Re: Scots Abroad VIII (or let's spot the new messiah)
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:39 pm
Some promising stuff from Hastings but it can't be easy. Bath are an absolute rabble and they have been all season.
The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://rugbyrebels.co.uk/
They are pretty much gone aren't they? Big problem for Scotland with Maitland still in the early stages of his deal. Less of an issue with Cowan & Steele. As for Cross I'm not quite sure how he revitalises his career from this point on. He was never a world beater but he was a decent prop and now he is rotated at a mid table championship team.switchskier wrote:Steele signs a 2 year contract extension with London Irish. A bit of a shame as I hoped he might replace Fowles at Edinburgh when they went down.
Been flicking in and out. Tonks has looked ok an his kicking has been miles better than Burleigh's has been all season. Steele had a decent pass for the LI try. That was harsh on LI, they deserved a bonus point.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Anyone else watchign this? Tonks isn't doing a terrible job at 10 for LI. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if he develops into an option at 10.
4 Scots in the starting 15 btw. I wonder if Maitland and Cowan fancied a trip to New York instead... it all seems a bit convenient really.
They absolutely do not deserve anything. Have you seen the positioning of the players when they have possession and try to string together attacks? I saw 10 players, yes 10 bunched up in the same small area. imagine if Sarries were turning the ball over? They'd have the run of the pitch. They have forwards who are walking from ruck to ruck. They look an absolute shambles.switchskier wrote:Been flicking in and out. Tonks has looked ok an his kicking has been miles better than Burleigh's has been all season. Steele had a decent pass for the LI try. That was harsh on LI, they deserved a bonus point.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Anyone else watchign this? Tonks isn't doing a terrible job at 10 for LI. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if he develops into an option at 10.
4 Scots in the starting 15 btw. I wonder if Maitland and Cowan fancied a trip to New York instead... it all seems a bit convenient really.
Jammy starting for Sarries too with Brown off the bench but both a bit annonymous.
Didn't think that Sarries were that much better, such a frustrating side to watch. LI fought for it, scored a decent try and were in the game. They'd benefit from getting more ball to their back three but as you hint, that'd kill their pack. They're not built as a cohesive team more an odd sort of mix.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:They absolutely do not deserve anything. Have you seen the positioning of the players when they have possession and try to string together attacks? I saw 10 players, yes 10 bunched up in the same small area. imagine if Sarries were turning the ball over? They'd have the run of the pitch. They have forwards who are walking from ruck to ruck. They look an absolute shambles.switchskier wrote:Been flicking in and out. Tonks has looked ok an his kicking has been miles better than Burleigh's has been all season. Steele had a decent pass for the LI try. That was harsh on LI, they deserved a bonus point.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Anyone else watchign this? Tonks isn't doing a terrible job at 10 for LI. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if he develops into an option at 10.
4 Scots in the starting 15 btw. I wonder if Maitland and Cowan fancied a trip to New York instead... it all seems a bit convenient really.
Jammy starting for Sarries too with Brown off the bench but both a bit annonymous.
Tonks did ok. He was trying to get play going and invited the forwards onto the ball. Steele was good, I can see why LI want him tied down. Cowan anonymous and Maitland was poor.
Think club rugby is his level. Great finisher but gets targeted in Test rugby.switchskier wrote:Cracking try from Visser today. Scotland have to try get him matched up one on one a bit more and let him go for it.
If he's the best available then you work to magnify his strengths and minimise the weaknesses.ARM wrote:Think club rugby is his level. Great finisher but gets targeted in Test rugby.switchskier wrote:Cracking try from Visser today. Scotland have to try get him matched up one on one a bit more and let him go for it.
We legitimately don't have anyone else. Maitland will be playing championship next season and has gone off the boil anyway.ARM wrote:Think club rugby is his level. Great finisher but gets targeted in Test rugby.switchskier wrote:Cracking try from Visser today. Scotland have to try get him matched up one on one a bit more and let him go for it.
He is for a bloke of his size. He just scored a beauty of an individual try for Quins against Saints today, leaving two opponents for dead with great sidesteps and acceleration. If he could learn to optimize the use of his bulk he'd be a tremendous player.Mikey Brown wrote:Maitland is a strange one. I've never been quite convinced by his attitude.
Visser is just a completely pansy in certain situations but a threat we can't ignore in others. If we plan to never have the ball, or get in endless kicking duels then he's not going to shine but there aren't many serious options.
There is a video somewhere on you tube in which a journalist goes to Visser's old club in Holland. Has some ex-team mates saying how, as a teenager, how amazing he was, flattening the old and experienced. But one also said "when it came to tackling he was the first one in the showers". I was disappointed to see that quote has now been cut from the video.Spiffy wrote:He is for a bloke of his size. He just scored a beauty of an individual try for Quins against Saints today, leaving two opponents for dead with great sidesteps and acceleration. If he could learn to optimize the use of his bulk he'd be a tremendous player.Mikey Brown wrote:Maitland is a strange one. I've never been quite convinced by his attitude.
Visser is just a completely pansy in certain situations but a threat we can't ignore in others. If we plan to never have the ball, or get in endless kicking duels then he's not going to shine but there aren't many serious options.
The only person that can help Tim Visser in that regard is Tim Visser.switchskier wrote:If he's the best available then you work to magnify his strengths and minimise the weaknesses.ARM wrote:Think club rugby is his level. Great finisher but gets targeted in Test rugby.switchskier wrote:Cracking try from Visser today. Scotland have to try get him matched up one on one a bit more and let him go for it.
I wonder if it's an import thing. If your goal is to play Test rugby, then once you've hit it and are a regular in the team maybe imports have little incentive to improve. We've seen similar with Richardt Strauss. Whereas non-imports desperately want to do what they can to improve the team.ARM wrote:The only person that can help Tim Visser in that regard is Tim Visser.switchskier wrote:If he's the best available then you work to magnify his strengths and minimise the weaknesses.ARM wrote:
Think club rugby is his level. Great finisher but gets targeted in Test rugby.
If he's not interested in getting his hands dirty in defence and improving his aerial game then he's not going to be the Test player he could otherwise be.
Visser isn't exactly a regular though. LI going down poses a problem for us but most times VC would pick Maitland over Visser.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I wonder if it's an import thing. If your goal is to play Test rugby, then once you've hit it and are a regular in the team maybe imports have little incentive to improve. We've seen similar with Richardt Strauss. Whereas non-imports desperately want to do what they can to improve the team.ARM wrote:The only person that can help Tim Visser in that regard is Tim Visser.switchskier wrote:
If he's the best available then you work to magnify his strengths and minimise the weaknesses.
If he's not interested in getting his hands dirty in defence and improving his aerial game then he's not going to be the Test player he could otherwise be.
There's something about his demeanour that screams 'I don't want to be here'. I can't tell if he's still taking it hard about never being an AB or if he's really laid back or if he's only in it for money. I thought he started fairly brightly for Scotland and clearly had the rugby brain so clearly lacking in Scots. Maybe he just doesn't have the belly for a fight.Mikey Brown wrote:Maitland is a strange one. I've never been quite convinced by his attitude.
Visser is just a completely pansy in certain situations but a threat we can't ignore in others. If we plan to never have the ball, or get in endless kicking duels then he's not going to shine but there aren't many serious options.
He hasn't looked consistently interested for a long time. He raised his game a significant amount for that RWC quarter against Aus but then again so did the rest of the team. The fact that he was just discarded for the rest of the 6N was pretty worrying considering he was actually fit. He looks just as disinterested for LI btw.Chunks Baws wrote:There's something about his demeanour that screams 'I don't want to be here'. I can't tell if he's still taking it hard about never being an AB or if he's really laid back or if he's only in it for money. I thought he started fairly brightly for Scotland and clearly had the rugby brain so clearly lacking in Scots. Maybe he just doesn't have the belly for a fight.Mikey Brown wrote:Maitland is a strange one. I've never been quite convinced by his attitude.
Visser is just a completely pansy in certain situations but a threat we can't ignore in others. If we plan to never have the ball, or get in endless kicking duels then he's not going to shine but there aren't many serious options.