blame Jews.