Stom wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:23 am
Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:42 pm
I’m at the point I’m not 100% about any of Dombrandt, Earl or Mercer (with Willis/Fisilau very, very promising but entirely unproven options) but Borthwick definitely needs to recognise some sort of game-plan that can make use of their running talents.
Willis (and I think Fisilau) are the options potentially most capable of creating go-forward off slow ball, but we can’t rely on that yet and can’t go on hoping for one of the others to play like 2016 Billy.
If we’re assuming we’ll have slow, poor ball forever we may as well give up completely.
If we continue to produce slow ball that needs a player we do not have to produce workable ball...we're fooked.
It's got to the stage where we just need to pick an 8 and stick with them. Just one of them. Ditto in other slots, too, which is why it would be wonderful if lukewarm boy did go to France.
We also need to find some props or convince Bristol to sack Lam.
The snag is that Dombrandt got the whole 6N without showing he owned the shirt. Then BV was picked as the only 8 for the RWC - arguably one of the biggest selection clangers since Robinson picked a schoolboy at centre. Going back, Jones refused to pick the best club 8 in Simmonds.
I think the back row selection is crucial going forward. Quite how you get balance, pace, turnover capability and line-out prowess into the unit I'm not sure.
6. Martin/Chessum
7. Underhill/Earl
8. Dombrandt/Barbeary/Fisilau
????? Having a lock/backrower at 6 offends many but I can't see an effective alternative unless the 8 offers a true line-out option. I do think that pace is essential for at least two of the three positions. Barbeary has great potential for pacey go-forward off the back of the scrum. Fisilau looks the best all-round package - maybe the perfect fit for the 20 shirt?
I'd still pick J Willis at 7 if he was available and his brother, once fit, needs a chance still.