Re: RWC Training Squad
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:09 pm
Shame for Mako, hope Slade out doesn’t mean Porter in.
I can't believe we've ended up with Youngs back in the driving seat at 9. It really felt like we'd moved on and was quite pleased with Mitchell's work from the bench in the 6 nations.
I thought Slade was out injured, but may have that wrongOakboy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:08 am If it's a straight choice between Marchant and Slade, fair enough. But, if it means relying on Tuilagi to be fit or Farrell playing at 12, I think Slade's omission is ludicrous.
I have similar reservations about Billy V. If, as is rumoured, he will be the only 8, the decision could rebound badly.
The rumoured selection has turned the likelihood of us being a grim watch into a certainty. It's as if matching Argentina's physicality has become the main aim.
exactly. We have about 10 very good proven intls at their best- but I don't think a lot will be able to reproduce their best form (age, injuries, teammatesEpaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:41 am Kind of to be expected really. Only one true 8 is a concern, but I'm less concerned as the alternatives have been meh at best. Ribbans & Martin over Hill is somewhat surprising. Hooker really concerns me. Once you get past George and LCD the stocks are really low. LCD being out is a proper blow.
Malins is a lucky sod. With Daly's versatility I'd have taken Slade over Malins any day. SH just looks.......er........a bit shit. BUT we're utter shit at clearing and presenting clean ball anyway so whoever plays is going to be playing 3sec+ ruck ball, so somewhat moot. UNLESS there has been an enormous focus on actually getting quick ruck speed. Which judging by Saturday we can largely assume has not happened.
You can put together a decent 23 from that lot that will be competitive, but still a way off the top teams. But there is little alternative to what has been selected.
He's the poor sod who has played outside Youngs and Farrell so many times. And, can you imagine his frustration playing at 13 with Smith at 10 only to have Farrell at 12 neutering his skillset? He is also the one who has been in dozens of training camps hearing that all will be well if/when Tuilagi is ever fit. How he was supposed to own the shirt with all that negativity is beyond me. I bet Slade wishes he had gone to France with the others.fivepointer wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:20 am Tough on Slade but he hasn't ever really made the shirt his own.
Slade always looked a bit stodgy for a test Outside Centre - more convincing as a fullback or inside centre for meOakboy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:08 am If it's a straight choice between Marchant and Slade, fair enough. But, if it means relying on Tuilagi to be fit or Farrell playing at 12, I think Slade's omission is ludicrous.
I have similar reservations about Billy V. If, as is rumoured, he will be the only 8, the decision could rebound badly.
The rumoured selection has turned the likelihood of us being a grim watch into a certainty. It's as if matching Argentina's physicality has become the main aim.
Given Dombrandt and Simmonds are not involved I can see some sense in picking Earl as the one player who has genuine pace (and utilises it when playing rugby as opposed to just in training) in the backrow. (To be fair Ludlam whilst maybe not quite as quick has shown some of this quality to in link play and T Curry used to).Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:23 am I'm a bit confused by Earl's spot too. When did he last play? Have I completely forgotten a recent appearance? Yes he's versatile, but again with Ludlam, Wilis and Curry all having played 6, 7 and 8 I just don't see why that even matters.
Not taking a second 8 with Billy's recent England form, and having just had his leg reassembled, seems like a particularly unnecessary risk but Ludlam did cover there quite well in the 6 nations.
I'm not sure I follow your point about Marchant vs Slade. As bad as Tuilagi's injury record is, we're 'relying' on anyone who is in the squad to be fit, aren't we? I'm hoping we're viewing him as a 12 only, with Lawrence able to play both but likely to start at 12.
Dan ahead of Blamire is interesting too.
I'm very curious to know what Borthwick's plans for Daly are. I'd love to think he is taking Malins' role.
So far, we've had 1 OC who's really been able to make a backline with Youngs and Farrell actually work, and who also had Tuilagi's return hanging over his head (and all those attempts to make Te'o work as an international OC).Oakboy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 11:07 amHe's the poor sod who has played outside Youngs and Farrell so many times. And, can you imagine his frustration playing at 13 with Smith at 10 only to have Farrell at 12 neutering his skillset? He is also the one who has been in dozens of training camps hearing that all will be well if/when Tuilagi is ever fit. How he was supposed to own the shirt with all that negativity is beyond me. I bet Slade wishes he had gone to France with the others.
Having said that, would it be hell of a shock to hear that Tuilagi is crocked again with Slade called in as injury replacement. The irony then is that Slade would probably be in the starting XV with Lawrence.
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:41 am Hooker really concerns me. Once you get past George and LCD the stocks are really low.