Surely Jonny May would step in.Puja wrote:Good point, although that is a niche situation. If Clifford has been on the bench, who would've gone lock. None of Wilson or Curry have the build, so it would've been bodge o'clock between Clifford and Billy.Oakboy wrote:I can understand the comments against Hughes but it was lucky that he was there to play adequately in the 2nd row as Kruis had already been replaced when Itoje was injured. Unfortunately, the only other bench candidate for that is Shields so I'd much prefer to stick with Hughes.
Puja
Team for France
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:38 pm
Re: Team for France
-
- Posts: 3451
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Team for France
3 or 4 inches.Stom wrote:Not for a while, but he's not much shorter than Itoje. Similar to George Robson was, I think.Puja wrote:He has? Huh, every day a school day.Stom wrote:
Clifford has covered lock before
Puja
-
- Posts: 3451
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Team for France
He's more of a front row cover now. His scrummaging technique is so good.JellyHead wrote:Surely Jonny May would step in.Puja wrote:Good point, although that is a niche situation. If Clifford has been on the bench, who would've gone lock. None of Wilson or Curry have the build, so it would've been bodge o'clock between Clifford and Billy.Oakboy wrote:I can understand the comments against Hughes but it was lucky that he was there to play adequately in the 2nd row as Kruis had already been replaced when Itoje was injured. Unfortunately, the only other bench candidate for that is Shields so I'd much prefer to stick with Hughes.
Puja
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
Enforced changes only. Could tinker with the back 3 but best leave May at FB, oops, wing, with Nowell on the other and Daly in no mans land.
As for bench. No changes
As for bench. No changes
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
One has to hope Daly improves at 15, as other bridges have either been burned or don't exist.
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
he has the skills to.Banquo wrote:One has to hope Daly improves at 15, as other bridges have either been burned or don't exist.
Just not sure if he is reading the game well enough at the moment or simply doesn't fancy the physicality of the aerial 'battle'.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm
Re: Team for France
Hasn't he previously said he wants to play 13 as he feels that is his best position?
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
He doesn't as yet have the positional skills needed imo.p/d wrote:he has the skills to.Banquo wrote:One has to hope Daly improves at 15, as other bridges have either been burned or don't exist.
Just not sure if he is reading the game well enough at the moment or simply doesn't fancy the physicality of the aerial 'battle'.
- Puja
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team for France
Foden thought his best position was scrum-half. Sometimes players shouldn't get to decide.Freddo wrote:Hasn't he previously said he wants to play 13 as he feels that is his best position?
Mind, I think he's a wing every day of the week, rather than a full-back, but at least his attacking play and entering the line on Saturday looked like a real 15.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
Top international wing, ropy full back at present.Puja wrote:Foden thought his best position was scrum-half. Sometimes players shouldn't get to decide.Freddo wrote:Hasn't he previously said he wants to play 13 as he feels that is his best position?
Mind, I think he's a wing every day of the week, rather than a full-back, but at least his attacking play and entering the line on Saturday looked like a real 15.
Puja
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
Sums him up.Banquo wrote:Top international wing, ropy full back at present.Puja wrote:Foden thought his best position was scrum-half. Sometimes players shouldn't get to decide.Freddo wrote:Hasn't he previously said he wants to play 13 as he feels that is his best position?
Mind, I think he's a wing every day of the week, rather than a full-back, but at least his attacking play and entering the line on Saturday looked like a real 15.
Puja
As an aside thought we saw a really mature, top quality performance from May yesterday. Took a lot of the heat off Daly without sacrificing his own attacking threat.
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
May has surprised me with his development, somebody has done a remarkable job in stabilising Bambip/d wrote:Sums him up.Banquo wrote:Top international wing, ropy full back at present.Puja wrote:
Foden thought his best position was scrum-half. Sometimes players shouldn't get to decide.
Mind, I think he's a wing every day of the week, rather than a full-back, but at least his attacking play and entering the line on Saturday looked like a real 15.
Puja
As an aside thought we saw a really mature, top quality performance from May yesterday. Took a lot of the heat off Daly without sacrificing his own attacking threat.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6429
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
Yes, before Saturday I'd have asked why not just swap Daly and Nowell if you don't want to play Brown. Maybe, though, Jones has something with Nowell's destructive wandering from the wing and he sees it as the best way to get Daly into the XV. I'd still prefer Daly on the wing but that result against Ireland curbs lots of criticism (for now).Banquo wrote:Top international wing, ropy full back at present.Puja wrote:Foden thought his best position was scrum-half. Sometimes players shouldn't get to decide.Freddo wrote:Hasn't he previously said he wants to play 13 as he feels that is his best position?
Mind, I think he's a wing every day of the week, rather than a full-back, but at least his attacking play and entering the line on Saturday looked like a real 15.
Puja
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
Not sure why anyone would think Nowell any better at 15 than Daly tbh. At least Daly can kick.Oakboy wrote:Yes, before Saturday I'd have asked why not just swap Daly and Nowell if you don't want to play Brown. Maybe, though, Jones has something with Nowell's destructive wandering from the wing and he sees it as the best way to get Daly into the XV. I'd still prefer Daly on the wing but that result against Ireland curbs lots of criticism (for now).Banquo wrote:Top international wing, ropy full back at present.Puja wrote:
Foden thought his best position was scrum-half. Sometimes players shouldn't get to decide.
Mind, I think he's a wing every day of the week, rather than a full-back, but at least his attacking play and entering the line on Saturday looked like a real 15.
Puja
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6429
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
It's only Nowell's love of the physical, meaning that he actually appears to enjoy the challenge of the high bomb. Daly looks like it's beneath his dignity.Banquo wrote:Not sure why anyone would think Nowell any better at 15 than Daly tbh. At least Daly can kick.Oakboy wrote:Yes, before Saturday I'd have asked why not just swap Daly and Nowell if you don't want to play Brown. Maybe, though, Jones has something with Nowell's destructive wandering from the wing and he sees it as the best way to get Daly into the XV. I'd still prefer Daly on the wing but that result against Ireland curbs lots of criticism (for now).Banquo wrote: Top international wing, ropy full back at present.
- Puja
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team for France
Actually, I think Daly goes for the high ball like he's forgotten he's playing 15 and remembers just in time to scramble in for his cue. "Oh shit, that should be mine, shouldn't it!"Oakboy wrote:It's only Nowell's love of the physical, meaning that he actually appears to enjoy the challenge of the high bomb. Daly looks like it's beneath his dignity.Banquo wrote:Not sure why anyone would think Nowell any better at 15 than Daly tbh. At least Daly can kick.Oakboy wrote:
Yes, before Saturday I'd have asked why not just swap Daly and Nowell if you don't want to play Brown. Maybe, though, Jones has something with Nowell's destructive wandering from the wing and he sees it as the best way to get Daly into the XV. I'd still prefer Daly on the wing but that result against Ireland curbs lots of criticism (for now).
Puja
Backist Monk
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for France
Really? I thought Itoje was quite short for a lock, around 6'5". Is he bigger?Epaminondas Pules wrote:3 or 4 inches.Stom wrote:Not for a while, but he's not much shorter than Itoje. Similar to George Robson was, I think.Puja wrote:
He has? Huh, every day a school day.
Puja
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
Must confess I've no memory of Nowell going up to contest a high bomb, but that could be me. I'm less bothered about the aerial contest though, more about positioning- something Goode is superb at (I'm not suggesting him!). It comes with experience.Oakboy wrote:It's only Nowell's love of the physical, meaning that he actually appears to enjoy the challenge of the high bomb. Daly looks like it's beneath his dignity.Banquo wrote:Not sure why anyone would think Nowell any better at 15 than Daly tbh. At least Daly can kick.Oakboy wrote:
Yes, before Saturday I'd have asked why not just swap Daly and Nowell if you don't want to play Brown. Maybe, though, Jones has something with Nowell's destructive wandering from the wing and he sees it as the best way to get Daly into the XV. I'd still prefer Daly on the wing but that result against Ireland curbs lots of criticism (for now).
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Team for France
Banquo, that humping of Ireland seems to have brought you prematurely out of hibernation. Cheers.Banquo wrote:Must confess I've no memory of Nowell going up to contest a high bomb, but that could be me. I'm less bothered about the aerial contest though, more about positioning- something Goode is superb at (I'm not suggesting him!). It comes with experience.Oakboy wrote:It's only Nowell's love of the physical, meaning that he actually appears to enjoy the challenge of the high bomb. Daly looks like it's beneath his dignity.Banquo wrote: Not sure why anyone would think Nowell any better at 15 than Daly tbh. At least Daly can kick.
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
I'd appeared just beforehand, a bit gloomy. Sprightlier nowSpiffy wrote:Banquo, that humping of Ireland seems to have brought you prematurely out of hibernation. Cheers.Banquo wrote:Must confess I've no memory of Nowell going up to contest a high bomb, but that could be me. I'm less bothered about the aerial contest though, more about positioning- something Goode is superb at (I'm not suggesting him!). It comes with experience.Oakboy wrote:
It's only Nowell's love of the physical, meaning that he actually appears to enjoy the challenge of the high bomb. Daly looks like it's beneath his dignity.

-
- Posts: 6004
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for France
I can see the thought process and it could/should work well, but then Lawes and Launchbury is a tried and tested combination that we already know works well.Mikey Brown wrote:I’ve never seen it. Can’t picture it. But we really can’t pick a squad based on whether we can cover 2 injuries at lock. What if Curry then goes down?
I’d love to see Launch alongside Kruis. Kruis can focus on the set piece Lawes can do the same job off the bench that he does so well.
TBH, I’m reasonably happy either way.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Team for France
Yes. It's a long time since an Ireland team has been bullied like that and they looked incapable of doing anything about it. Fair play to the Nigels - a simple game plan, well executed with power and spirit, and a great away win in Dublin.Banquo wrote:I'd appeared just beforehand, a bit gloomy. Sprightlier nowSpiffy wrote:Banquo, that humping of Ireland seems to have brought you prematurely out of hibernation. Cheers.Banquo wrote: Must confess I've no memory of Nowell going up to contest a high bomb, but that could be me. I'm less bothered about the aerial contest though, more about positioning- something Goode is superb at (I'm not suggesting him!). It comes with experience.. Surprised at result and more at performance- think we surprised you with the physicality.
-
- Posts: 19363
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
will give Schmidt some pause for thought.Spiffy wrote:Yes. It's a long time since an Ireland team has been bullied like that and they looked incapable of doing anything about it. Fair play to the Nigels - a simple game plan, well executed with power and spirit, and a great away win in Dublin.Banquo wrote:I'd appeared just beforehand, a bit gloomy. Sprightlier nowSpiffy wrote:
Banquo, that humping of Ireland seems to have brought you prematurely out of hibernation. Cheers.. Surprised at result and more at performance- think we surprised you with the physicality.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Team for France
The problem is that Schmidt does not seem to have too many options beyond the current squad, several of whom looked tired and well off the pace yesterday. The loss of locks Henderson and Beirne and the absence of Leavy is a big blow. Now Toner and Stander my be out too (Stander apparently fractured cheek/eye socket).Banquo wrote:will give Schmidt some pause for thought.Spiffy wrote:Yes. It's a long time since an Ireland team has been bullied like that and they looked incapable of doing anything about it. Fair play to the Nigels - a simple game plan, well executed with power and spirit, and a great away win in Dublin.Banquo wrote: I'd appeared just beforehand, a bit gloomy. Sprightlier now. Surprised at result and more at performance- think we surprised you with the physicality.
-
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for France
You just didn't adapt to the pressure England put on. A couple of senior players could have changed tact but stuck rigidly to the game plan, compounding the unforced errors and poor decision making at key times.Spiffy wrote:The problem is that Schmidt does not seem to have too many options beyond the current squad, several of whom looked tired and well off the pace yesterday. The loss of locks Henderson and Beirne and the absence of Leavy is a big blow. Now Toner and Stander my be out too (Stander apparently fractured cheek/eye socket).Banquo wrote:will give Schmidt some pause for thought.Spiffy wrote:
Yes. It's a long time since an Ireland team has been bullied like that and they looked incapable of doing anything about it. Fair play to the Nigels - a simple game plan, well executed with power and spirit, and a great away win in Dublin.
Do not see that happening again.