New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Home of our Rugby World Cup Discussions.
Official France 2023 website here: https://www.rugbyworldcup.com/2023

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Post by Lizard »

morepork wrote: Fri Sep 29, 2023 10:29 pm
canta_brian wrote: Fri Sep 29, 2023 10:13 pm Is it wrong that I’m pissed off we didn’t get to 100?
No.
Not at all.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Cameo
Posts: 2851
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Post by Cameo »

That was impressive. Felt like a throwback to when I'd tune into any All Black's game expecting a thrashing. Just looked more skillful, more confident, bigger, quicker, stronger...

I don't like speculating on this, but Italy really did give up in defence. Weirdly their attacking shape continued to look okay but there were some poor efforts overall once it started badly. Must be so demoralizing though.
Beasties
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Post by Beasties »

Fair play, when NZ are on it they’re an absolute joy to watch. I didn’t even watch the 2nd half either.

Not sure how relevant it is though in determining where the WC ends up.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Post by Which Tyler »

I think that playing flat-track bully can be good for the confidence.
The question then, is how much of the downturn in form is confidence (relating directly into execution) and how much is gameplan / talent?

For France, for example, I'd say their comparative downturn was about bedding in players into the first choice XV, and a little confidence due to that. Putting 96 on Namibia will have helped with both (but... Dupont... erm...).
Especially as they were running plays that they're happy to use against anyone (unlike England vs Chile, for example).

For NZ, I think it's more about gameplan and making the most of their talent. NZ have always been able rely on moments of individual brilliance, and able to take a mile every time the defence gives them an inch; always capable of putting in 5-10 minutes of just being unplayable and making the score a question of "how much" rather than "who".
So putting 96 on Italy will help their confidence and belief, but I'm not sure it improves their chances much against a top 4 team.

Which is not to write them off, of course, they're just "not necessarily the favourites" against 3 teams.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Post by Lizard »

For me it’s not about the score so much as the relative lack of inaccuracy, errors and things not working.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Cameo
Posts: 2851
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: New Zealand v Italy (Fri/Sat)

Post by Cameo »

People also forget that against France NZ đidnt have half their first choice pack or their first choice 12 (though France were missing theirs too).
Post Reply