RugbyRebels

Sandydragon wrote:

kk67 wrote:

jared_7 wrote:
Blaming immigrants is a result of policy favouring the "elites".

All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.

Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.

Comparing a lying, manipulative career politician to Trump is being very harsh on the politicos.
I'm not using a vague comparison with Hitler as a cheap political shot, it's not a Godwins Law situation.......the guy is totally out of control and clearly he is without any sort of moral compass.
I don't even believe he's a patriot.

Sandydragon wrote:

kk67 wrote:

jared_7 wrote:
Blaming immigrants is a result of policy favouring the "elites".

All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.

Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.

She's a lawyer turned politician. She is not a career politician. She held no political office before she was 53 in 2000.

kk67 wrote:

Sandydragon wrote:

kk67 wrote:
All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.

Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.

Comparing a lying, manipulative career politician to Trump is being very harsh on the politicos.
I'm not using a vague comparison with Hitler as a cheap political shot, it's not a Godwins Law situation.......the guy is totally out of control and clearly he is without any sort of moral compass.
I don't even believe he's a patriot.

This.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote: This.

LOL. I was worried before,......now we're agreeing I'm totally petrified.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

Sandydragon wrote:

kk67 wrote:
All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.

Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.

She's a lawyer turned politician. She is not a career politician. She held no political office before she was 53 in 2000.

She walks, talks and acts like one and whilst she wasn't a politician during her last stint in the White House, at least not a paid one, she was every inch a political wife for hers husbands presidency and the years before that. She is as much a political person as any aid politician.

I doubt her integrity, particularly given her run in with the FBI.

That said, she is the least worst option, by some considerable margin. Which is a sad state of affairs.

Sandydragon wrote:

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

Sandydragon wrote:
Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.

She's a lawyer turned politician. She is not a career politician. She held no political office before she was 53 in 2000.

She walks, talks and acts like one and whilst she wasn't a politician during her last stint in the White House, at least not a paid one, she was every inch a political wife for hers husbands presidency and the years before that. She is as much a political person as any aid politician.

I doubt her integrity, particularly given her run in with the FBI.

That said, she is the least worst option, by some considerable margin. Which is a sad state of affairs.

Two words.....Melanie Trump (aka 3rd trophy wife).

If wifes were an issue, we'd have Cherie Blair.
Yet another lawyer,......but at least this time it would be a decent one.

Sandydragon wrote:
That said, she is the least worst option, by some considerable margin. Which is a sad state of affairs.

I said some time ago that the slimy neocons would vote for the heinous La Clinton.

And here you are endorsing her.

Yuck.