RugbyRebels

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

cadofyddol wrote:

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:the only definition that makes sense for me is that the player is at least in the conversation to represent Earth against some frozen Martian virus/bacteria. That means top 3 or so on the planet. There can be a serious debate as to whether Priestland is in the top 3 in Wales.

As you don't speak for the rest of the planet, others are entitled to their own interpretation.

Despite saying "for me" I was totally speaking for the entire planet. Rumbled.

Young man,,,, is he even in the top 3 at Bath? he should not be in the squad,,,,IMHO.....

webbyinjapan wrote:

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

cadofyddol wrote:
As you don't speak for the rest of the planet, others are entitled to their own interpretation.

Despite saying "for me" I was totally speaking for the entire planet. Rumbled.

Young man,,,, is he even in the top 3 at Bath? he should not be in the squad,,,,IMHO.....

In fairness he's slightly hampered at Bath in being behind the coach's son. Ford's form has apparently been quite poor yet he has played almost every minute. Priestland was probably worth more time. I actually think he was pretty good against us. The drop goal attempts were sub-par but beyond that it was a reasonably accomplished performance

Sourdust wrote:I keep using this line, but it sums up the situation for me, and did even when Biggar was getting one cap a year stuck behind the U20s pack against The Virgin Islands:

Dan Biggar is half the player Rhys Priestland could be. But he's twice the player Rhys Priestland actually IS.

This.