indeed NZ's execution in the last two tists was poorDigby wrote:And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)morepork wrote:Go to the TMO to scrub a penalty decision. Jesus.
v All Blacks III: the Decider
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Bet Hansen isn't.zer0 wrote:Happy that Perenara was big enough not to milk a, potentially match winning, offside penalty at any of the breakdowns in the final minutes.
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
On the other hand, Beauden's kicking...Digby wrote:And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)morepork wrote:Go to the TMO to scrub a penalty decision. Jesus.
A miss might have left him mentally scarred and unable to lace up his boots ever again. The ref was only acting out of concern for him.
-
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
I thought he went to review Reads challenge in the air at 1st?Digby wrote:And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)morepork wrote:Go to the TMO to scrub a penalty decision. Jesus.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Missing McCaw and Carter, and who wouldn'tBanquo wrote:indeed NZ's execution in the last two tists was poorDigby wrote:And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)morepork wrote:Go to the TMO to scrub a penalty decision. Jesus.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Read getting a hardly rapturous reception. He'll get it in the neck I suspect,
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
ooh boo hoo baby, did you not get the result you wanted, and now you're being a pathetic little bitch? We have something for you to rub on that. It's called fuck you cunt face. Suck it up you fat fluffer.zer0 wrote:Happy that Perenara was big enough not to milk a, potentially match winning, offside penalty at any of the breakdowns in the final minutes.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
that escalatedBuggaluggs wrote:ooh boo hoo baby, did you not get the result you wanted, and now you're being a pathetic little bitch? We have something for you to rub on that. It's called fuck you cunt face. Suck it up you fat fluffer.zer0 wrote:Happy that Perenara was big enough not to milk a, potentially match winning, offside penalty at any of the breakdowns in the final minutes.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
did they get that cap from Huggy Bear??
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Hook, line and sinker.Buggaluggs wrote:ooh boo hoo baby, did you not get the result you wanted, and now you're being a pathetic little bitch? We have something for you to rub on that. It's called fuck you cunt face. Suck it up you fat fluffer.
It was exactly the fish I was looking for... Though he did bite a lot harder than I anticipated.Banquo wrote:that escalated
Last edited by zer0 on Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
something to treasurezer0 wrote:It was exactly the fish I was looking for... Though he did bite a lot harder than I anticipated.Banquo wrote:that escalated
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Fuck. Might as well look for inappropriate use of colouful language while we're at it. BB lost it with the kicking. Too many dropsies from the ABs. They did the right thing pinning the Lions back but when it became clear that the ref wasn't sympathetic to the milking of the penalty tittieh, there should have been quick hooking and more aggressive attack with the ball in hand. Lions did a great job of getting in our faces, but thankfully Farell was a total wooden soldier at 12. Read looking a bit Donald Trump at captain at times.Big D wrote:I thought he went to review Reads challenge in the air at 1st?Digby wrote:And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)morepork wrote:Go to the TMO to scrub a penalty decision. Jesus.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Buggaluggs wrote:ooh boo hoo baby, did you not get the result you wanted, and now you're being a pathetic little bitch? We have something for you to rub on that. It's called fuck you cunt face. Suck it up you fat fluffer.zer0 wrote:Happy that Perenara was big enough not to milk a, potentially match winning, offside penalty at any of the breakdowns in the final minutes.
You on the rag?
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
didn't take your chances, simple as.morepork wrote:Fuck. Might as well look for inappropriate use of colouful language while we're at it. BB lost it with the kicking. Too many dropsies from the ABs. They did the right thing pinning the Lions back but when it became clear that the ref wasn't sympathetic to the milking of the penalty tittieh, there should have been quick hooking and more aggressive attack with the ball in hand. Lions did a great job of getting in our faces, but thankfully Farell was a total wooden soldier at 12. Read looking a bit Donald Trump at captain at times.Big D wrote:I thought he went to review Reads challenge in the air at 1st?Digby wrote:
And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Banquo wrote:didn't take your chances, simple as.morepork wrote:Fuck. Might as well look for inappropriate use of colouful language while we're at it. BB lost it with the kicking. Too many dropsies from the ABs. They did the right thing pinning the Lions back but when it became clear that the ref wasn't sympathetic to the milking of the penalty tittieh, there should have been quick hooking and more aggressive attack with the ball in hand. Lions did a great job of getting in our faces, but thankfully Farell was a total wooden soldier at 12. Read looking a bit Donald Trump at captain at times.Big D wrote: I thought he went to review Reads challenge in the air at 1st?
Who you calling simple bro? It's 6:00am, I'm 3 beers in, and should now probably look to continue the day at a park with some meth heads yelling at pigeons.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
lol, enjoy!morepork wrote:Banquo wrote:didn't take your chances, simple as.morepork wrote:
Fuck. Might as well look for inappropriate use of colouful language while we're at it. BB lost it with the kicking. Too many dropsies from the ABs. They did the right thing pinning the Lions back but when it became clear that the ref wasn't sympathetic to the milking of the penalty tittieh, there should have been quick hooking and more aggressive attack with the ball in hand. Lions did a great job of getting in our faces, but thankfully Farell was a total wooden soldier at 12. Read looking a bit Donald Trump at captain at times.
Who you calling simple bro? It's 6:00am, I'm 3 beers in, and should now probably look to continue the day at a park with some meth heads yelling at pigeons.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14575
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Can't see that being anything other than a pen against Owens. Not that anybody would've done anything different than reacting as he did. But thems the laws.
Everyone on top of their game except Iceman. What a match, what a series. Good to see the NZ fans moaning about the referees performance. You know they know they've been in a scrap when that happens.
Everyone on top of their game except Iceman. What a match, what a series. Good to see the NZ fans moaning about the referees performance. You know they know they've been in a scrap when that happens.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:09 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
If so can he then rule on an issue that wasn't the subject of the review? Anyway, Scots get it in the plums again. Joubert awarded 78th minute penalty in world cup when it was touched by Aus player & should have been scrum. World rugby says can't use tmo in such circumstances.Big D wrote:I thought he went to review Reads challenge in the air at 1st?Digby wrote:And to make a mistake in doing so it would seem. Still the bigger thing was NZ not executing on chances (and actually the Lions fluffed a chance to two too)morepork wrote:Go to the TMO to scrub a penalty decision. Jesus.
This clearly knocked on and played by offside player only yet changed to a scrum :-/
I look forward to our retrospective semi final.

Last edited by af73 on Sat Jul 08, 2017 11:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
agreed, agreed, agreed, agreedMellsblue wrote:Can't see that being anything other than a pen against Owens. Not that anybody would've done anything different than reacting as he did. But thems the laws.
Everyone on top of their game except Iceman. What a match, what a series. Good to see the NZ fans moaning about the referees performance. You know they know they've been in a scrap when that happens.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10533
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
A game you couldn't take your eyes off. Despite early AB dominance, the Lions could have won that with an it more composure in the second half.
Some huge performances out there and some average ones on both sides. But if nothing else this series has demonstrated the importance of a good goal kicker.
Some huge performances out there and some average ones on both sides. But if nothing else this series has demonstrated the importance of a good goal kicker.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Mellsblue wrote:Can't see that being anything other than a pen against Owens. Not that anybody would've done anything different than reacting as he did. But thems the laws.
Everyone on top of their game except Iceman. What a match, what a series. Good to see the NZ fans moaning about the referees performance. You know they know they've been in a scrap when that happens.
I will fight you.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
yet what did we sacrifice today on that altar; Sexton is a good kicker to be fair.Sandydragon wrote:A game you couldn't take your eyes off. Despite early AB dominance, the Lions could have won that with an it more composure in the second half.
Some huge performances out there and some average ones on both sides. But if nothing else this series has demonstrated the importance of a good goal kicker.
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
shut up Simmonds you utter utter utter c&nt
-
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
yay, gats called out all Faz's fck ups, there is a god
-
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
The laws on the matter whilst trying to be clear are actually not and don't help the ref at all. Under law 11.6 it would be a penalty "offside after a knock on". But then under law 11.5 perhaps not as it states accidental offside is "when an offside player cannot avoid being touched by the ball....".Mellsblue wrote:Can't see that being anything other than a pen against Owens. Not that anybody would've done anything different than reacting as he did. But thems the laws.
Everyone on top of their game except Iceman. What a match, what a series. Good to see the NZ fans moaning about the referees performance. You know they know they've been in a scrap when that happens.
My view on that type of situation has been consistent since the last WC. The players can't make themselves invisible or stop their reactions when they are that close to the play and law 11.6 is for deliberate acts. But as a Scottish Lions fan I would be inclined to think that.